Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/)
-   -   Science! (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/88269-science.html)

Lucem Ferre 04-12-2019 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dharma & Greg (Post 2051913)
I scoff at people who claim destiny as if it were a conscious entity or magical force guiding their lives like God or astrology. And "I don't know" isn't a reasonable stance to stop at because it ignores the reality that believing one and not the other influences how society views itself and their actions resulting from that, and being agnostic is tantamount to believing in free will because you're just going to accept the status quo which is belief in free will. All the circle jerk rationalist garbage in the world isn't going to make you woke.

But destiny wouldn't be a 'magical' force since it would be natural. Same with free will if it existed.

If anything it's YOU who are trying to sound 'woke' with the 'I know free will doesn't exist' bull****. And, again, it's calling things 'magical' or throwing preconceived notions of what I believe being you using ad hominem to cover up the fact that you don't know because you can't take the fact that you don't know. It's the equivalent of me claiming that you don't want to believe in free will because it makes the self imposed doom of humanity more digestible if you think it was destiny rather than choice.

I don't believe in free will. I've said that already on here plenty of times. I'm not going to claim that I know free will doesn't exist and I'm not going to pretend it's a fact to fit my own beliefs. That's just grossly narcissistic and masturbatory to claim that you know, it's fact and that anybody that believes in free will just wants to feel 'magical' or 'isn't there yet'.

The Batlord 04-12-2019 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 2051917)
Kinda been my question for a while now mate.

Which you contradict by saying things like "I feel like I have a choice between picking up and not picking up a piece of paper" like some damn Christian.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre (Post 2051918)
But destiny wouldn't be a 'magical' force since it would be natural. Same with free will if it existed.

Okay?

Frownland 04-12-2019 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dharma & Greg (Post 2051919)
Which you contradict by saying things like "I feel like I have a choice between picking up and not picking up a piece of paper" like some damn Christian.

I never said that. I said that the option to do both exists because they are physically possible to perform.

DwnWthVwls 04-12-2019 12:26 PM

Do you believe free will is possible at all? Not for humans, just in the general sense. Can an all knowing all powerful entity experience free will?

Lucem Ferre 04-12-2019 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 2051921)
I never said that. I said that the option to do both exists because they are physically possible to perform.

Not being able to change the past is obvious evidence that you don't decide the future, duh Frownland.

Lucem Ferre 04-12-2019 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls (Post 2051922)
Do you believe free will is possible at all? Not for humans, just in the general sense. Can an all knowing all powerful entity experience free will?

By their definition it has to be something that acts out of pure randomness that has no cause and effect relationship to it's choices. Something where literally nothing it does matters. (not in a philosophical way) In fact, perhaps it couldn't even be conscious of what it's doing.

DwnWthVwls 04-12-2019 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dharma & Greg (Post 2051913)
I scoff at people who claim destiny as if it were a conscious entity or magical force guiding their lives like God or astrology. And "I don't know" isn't a reasonable stance to stop at because it ignores the reality that believing one and not the other influences how society views itself and their actions resulting from that, and being agnostic is tantamount to believing in free will because you're just going to accept the status quo which is belief in free will. All the circle jerk rationalist garbage in the world isn't going to make you woke.

This is all poopoo that reminds me of the matrix argument. It doesnt matter if we actually have free will. We experience the world as if we do and govern our existence based on the general human experience. Even if everyone became woke it wouldnt change anything because according to you we are literally incapable of making a choice to change our behavior. Thats quite the paradox youve created in your little woke bubble.

The Batlord 04-12-2019 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 2051921)
I never said that. I said that the option to do both exists because they are physically possible to perform.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls (Post 2051922)
Do you believe free will is possible at all? Not for humans, just in the general sense. Can an all knowing all powerful entity experience free will?

Saying that you can't know that free will exists is pointless. On a purely logical level of course you can't know anymore than you can know that god exists or that we're not living in the Matrix. You can hold an agnostic view in an academic sense but you're still going to believe one or the other because that's simply how minds work. You can't hold a purely agnostic view. Either you believe in free will or you don't.

Saying that you can't know that free will exists or doesn't exist is like prefacing your opinion that X musical artist with "In my opinion". It doesn't add anything to the discussion. It just wastes time. You can believe that musical taste is subjective but you're still going to believe that an artist is either good or bad.

