Political Discussions for "Adults"

The Batlord · 04-17-2020, 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk

Not when you know the variables. The speed increase Vs the number of deaths (which is fairly easily statistically calculated)

Weighing risks boils down to trolley problems. Even if it’s just against a potential outcome.

I mean you're just trying to distract from you wanting to kill people cause you're just so durn mad at them even if you'd never actually follow through with the killings if the opportunity presented itself.

See this is the problem with not understanding what you actually mean cause you're too emotionally volatile to gauge your own desires. I'm ****ing pissed off at all these ****heads breaking quarantine cause they're bored and and don't feel like making three meals a day for their kids so they come to me and endanger me so I want to cough on their sandwiches and splooge in their Cokes, but I know at the end of the day that all I really want is to not have to go to work and for people to not be retards.

So I vent. But I don't mistake that for my actual desired policies.

OccultHawk · 04-17-2020, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WWWP

But trolley problems arent tools to measure an outcome, they're merely an illustration.

Automated cars have to learn to evaluate and decide trolley problems.

The tools to measure is what makes the trolley problem so that’s right but merely an illustration isn’t right when they’re made all the time. Is it worth having plane crashes in order for aviation to exist? That’s a trolley problem.

OccultHawk · 04-17-2020, 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord

I mean you're just trying to distract from you wanting to kill people cause you're just so durn mad at them even if you'd never actually follow through with the killings if the opportunity presented itself.

See this is the problem with not understanding what you actually mean cause you're too emotionally volatile to gauge your own desires. I'm ****ing pissed off at all these ****heads breaking quarantine cause they're bored and and don't feel like making three meals a day for their kids so they come to me and endanger me so I want to cough on their sandwiches and splooge in their Cokes, but I know at the end of the day that all I really want is to not have to go to work and for people to not be retards.

So I vent. But I don't mistake that for my actual desired policies.

If you could implement it into law that the CEO corporate level ****s at BK had to either give up everything they own or face the death penalty would you do it?

DwnWthVwls · 04-17-2020, 06:00 PM

Only you are that ridiculous.

The Batlord · 04-17-2020, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk

If you could implement it into law that the CEO corporate level ****s at BK had to either give up everything they own or face the death penalty would you do it?

That is an entirely different question because corporate level ****s at BK are if not lizard people then functionally lizard people and I'll have their ****ing reptilian heads! A bunch of dumbasses who despite all available knowledge still somehow know not what they do are more infuriating than hate inducing. If they kill people I know with their dumbassery it will make me exponentially hate them more but they are still not vampires who seek their own betterment through my misery. There would still be a wide gulf between the two groups and murder would not be my go to response for them.

OccultHawk · 04-17-2020, 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord

That is an entirely different question because corporate level ****s at BK are if not lizard people then functionally lizard people and I'll have their ****ing reptilian heads! A bunch of dumbasses who despite all available knowledge still somehow know not what they do are more infuriating than hate inducing. If they kill people I know with their dumbassery it will make me exponentially hate them more but they are still not vampires who seek their own betterment through my misery. There would still be a wide gulf between the two groups and murder would not be my go to response for them.

Just so I have this straight, Faulkner, your answer is yes for the top tier echelon and no for middle management?

The Batlord · 04-17-2020, 06:25 PM

We're not talking about middle management, you twit. We're talking about lower level randos who go out cause they're bored or too lazy to feed their kids PB&J's. Stupid people, yes, but not vampires.

WWWP · 04-17-2020, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk

Automated cars have to learn to evaluate and decide trolley problems.

The tools to measure is what makes the trolley problem so that’s right but merely an illustration isn’t right when they’re made all the time. Is it worth having plane crashes in order for aviation to exist? That’s a trolley problem.

But would that even be useful? Is it worth having plane crashes in order for aviation to exist? A trolley problem doesn't answer that question.

OccultHawk · 04-17-2020, 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord

We're not talking about middle management, you twit. We're talking about lower level randos who go out cause they're bored or too lazy to feed their kids PB&J's. Stupid people, yes, but not vampires.

Ok yeah. I mean I was changing the subject for a bit. So it’s a clear yes on the corporate elite then?

OccultHawk · 04-17-2020, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WWWP

But would that even be useful? Is it worth having plane crashes in order for aviation to exist? A trolley problem doesn't answer that question.

On one track aviation and plane crashes exist on the other aviation and plane crashes do not exist. We solved, so to speak, this problem by allowing aviation to exist and therefore inevitable plane crashes.

Whatever it was with Boeing they decided the path where they didn’t pay however much for a safety feature instead of protecting the lives.