Neapolitan |
05-15-2017 10:47 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggy ''Frappanised'' Zappada
(Post 1835297)
Disagreeing with him doesn't mean he was a moron, he was in fact the complete opposite.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland
(Post 1835299)
Why don't you ask him why he thinks that instead of just assuming that he doesn't like him because of disagreement?
Hitchens was intelligent in some ways but more often than not, he seemed more interested in ****-talking than in making solid points. I do the same damn thing if we're being honest.
|
If Ziggy assumes what the troll meant or was thinking he has already done twice amount of work that troll has done. So why are you whiteknighting that troll? That troll doesn't even take time to write a coherent sentence complete with capitalization and punctuation let alone bother to articulate a complete thought. Why does Ziggy have to ask the troll when the troll puts no effort into what he posts? If the troll writes **** posts why does the onus fall on the reader to know what he means or the reader has to ask what he meant before proceeding to comment?
Who cares what you think of Hitchens whether you think he is a "moron" or he is your favorite philosopher. Was there any once of truth to his statement? Unless you are willfully ignorant* to what is going on in the world you would know what Hitchens was warning us about is true. However he was a moron for leaving out the part where the flaming liberals will roll out the red carpet for the islamists jihadists.
edit:
I meant to say "willfully ignorant," a term I heard Gavin McInnes use, instead of "willfully blind," a term I saw riseagainstrocks use.
|