The Batlord 04-12-2019 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls (Post 2051925)
This is all poopoo that reminds me of the matrix argument. It doesnt matter if we actually have free will. We experience the world as if we do and govern our existence based on the general human experience. Even if everyone became woke it wouldnt change anything because according to you we are literally incapable of making a choice to change our behavior. Thats quite the paradox youve created in your little woke bubble.

It's not a paradox. If everyone stopped believing in free will that would influence how we view and run society. It wouldn't be a choice, it would simply be emergent, but it would quite possibly result in a society that runs on a more accurate view of how the world works.

DwnWthVwls 04-12-2019 12:41 PM

I believe i dont know if free will does or doesnt exist and dont care one way or the other. Prove me wrong. Ive never even thought about it until this discussion came up.

Frownland 04-12-2019 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dharma & Greg (Post 2051926)
Saying that you can't know that free will exists is pointless. On a purely logical level of course you can't know anymore than you can know that god exists or that we're not living in the Matrix. You can hold an agnostic view in an academic sense but you're still going to believe one or the other because that's simply how minds work. You can't hold a purely agnostic view. Either you believe in free will or you don't.

The majority of the arguments for the existence of god can easily be countered in a falsifiable manner. I don't see any of that scientific rigor behind your position.

I also don't agree with the assertion that free will can only exist if it's absolute. I also vehemently disagree with the assertion that free will can only exist if decision-making is entirely random because that would be a form of determinism in itself. I've explained this to you several times, so if you don't get it you're clearly just not there yet.

Quote:

Saying that you can't know that free will exists or doesn't exist is like prefacing your opinion that X musical artist with "In my opinion". It doesn't add anything to the discussion. It just wastes time. You can believe that musical taste is subjective but you're still going to believe that an artist is either good or bad.
The fact that you have to rely so heavily on false analogies, false equivalencies, strawmanning, and goalpost moving to support your position should tell you that your position isn't as concrete as you're presenting it to be.

Lucem Ferre 04-12-2019 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dharma & Greg (Post 2051927)
It's not a paradox. If everyone stopped believing in free will that would influence how we view and run society. It wouldn't be a choice, it would simply be emergent, but it would quite possibly result in a society that runs on a more accurate view of how the world works.

No, it's a paradox. The whole concept is riddled with paradoxes from both sides.

There's a huge difference between 'I believe' and 'I know' which is what is being argued against. OH said that he knows free will doesn't exist because it's proven. We can argue over the merit over it just don't act like merit over it.

Lucem Ferre 04-12-2019 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 2051930)
The majority of the arguments for the existence of god can easily be countered in a falsifiable manner. I don't see any of that scientific rigor behind your position.

I also don't agree with the assertion that free will can only exist if it's absolute. I also vehemently disagree with the assertion that free will can only exist if decision-making is entirely random because that would be a form of determinism in itself. I've explained this to you several times, so if you don't get it you're clearly just not there yet.

We've both made this point several times. Never seemed to be acknowledged.

Edit: You can argue that choice is predicated on the influence of consequence. Where a rock being thrown is only reacting to the past, a conscious being making a choice is reacting to what it predicts to be the future.

DwnWthVwls 04-12-2019 12:59 PM

Im still waiting for batlord to tell me the default position for the claim “free will doesnt exist”. He seems to thhink taking the opposite side of the claim is the default so i guess free will does exist.

Lucem Ferre 04-12-2019 01:29 PM

Seriously though, they should stop saying "I chose to" and start saying "I was destined to".

OccultHawk 04-12-2019 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dharma & Greg (Post 2051905)
Plenty of crackheads probably felt they could fly until they couldn't. Why on earth would you think how you "feel" is in any way meaningful. I think OH is right and you're simply "not there" yet.

Took you long enough

Lucem Ferre 04-12-2019 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 2051940)
Took you long enough

It took the universe long enough to bring him to that point, you mean?

DwnWthVwls 04-12-2019 02:50 PM

the gangs almost all here. Where is grindy?

Lucem Ferre 04-12-2019 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls (Post 2051946)
the gangs almost all here. Where is grindy?

I don't know, he isn't destined to be here though.

