I...actually agree with both of these.

I don't. Not at all.

*cough* Pulitzer Prize for journalism *cough*

Frownland responds with his typical, "awards don't mean credibility" BS in 5... 4... 3... 2...

Ant responds with something along the lines of "the Pulitzer's are liberal leaning".....


And YES. Let's talk about the whole Flynn thing. This is freaking HUGE.

Chula buys into the bs instead of adding anything to the conversation like "I disgaree and here's why:"... :D

HuffPost caters to liberal propaganda. No doubt about that.

:finger::finger:

The HP does not get involved with propaganda. They just report the facts from a liberal standpoint. They are miles above MSNBC, Fox, and Breitbart in actual credibility.

I don't even need to talk about the Pulitzer Prize. Go read some of those HuffPost headlines - they make Fox News look like C-SPAN.

I'll be following the Flynn Fallout with great interest.

Convenient.

Headlines are like the pretty frosting flowers on top of a cake. Bottom line: how good is the cake as a whole?

You and me both. We're dipping our toes into some new water here and it's equal parts interesting and unsettling.

This sounds like something Goofle would say about Breitbart.

Have I ever said anything about the credibility of right leaning news sites? Or Breitbart specifically? Nope. Every outlet has its own agenda, people just agree with some more than others.

Quite sure I've seen you defend Breitbart as a credible news source before.