|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-09-2017, 10:04 AM | #781 (permalink) | ||
Certified H00d Classic
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bernie Sanders's yacht
Posts: 6,129
|
Trump made an interesting "left-turn" last week (no pun intended) in regards to working with Chuck Schumer and Pelosi on raising the debt ceiling, helping the hurricane victims and pushing for some kind of DACA Act. Anyone got thoughts on these developments?
__________________
Anteater's 21 Fav Albums Of 2020 Anteater's Daily Tune Roulette Quote:
Quote:
|
||
09-09-2017, 02:59 PM | #783 (permalink) | ||
Certified H00d Classic
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bernie Sanders's yacht
Posts: 6,129
|
__________________
Anteater's 21 Fav Albums Of 2020 Anteater's Daily Tune Roulette Quote:
Quote:
|
||
09-11-2017, 11:12 AM | #785 (permalink) | ||
Music Addict
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 3,320
|
Quote:
The mainstream argument advanced against DACA recipients is that they are a drain on the economy and that they take jobs that otherwise would have gone to true, blue American citizens. It makes sense to respond to that argument with economic rebuttals. Posing a hypothetical that wishes away the primary reasons for conservatives resistance to DACA is asking to hear the echo chamber answer that many of us here agree with "they're as American as you or I and it's insanity to send a kid who's spent 75% of his 16 years in the suburbs of Cleveland back to El Salvador". So, Chula: deporting DACA recipients is a foolish economic move Frown/Bat: would you still think it's bad if economics played no part/it was a wise economic move? Chula: that is both immaterial and non-demonstrable, so why should I have opinion on a set of facts that no one can show exists? Frown/Bat: you have no conviction. Quote:
__________________
One note timeless, came out of nowhere... |
||
09-11-2017, 11:18 AM | #786 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
Things can change in a heartbeat and even if they don't, statistics can be subjected to p-hacking. I think it's pretty short-sighted to only use certain types of justifications and logic when they uphold things you already support. We need to consider whether or not we're crafting a weapon for the other side to use against us. It builds this philosophy of economic sensibility being equivalent to moral superiority, which we both know is untrue as all ****.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
09-15-2017, 07:30 PM | #788 (permalink) | |
Toasted Poster
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
|
Quote:
I already noted how much moral sensibility had been granted to the subject long before the economics started coming to the forefront. But you only see what you want to see to further your ****ing self sense of yourself and how bright you think you are.
__________________
“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.” |
|
09-15-2017, 07:33 PM | #789 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
Oh you.
You're just too insecure to accept any form of criticism. I'm not even going to bother dismantling your post that 100% misses my point because you fail to see what you don't already agree with and it's just a waste of time.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
|