Bannon was easy to vilify.

Let the in-fighting begin in earnest.

They voted on Gorsuch. Couldn't get it passed so they decided to change the rules to push him through anyways.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/04/0...rt-senate.html

It's kind of funny how during Trump's campaign trail he was bitching and moaning that Hillary would elect someone to Supreme Court that would take away people's guns. This is the person that he ends up putting into the Supreme Court that doesn't give two ****s about the every day person and has consistently sided with big corporations over the worker.

Gorsuch is a great judge though because he is more concerned with legal aspects of things than his moral siding. "A judge that likes the outcomes of all of his verdicts is likely not a good judge." That's a step up from Scalia for sure, who thought that sometimes it's okay to be inconsistent.

I get the bitterness revolving SC judges because of Merrick Garland, but the Dems need to grow the **** up and not pretend that two wrongs make a right.

Dems need to grow up period. I mean let's be honest.

Defo. And the other side too. This childishness is leading to a dangerous precedent that will only make party politics more divisive. And to think that te senate is supposed to be the ****ing grown up in the room.

That's how it's been for a while though, and if we know anything about the parties representing America, they'll stick to old fashioned tradition. I mean, it pretty much shows everything when the Republican party are the only one standing and clapping when their Republican president is speaking. Same goes for Dems. It's just a bunch of immaturity and childish games between them.

Kind of. Remember when there would be bipartisan support for things sometimes in the past? Ja, that's gonna remain in the past unless we have some serious changes.

Well not only that, but if some changes aren't made, the government will be nothing but a laughing stock. You know it's a new era when comedians are more up to their facts than the media.