|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-05-2017, 02:21 PM | #3741 (permalink) | |
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
Quote:
|
|
04-05-2017, 02:38 PM | #3742 (permalink) | |
Toasted Poster
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
|
Quote:
__________________
“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.” |
|
04-06-2017, 12:32 PM | #3744 (permalink) | |
A.B.N.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 11,451
|
They voted on Gorsuch. Couldn't get it passed so they decided to change the rules to push him through anyways.
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/04/0...rt-senate.html It's kind of funny how during Trump's campaign trail he was bitching and moaning that Hillary would elect someone to Supreme Court that would take away people's guns. This is the person that he ends up putting into the Supreme Court that doesn't give two ****s about the every day person and has consistently sided with big corporations over the worker.
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes. Quote:
|
|
04-06-2017, 02:01 PM | #3745 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
Gorsuch is a great judge though because he is more concerned with legal aspects of things than his moral siding. "A judge that likes the outcomes of all of his verdicts is likely not a good judge." That's a step up from Scalia for sure, who thought that sometimes it's okay to be inconsistent.
I get the bitterness revolving SC judges because of Merrick Garland, but the Dems need to grow the **** up and not pretend that two wrongs make a right.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
04-06-2017, 02:06 PM | #3747 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
Defo. And the other side too. This childishness is leading to a dangerous precedent that will only make party politics more divisive. And to think that te senate is supposed to be the ****ing grown up in the room.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
04-06-2017, 02:08 PM | #3748 (permalink) |
.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,153
|
That's how it's been for a while though, and if we know anything about the parties representing America, they'll stick to old fashioned tradition. I mean, it pretty much shows everything when the Republican party are the only one standing and clapping when their Republican president is speaking. Same goes for Dems. It's just a bunch of immaturity and childish games between them.
|
04-06-2017, 02:12 PM | #3749 (permalink) | |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
Quote:
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
|
|