|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-28-2020, 06:18 AM | #1051 (permalink) | ||
Zum Henker Defätist!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
11-28-2020, 06:25 AM | #1052 (permalink) |
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,992
|
Factory smoke doesn't have teeth, and bananas don't have feet with which to kick, so your statement is fundamentally flawed...
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
11-28-2020, 10:52 AM | #1053 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 4,403
|
FTR I don't rule communism out I just don't see it as some sort of inevitability.
I do think capitalism isn't the end of history. It will probably eventually be replaced but it's still a question mark to me what will likely replace it and how soon. And by what mechanism. You say the elites will never allow capitalism to fade without revolution, but wouldn't that have applied to all the previous economic and political power structures as well? The transition to capitalism from feudalism was mostly just a subversion of the ancient power structures by new forms of wealth creation that the elites simply didn't control. It seems like revolution has an inherent sort of accelerationist logic to it where society basically has to crumble and deteriorate in order to create conditions necessary for people to be provoked into rebellion. I'm skeptical that this dynamic could ever provide a suitable foundation for any sort of worthwhile socialist society. |
11-28-2020, 12:43 PM | #1054 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Westberlin
Posts: 56
|
Quote:
In my opinion everything important is said. One problem of your thinking in my opinion is that you believe in "things" like capitalism and the "system" that comes after. But these are just notions. Why should we dispense with the powerful effects of market mechanisms? We have market economies which will be more and more regulated. You could also say "humanized". That's the simple truth. This process continues since about 200 years. And this process will go on. At the "end" of this process we won't have a different thing than "capitalism". We'll still have market economies - but much more regulated than we can imagine today. Much more sustainable. And very probably with a universal basic income. Imagine the 19th century. Most of these Manchester capitalists of that time could never imagine that workers live so much better today, have many more rights and still work in a market economy, under market conditions. But which market conditions? We make these conditions. It's a simple evolution. And the thinking in so-called "systems" goes wrong. PS: If you want this evolution try to consume with a social and ecological conscience - and don't think so much about Marxism and capitalism.
__________________
I speak German English. |
|
11-28-2020, 03:12 PM | #1055 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 4,403
|
I dunno what I think of your executions tbh. Your English needs a little work my friend. Not that I'm judging, I know how hard it is to learn a different language. But yeah it's not entirely clear what you mean at times.
I don't see any inherent reason why capitalism will be the end of history. The 200 years you cited is not much time at all compared to the rest of history. It seems like a lack of imagination and perspective to think nothing will replace the current order imo. |
11-28-2020, 03:24 PM | #1056 (permalink) | |
Zum Henker Defätist!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
|
If you can't see how fair trade bananas are going to save capitalism then you're a Russia bot.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
11-28-2020, 04:05 PM | #1057 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 4,403
|
I think you underestimate how bad the working conditions were in the 1800s/early 1900s. Guarantee you those jobs were even more soulless and unsafe and for worse pay.
Main difference today is automation is getting rid of jobs. Yeah they're at peak productivity but that's cause of the robots not the workers. |
11-28-2020, 04:17 PM | #1058 (permalink) |
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
I never experienced anything like the brutality he describes in this mother****er. I get what elph means with the soulless nature of surveillance capitalism though. But you’d have to dig deep into the bowels of American workplaces to rival this ****. But what’s happening in places like the Congo and Brazil to maintain our lifestyles might be worse than what Sinclair was describing which I found more horrific than any descriptions on slavery that I’ve read (and I’ve read a fair bit on it)
__________________
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND: https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html |
11-28-2020, 05:12 PM | #1059 (permalink) | |
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
Quote:
And yes the American workplace is a 21st C gulag. I have seen some horrible **** with my own eyes.
__________________
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND: https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html |
|
11-28-2020, 07:23 PM | #1060 (permalink) | ||
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 4,403
|
Quote:
Quote:
Foucault was describing a way that entrenched powers secure themselves through veiling their mechanisms. That's precisely what I'm saying is the veiling only makes it seem even more entrenched. |
||
|