Flat Earth Uprising?

P A N · 01-10-2017, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland

Source? Something that details the methodology please, since that is very important.

P A N · 01-10-2017, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland

Also, info on how the methods of the data used to prove DWV's point are incorrect would be very useful too.

i didn't really catch a point there.

**Frownland** · 01-10-2017, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by P A N

i didn't really catch a point there.

What makes this evidence invalid but not yours?

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls

If you looked at my links our Solar System has a tail.. It's pretty freakin awesome.

DwnWthVwls · 01-10-2017, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by P A N

GPS would actually work better and more cheaply than on a globe earth, because radio waves travel in straight lines. those vertical structures with all the cell tech on them would do a real tidy job. do i need to be an expert on quarks to think about the shape of the earth? i do have a general understanding of pressure and atoms though. if you'd like to talk about why i need that, feel free.

No, you don't have to be an expert on any of my examples to talk about flat earth. I was questioning your thoughts on those things because much like the examples provided from space science all we have is experimentation, data, and cartoons to explain how they work. You seem to have drawn an arbitrary line where space science is bunk, but other science is okay.

P A N · 01-10-2017, 05:02 PM

i'll be back after some more time. this gets really exhausting.

DwnWthVwls · 01-10-2017, 05:06 PM

Awww... im still high and bored

Frown you wanna argue about vaccines and human rights violations?

riseagainstrocks · 01-10-2017, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by P A N

i'll be back after some more time. this gets really exhausting.

You can't make a claim, ask for rebuttal, dismiss millennia of evidence and logic, and then play the misunderstood martyr.

exhausting

P A N · 01-10-2017, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls

No, you don't have to be an expert on any of my examples to talk about flat earth. I was questioning your thoughts on those things, because much like the examples provided from space science all we have is experimentation, data, and cartoons to explain how they work.

really though? so when nasa says they've found a planet in a neighbouring solar system which hold a planet possibly like earth, and they tell you they can tell it's a bit like earth because they've told you they can tell what gases are on its surface because of the way it wobbles or because of infrared this or that, you believe it's experimentation? or is it that you believe they are funded enough that this must be what they're doing with their time? or is it possible you believe they are even capable of that for no other reason than that you were told they do, and that you've been provided images on a consistent basis throughout the entirety of your formative years?

**Frownland** · 01-10-2017, 05:07 PM

At least we weren't a buncha meanies about it this time!

P A N · 01-10-2017, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland

What makes this evidence invalid but not yours?

cuz that one is a cartoon. mine are not.

01-10-2017, 05:07 PM	#639 (permalink)
Frownland SOPHIE FOREVER Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: East of the Southern North American West Posts: 35,541	At least we weren't a buncha meanies about it this time! __________________ Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. d e a f b o x

01-10-2017, 05:02 PM	#635 (permalink)
P A N DO LIKE YOU. Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 629	i'll be back after some more time. this gets really exhausting.