Oriphiel 04-12-2019 07:30 PM

https://boxden.com/smilies/tv6aijN.png

DwnWthVwls 04-12-2019 09:04 PM

No selfies in science thread please.

grindy 04-13-2019 02:49 AM

:wave:

rostasi 04-17-2019 03:01 PM

Scientists Restore Some Function In The Brains Of Dead Pigs (suids, not cops).

Frownland 04-20-2019 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mindfulness

Rocks Are Actually Soft and Squishy, They Just Tense Up When We Touch Them

debaserr 04-23-2019 11:39 PM

https://gizmodo.com/fossilized-human...nti-1834222964

DwnWthVwls 04-24-2019 07:33 PM


rostasi 04-25-2019 08:24 AM

^^^^^^ That was very cool.


Oriphiel 04-28-2019 05:37 AM

Dear scientists

Please explain this


grindy 05-13-2019 12:48 PM


debaserr 05-16-2019 10:48 AM

Elon hopes global broadband satellite internet network can help fund SpaceX

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/15/musk...t-capital.html

Quote:

Elon tweeted "Starlink mission will be the heaviest Space X payload 18.5 tons. If all goes well, each launch of 60 satellites will generate more power than the Space Station & deliver 1 terabit of bandwidth to Earth."

Musk said SpaceX will need six more launches, with 60 satellites per launch, to get “minor coverage” for the internet network. A dozen launches, or 720 satellites, would bump the network to “moderate” coverage,”

The company will continue to develop and advance Starlink as the program continues, Musk promised. SpaceX plans to rapidly deploy Starlink, scaling its production and launch rate to between 1,000 satellites to 2,000 satellites per year. If SpaceX is able to stick to its current Starlink schedule, Musk said “SpaceX will have the majority of satellites” in orbit around the Earth within two years.

The satellite constellations expect to offer broadband speeds comparable to fiber optic networks, according to federal documents, by essentially creating a blanket connection across the electromagnetic spectrum. The satellites would offer new direct-to-consumer wireless connections, rather than the present system’s redistribution of signals.

Musk said SpaceX does not think it is “going to be displacing” traditional, ground-based telecommunications networks with Starlink. Instead, he thinks the space-based network “will actually work well” with telecommunications companies because it reaches sparsely populated regions. While Starlink “has not signed up any customers,” Musk said SpaceX is talking to “possible strategic partners,” such as telecommunications companies.

DwnWthVwls 05-16-2019 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grindy (Post 2056421)

Hannah is <3. Cool video.

grindy 05-17-2019 12:36 AM

Yeah, she's awesome.

OccultHawk 05-18-2019 05:50 PM

Of course human anatomy and physiology/ biology is a science

The Batlord 05-18-2019 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mindfulness (Post 2057071)
my human biology book is 600 pages :yikes: and the first homework assignment has 50 questions. i can post the questions on here if anyones interested on what the course goes over. you can tell me which ones are wrong and i can google further and come to and decision to change my answer :pimp:

its science, about the human body. it counts as my science credit :cool:

We're not doing your homework for you, mister. Nice try though.

debaserr 05-21-2019 12:51 AM

NSFWish

Spoiler for hide:
Bonobos, a primate close to humans, is highly sexed and uses sexuality as a means of maintaining social order

https://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...icle-1.1273287

"The range of activities includes mouth-to-mouth kissing, oral sex, genital caressing by hand, penis-fencing by two males, male-on-male mounting, and genito-genital rubbing by two estrous females, who smoosh their swollen vulvas back and forth against each other in a spate of feverish sisterly cordiality. Usually there's no orgasm culminating these activities,"

DwnWthVwls 05-31-2019 06:11 PM

Aerogel

Plankton 06-04-2019 12:30 PM

https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net...6a&oe=5D547F85

The Batlord 06-04-2019 04:33 PM

Boooo!

Plankton 06-05-2019 11:17 AM

You got something against Red Shift?

OccultHawk 06-05-2019 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 2059775)
I don't get it

The wavelength of light as its source moves toward you or away you from turns from blue to red. It’s called red shift when you’re looking at stars. If the star looks red it’s moving away from earth. Sound vibrations do the same thing by compacting and then stretching out. That’s why sirens sound how they sound depending on where the ambulance is.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:00 PM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.