| DwnWthVwls |
04-13-2018 04:02 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord
(Post 1940623)
It doesn't have to be completely Draconian, but there should be reasonable limits to the amount of money you can pass on.
Yes let's continue to be ruled by the desires of entitled rich kids.
|
Do you have a problem with wealthy people getting to choose who gets their wealth or a problem with wealthy people keeping their wealth within the family?
Pretty hypocritical to take the position of: wealth can be redistributed, but only to charity or some other arbitrary entity I deem a worthy recipient.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord
(Post 1940639)
I imagine my first act of not letting rich kids keep their parents' wealth for no reason probably wouldn't break the country, but I've gone on record multiple times to say that people are too stupid to know how to govern themselves under any form of government. You're the one who seems to have faith in social Darwinism.
|
If people are too stupid to govern themselves, than surely they can not govern others.. which means both anarchy and structured societies will never work.. only one thing left to do:
|
