Now that's more like it.

I'm going to type that I am a communist but not a capitol C one.

I'm a commie now.

Welcome to the fold, comrade. We’ve been waiting. We love you.

Communism isn't a front for unaccountable collective ownership, is it? Because I don't support that comrade.

Oh no no no

You buy timeshare slots to the intentional living space from elph. We keep everything in tip top shape and our yearly upkeep fees low by hiring illegals to supervise the free labor we get from the local for profit prison.

https://media.tenor.co/images/60c5c1...5ac1d27b08/raw

You literally couldn't say Libertarian Socialism and define it without an internal contradiction.

It’s the socialism side that doesn’t work with it. Considering socialism requires force and and a violation of the NAP for anyone who doesn’t want to partake in the distribution of their wealth.

I’m sure there are many forms of Libertarianism that don’t necessitate a contradiction but that does.

It’s capitalism that’s impossible to align with libertarianism. Capitalism is predicated on the theft of natural resources by assigning the rights of control to people who have documents recognized by the capitalist power structure. Property is theft.

Socialism is, at least, an attempt to correct the inherent injustice of capitalism. Neither system can be truly libertarian but socialism has its sails set in the direction of freedom whereas capitalism is sailing further into the depths tyranny and oppression.

Church

The Pueblo Indians lived for at least two centuries in a completely classless and politically non-hierarchical social structure. They didn’t number in the millions but they did number in the thousands.