White Shaming - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-21-2018, 04:14 PM   #451 (permalink)
county fair energy
 
WWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,773
Default

Unless the owner of the franchise instructed the manager to follow black customers, or follows every black person, then it's not systemic and therefore not racism, but rather prejudiced behavior.

The second hypothetical doesn't even make sense nor does it illustrate your own point lol.

And how are you going to bring truth into a battle of semantics.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
I know what real life is, I've been living in it for well over a decade
Quote:
Originally Posted by jadis View Post
WWWP is pretty but should be cancelled (digital blackface)

#DEMODFROWNLAND
#TERMLIMITSFORMODERATORS
WWWP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2018, 04:16 PM   #452 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 7,634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls View Post
Again, no. You dont have any information.

Suppose I told you the manager wasn't even following the guy but was instead blocking the aisles at the end of the night and ran into them a few times? Or that the store follows random people as part of a pre-emptive security plan? Both scenarios happen in real life.

And for the second case, the family is 100% Ugandian(?) and would like to continue the trend. It's nothing more than selfish parenting and pride.

The correct answer is always I DONT KNOW, unless you know. You don't get to stumble into a scenario with 0 context or information and make assumptions about truth.
Well, strictly speaking, if I'm to take your scenario that literally, yeah. But what's the point? I might have missed the origins of this particular exercise and therefore also what it is you're getting at.

So let me modify what I said before and say that both scenarios look a hell of a lot like racist motivations are at play, but it could be some other weird reason. Like the black guy who walks into a store happens to also wear a t-shirt saying "shoplifting is fun!".
MicShazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2018, 04:18 PM   #453 (permalink)
.
 
grindy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: .
Posts: 7,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolverinewolfweiselpigeon View Post
Unless the owner of the franchise instructed the manager to follow black customers, or follows every black person, then it's not systemic and therefore not racism, but rather prejudiced behavior.

The second hypothetical doesn't even make sense nor does it illustrate your own point lol.

And how are you going to bring truth into a battle of semantics.
Are there similar semantic constructs around sexism and homophobia as well?
__________________
A smell of petroleum prevails throughout.
grindy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2018, 04:19 PM   #454 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 7,634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolverinewolfweiselpigeon View Post
then it's not systemic and therefore not racism,
****, I didn't realize you really meant it. Why even have the phrase "systemic racism" then, if all racism is systemic by default.
MicShazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2018, 04:21 PM   #455 (permalink)
Fck Ths Thngs
 
DwnWthVwls's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,261
Default

First, off there are no semantics here...

You claimed: "You don't think you could identify racism or prejudice without someone spelling out their intentions? That's silly."

I gave you scenarios, and you proceeded to identify each persons intention (which is a truth claim). The point of my questioning was to demonstrate that it's not simple to distinguish between racism and prejudice. I don't know what line of reasoning you have to think otherwise. You could try explaining instead of simply disagreeing.

and racism doesn't need to be systemic to exist.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolverinewolfweiselpigeon View Post
The second hypothetical doesn't even make sense nor does it illustrate your own point lol.
It demonstrates an action which may appear to be racist or prejudice could be completely innocent. That's pretty much exactly my point, you don't know.
__________________
I don't got a god complex, you got a simple god...

Quote:
Originally Posted by elphenor View Post
I'd vote for Trump

Last edited by DwnWthVwls; 05-21-2018 at 04:34 PM.
DwnWthVwls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2018, 04:22 PM   #456 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 7,634
Default

Ah, now I get what this whole thing is about. Yeah, you'd have to know on what basis someone is judged to be able to recognize it as, for example, racism.
MicShazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2018, 04:24 PM   #457 (permalink)
county fair energy
 
WWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,773
Default

Because the commonly understood definition of racism is outdated and wrong, and implies that racism goes in all directions. While prejudice is a symptom of racism, it's not the same thing so it's important to make that distinction.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
I know what real life is, I've been living in it for well over a decade
Quote:
Originally Posted by jadis View Post
WWWP is pretty but should be cancelled (digital blackface)

#DEMODFROWNLAND
#TERMLIMITSFORMODERATORS
WWWP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2018, 04:26 PM   #458 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Aalborg
Posts: 7,634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolverinewolfweiselpigeon View Post
Because the commonly understood definition of racism is outdated and wrong, and implies that racism goes in all directions. While prejudice is a symptom of racism, it's not the same thing so it's important to make that distinction.
Racism does absolutely go in all directions. Depending on when and where; some directions more than others.
MicShazam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2018, 04:26 PM   #459 (permalink)
Fck Ths Thngs
 
DwnWthVwls's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,261
Default

Racism does go in all directions. I'd like to hear your reasoning otherwise.

How does a black person hating a white person because they are white not count as racism?

Editted: to be less jerky.
__________________
I don't got a god complex, you got a simple god...

Quote:
Originally Posted by elphenor View Post
I'd vote for Trump
DwnWthVwls is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2018, 04:28 PM   #460 (permalink)
county fair energy
 
WWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grindy View Post
Are there similar semantic constructs around sexism and homophobia as well?
Not that I can think of, but there are certainly misunderstandings within those topics not unlike the racism vs prejudice issue. F.ex concepts of privilege.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
I know what real life is, I've been living in it for well over a decade
Quote:
Originally Posted by jadis View Post
WWWP is pretty but should be cancelled (digital blackface)

#DEMODFROWNLAND
#TERMLIMITSFORMODERATORS
WWWP is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.