![]() |
Would be a good point if social influence wasn't such a big part of this discussion.
|
Quote:
Once you start talking about social influence as if it’s non-biological you’re off in the mystic again. |
I don't disagree with that, but it's still far too reductionist imo because you're stripping away myriad relevant factors.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Yes those are things. Not much of a discussion is it.
|
Quote:
|
I guess I don't. Explain the hack's point for me.
You seriously don't consider equating (or as some might say: reducing) our predisposition to accept social influence with social influence itself to be a valuable stance, do you? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:32 PM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.