Neapolitan

I never said Obama was the champion and protector of the average muslim family living in the middle East. Basically from what I heard through credible news sources that he has possible links and acts in favor of extreme/militant islamists. Besides militant islamists target muslims as well as Christians and Yazidis, so speaking against militants in no way entails speaking against muslims or Mid-Eastern people.

And since you brought up drone strikes. That is a non-issue in the news, but I am sure it will soon become an issue for Donald Trump.

Exactly, Saddam spelled his name as صدام حسين عبد المجيد التكريتي and American voters are suppose to say "hey look Obama's middle name is the same as Saddam's last name." You're right it doesn't make sense. That is what I was trying to tell Kiiii.

I really don't know what it means, but in light of other things he said and his track record, I guess he means in a conflict between the West versus extreme islamists he would side with the latter.

__________________

kibbeh

i underlined all the parts of your argument that make no sense

__________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o2u2p1FzNM

kibbeh

first you quote obama saying he's on the muslim's side then you don't deny the fact that he has been bombing the **** out of muslims for the past what, 8 years?

you say drones are a non-issue in the news??? i don't care about the news. who said anything about the news??? drones are not a 'non-issue' drones have killed so many people and are, to anybody with an ounce of humanity, a HUGE ****ing issue.

also i mentioned how saddam spells his name is irrelevant not to imply that people wouldn't compare him to obama, because that's stupid. people aren't gonna worry about spelling, its the same name.

__________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o2u2p1FzNM

Neapolitan

Drone strikes are not reported even though there are causalities of non-combatants, and it's something Barrack Obama choose to do in lieu of ground troops.

__________________

Neapolitan

I didn't deny he bombed muslims.

I didn't say lives of innocent people don't matter. I meant that to respect what the news thinks is important, drone strikes is not one of them. It is a "non issue" relative to those who control the information through major media. If drone strikes were in the news front and center people would stop hero worshiping Barrack as someone who does no wrong.

__________________

kibbeh

^ i knew it was about american muslims. because that actually makes sense unlike what nea is suggesting.

__________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o2u2p1FzNM

Neapolitan

Not true.

__________________

Neapolitan

Still doesn't disprove that Obama doesn't act in favor of militant islamists who also are stone cold killer of muslims.

__________________

djchameleon

He might have been raised by atheists but he was a Christian and attended church weekly in Chicago. He didn't just become Christian for his presidential run.


Just because you chose to ignore all of the news articles about it doesn't make it a non issue in the news.

Obama's Embrace of Drone Strikes Will Be a Lasting Legacy - NYTimes.com

https://www.thebureauinvestigates.co...-inauguration/

Obama reveals how many civilians died in U.S. drone attacks | PBS NewsHour

Even though that number is bull**** and way under reported.

Obama-led drone strikes kill innocents 90% of the time: report - Washington Times

I can continue to link you to articles for days leading back to 2010. If you chose to stick your head in the sand and ignore all of the reports about drone strikes then go ahead but don't say it was a non issue in the news.

__________________

Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes.

Neapolitan

Because I called the major media out on the carpet over this, you are accusing me for burring my head in the sand -- doesn't make sense. During the Bush years the death toll was enumerated on the evening news. This is not the case with Obama. Off the top of you head from what you remember hearing on the news, and without looking up information on the internet tell me what the death toll is for non combatants killed as a result of drone strikes?

How do those links compare to what is stressed on major news outlets? The NYTimes link is an opinion piece from a Twitter and the hyperlink address clearly states what it is "room for debate" not NYTiimes front page news. The
"Bureau of Investigative Journalism" is an independent not-for-profit organization not a major news outlet. PBS only show that the Obama administration is reporting a number less than claimed by human rights groups -- so much for Obama's adminstration transparency. The Washington Post mentions the rate of "unintended death" was obtained through leaked intelligence documents suggesting that information was secretive. They leak "secrets" they don't leak common knowledge.

Show me where CNN harped on this to the point where Obama's approval rating dropped.

While on the subject of drone attacks:
Hillary Clinton considered drone attack on Julian Assange - report

__________________