|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#7742 (permalink) | |
No Ice In My Bourbon
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: /dev/null
Posts: 4,327
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7743 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 4,403
|
![]()
I mean to me, if all they have to lose is face, then they would be somewhat foolish not to appoint someone.
Likely most voters aren't tuned in enough to politics to let the appearances of it really sway their vote and even if some are and they lose a few already competitive Congress seats over it .. the SC seat is worth more in the long term than those races are and the GOP is already in a spot where their long term prospects are becoming increasingly slimmer. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7744 (permalink) |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,246
|
![]()
Hearing that there's a few politically oriented considerations to be made.
1. A budget 2. This might be leverage for a lame-duck. Edit: But yes, he could do it if McConnell can convene a quorum. And Merkowski (sp?) already said eff off.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7746 (permalink) |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,246
|
![]()
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7748 (permalink) |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,246
|
![]()
No. Again assuming the votes are there. Having said that, I don't know if even that would stop them.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7750 (permalink) |
killedmyraindog
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,246
|
![]()
Ted Cruz and Tom Cotton. About 10 days ago.
__________________
I've moved to a new address |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|