|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-18-2018, 01:46 PM | #301 (permalink) | |
Mate, Spawn & Die
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
|
Quote:
|
|
05-18-2018, 01:46 PM | #302 (permalink) |
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
I’m racist.
__________________
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND: https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html |
05-18-2018, 06:47 PM | #303 (permalink) | |
Fck Ths Thngs
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,261
|
The problem with the white privilege claim is actually showing systematic white privilege. Also, the definition WIDELY varies. Bunch of anecdotes and questionable stats used on both sides. There is a difference between anecdotal racism holding down some minorities and systematic white privilege. Too much damn nuance to wrap my head around.. Idk.
Quote:
and the legacy thing - unless youre talking percentages that doesn't demonstrate anything. Please explain as I'm pretty ignorant about this topic. Also, not accepting white privilege exists doesn't require evidence based on the same logic that not accepting God's existence doesnt require evidence. You don't get to just throw out reason because emotion. To all: If everyone in the entire world was one race, do you think there wouldn't be certain groups of people that got ahead? It seems to be a fundamental characteristic of society.. what would you blame it on if there were only white people and how do you know some of those factors aren't also part of the problem currently? As always, I take the position.. yeah there's that, but there is also this.
__________________
I don't got a god complex, you got a simple god... Last edited by DwnWthVwls; 05-18-2018 at 07:14 PM. |
|
05-18-2018, 07:00 PM | #304 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
The problem with rejecting the existence of white privilege is the idea that it has to be systematically enforced when it's really a cultural norm. Also, the definition WIDELY varies.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
05-18-2018, 07:14 PM | #306 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
I'm right though. You're demanding a systemic example of privilege when it's an issue based on implicit biases. I mean if you really want the justification, it's the echoes of slavery and Jim Crow.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
05-18-2018, 07:16 PM | #307 (permalink) |
Fck Ths Thngs
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,261
|
That's definitely not how I've heard it presented.. "Systematic" is always paired with "white privilege" in the debates I've heard. Your point is another topic completely. Lucem used the term in the post that kicked off this discussion.
Also, I'm not demanding anything.. Go get pissed and come back so we can troll Chula. |
05-18-2018, 07:18 PM | #308 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
Much like free speech, ithe concept been hijacked by obnoxious ideologues.
What's your interpretation of white privilege? I mean as a term, not whether or not you agree with its validity.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
05-18-2018, 07:26 PM | #310 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
So where does the requirement for privilege to be systematic fit into that?
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
|