What Did President Trump Do Now?

Anteater · 07-11-2017, 11:50 PM

Well at least I learned today that collusion is fine as long as you get away with it. Woohoo!

Lucem Ferre · 07-11-2017, 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland

What a bulletproof justification. Solid and wholly necessary post there mr dude.

Meant for Chula but it still applies. Take to PM boys.

How are they supposed to get validation from their peers of they do this privately?

**Frownland** · 07-11-2017, 11:51 PM

More PMs. I like this thread. Don't ruin it y'all.

Anteater · 07-11-2017, 11:54 PM

This thread is tons of fun since there's a news article about Trump being published online every 5 minutes or something.

OccultHawk · 07-12-2017, 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland

More PMs. I like this thread. Don't ruin it y'all.

Anyone who goes crying to a mod is a snitch bitch

djchameleon · 07-12-2017, 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland

If immigration is a federally handled issue, then any immigration laws issued by smaller forms of government are unconstitutional

.

That isn't true. States and local levels don't HAVE to assist ICE agents. ICE agents can still come in and do their own raids but it isn't unconstitutional.

Quote:

Thus the question: Are state and local governments required to help the feds enforce federal law? In a word: No.

The term "sanctuary cities" is not a legal term, but it has been applied by those in government and the media to describe municipalities that offer expanded social services to the undocumented and decline to help the feds find them — including the case of Chicago's offering undocumented immigrants money for legal fees to resist federal deportation. As unwise as these expenditures may be by cities that are essentially bankrupt and rely on federal largesse in order to remain in the black, they are not unlawful. Cities and towns are free to expand the availability of social services however they please, taking into account the local political climate.

https://www.creators.com/read/judge-...y-cities-legal

**Frownland** · 07-12-2017, 06:05 AM

Tfw smaller governments making laws that only the federal government can make is inherently unconstitutional.

The precedent

OccultHawk · 07-12-2017, 06:16 AM

Got 'em!

Anteater · 07-12-2017, 08:09 AM

djchameleon · 07-12-2017, 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland

Tfw smaller governments making laws that only the federal government can make is inherently unconstitutional.

The precedent

Except that only applies to states and not local municipalities.

07-11-2017, 11:51 PM	#5743 (permalink)
Frownland SOPHIE FOREVER Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: East of the Southern North American West Posts: 35,541	More PMs. I like this thread. Don't ruin it y'all. __________________ Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. d e a f b o x

07-12-2017, 06:05 AM	#5747 (permalink)
Frownland SOPHIE FOREVER Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: East of the Southern North American West Posts: 35,541	Tfw smaller governments making laws that only the federal government can make is inherently unconstitutional. The precedent __________________ Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. d e a f b o x

07-12-2017, 06:16 AM	#5748 (permalink)
OccultHawk one-balled nipple jockey Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Dirty Souf Biatch Posts: 22,006	Got 'em! __________________ 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Member of the Year & Journal of the Year Champion Behold the Writing of THE LEGEND: https://www.musicbanter.com/members-...p-lighter.html