Political Discussions for "Adults" - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-18-2020, 06:15 PM   #1 (permalink)
jwb
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 4,403
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBig3 View Post
Then why do you doubt me? You have to keep in mind that these Congressional candidates in the House and Senate aren't always running on party. Graham in South Carolina, Collins in Maine, Gardner in Colorado, and McSally in Arizona aren't in good shape.

Are they going to know shame? No but who cares? The money will pour in, and the video will roll, and they're going to be accused of being hypocrites, and they're going to get flustered and say something dumb - and Trump is going to bus roll them hard, and if the Democrats for once had some balls to twist the blade they'd win.

The problem is, for the people on the fence, this is going to look like one more problem for the GOP brand. They were already behind in the States that mattered. The smartest thing they could do is appoint Mereck Garland, but Trump is a dope.

It's also where the GOP needs to triage money. Becuase someone's going to take a hit for this, and they're going to need to move resources from fights they shouldn't to fights they need to. There's a part of me that things she chose to go now just to spite the bastard.

However it happened, she was a real icon and she did a lot of gender equality in the United States and this is a major loss for the country.
I mean I know **** all about what it takes to get a SC justice appoimted so I won't be surprised if they don't or don't even try.

But clearly it's not going to be looking like hypocrites that will stop them. You literally cited Lindsay Graham who played a prominent role in arguing for the necessity of the Clinton impeachment and then played dumb for Trump. That was less than a year ago.
jwb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2020, 06:23 PM   #2 (permalink)
killedmyraindog
 
TheBig3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwb View Post
I mean I know **** all about what it takes to get a SC justice appoimted so I won't be surprised if they don't or don't even try.

But clearly it's not going to be looking like hypocrites that will stop them. You literally cited Lindsay Graham who played a prominent role in arguing for the necessity of the Clinton impeachment and then played dumb for Trump. That was less than a year ago.
The Senate has to approve. Obama could have just seated Garland if he wasn't such a do-gooder because it isn't explicit what "advise and consent" means, and there's some loophole that if Congress is out, the Executive can just appoint without it. But here we are.

The only thing that's going to keep the wolves at bay here is the voter. Nothing and everything is legal if people vote for it. And there's a ton of calculation going on right now in the cloak rooms.
__________________
I've moved to a new address
TheBig3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2020, 06:26 PM   #3 (permalink)
SGR
No Ice In My Bourbon
 
SGR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 4,327
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBig3 View Post
The Senate has to approve. Obama could have just seated Garland if he wasn't such a do-gooder because it isn't explicit what "advise and consent" means, and there's some loophole that if Congress is out, the Executive can just appoint without it. But here we are.

The only thing that's going to keep the wolves at bay here is the voter. Nothing and everything is legal if people vote for it. And there's a ton of calculation going on right now in the cloak rooms.
This is true and definitely another way of looking at it. Though I lean towards Trump trying to get the appointment through, depending on their calculations, he may decide to commit to waiting until he's re-elected or defeated for the appointment to proceed in an effort to win over the favorability of independent voters.
SGR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.