You do understand that the reasons i gave for my skepticism would hold up in our justice system as an acceptable motive?

It's the exact reason why I'm giving you so much ****.

On a side note, I had to fly to NYC (LaGuardia) right after they lifted the ban to meet with a customer. The Twin Tower site was still smoldering. Every time one of the pilots had to leave the cockpit to use the john the flight attendants would block the front of the aisle with the drink cart. Was a whole new reality.

So you think acknowledging motives are a bad thing when seeking truth/justice?

Of course not, but they shouldn't override your faith in the truth when it's overwhelmingly supported by evidence.

Was kind of hoping you'd actually have something to contribute to the conversation.. :rolleyes:

You can call it evidence until you're blue in the face, but the only people who know the truth are the people involved. We have no way of absolutely knowing.. I want evidence of innocence for those with reasonable motive, until then I reserve the right to be skeptical, but I don't think they should be prosecuted or anything because I support innocent until proven guilty.

Edit: You seem to think that because it's our government and not some joe shmoe court case that skepticism is irrational.

I kinda skip some posts. I'll respond later.

@ Chula - Hilarious to comment on Islamic terror and use US statistics to justify the lack of a threat. There's probably not too many IRA bombings in Senegal either.

.

Thanks, I'm on my phone atm so I'd rather wait.