Chula Vista

It's scientific theory, of which there are many. After Einstein developed his Theory of Relativity the scientific community have taken gravity as fact even though it can't really be proven.

If I tell you that water is wet would you ask me to prove it?

Again, don't be dense just for the sake of maintaining a stupid talking point.

__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”

P A N

well, why are you participating in the thread? i'm looking to see two things here. one is if people actually have any idea how they came to believe we live on a ball flying through space at a gajillion miles an hour. the other is if the earth is - as i suspect - flat.

there is no shortage of people willing to enlighten me with phrases such as "the earth is not flat." believe me. it's just redundant to inundate threads like this with such unoriginal lines. so, enlighten me with facts. show me what i asked to see. otherwise, i can only assume that - like me - you are not able to do so.

the reason i'm asking for an example of a gaseous system existing within a vacuous expanse without the aid of a barrier is because as far as i can find, there is no other example of this other than earth. i'm not claiming this is a reason - in and of itself - to believe the earth is flat either. i'm just taking this one step at a time.

Key

Let's see:

Astronauts
Moon landing
Astronomy class
Common sense

Read a damn book. Again, this theory has been debunked so many times it's hard to count. You're continuous interest in this is mind boggling.

If you believe the earth is in fact flat, you really are as dense as Chula claims.

P A N

admitting gravity can't be proven is good.

no, i wouldn't ask you to prove water is wet because i can prove it myself. i don't require faith in doctrines to know that it is wet.

i am dense and i can't do anything about it. it's why i'm stuck to the ground.

P A N

i'll just wait for someone with a little more conviction, i think.

the question, again, is as follows:

can a situation or experiment be cited as evidence that an enclosed system of gases can exist within a vacuous surrounding without a barrier or seal?

Blank.

The larger an object the stronger it's gravitational pull. That's all there really is to it. That's the theory.

P A N

actually, i won't opt out of this because it's actually relevant. i just didn't see it at first.

astronots, on a flat earth, cannot exist as we believe them to. the entire space program exists to fake the globe earth, and funnel billions of tax dollars.

moon landing: see above.

astronomy class: if the earth is flat, it should be fairly evident what vast efforts would have to be put forth to get the whole world to believe it. the education system would logically have to be an essential part of that.

common sense: common sense can be created in at least two ways. one is trauma-based learning, wherein students are punished for failure to adapt to ideas that do not come naturally to them. the other is observation, wherein we see what we know with our eyes and other sense. in the second instance, theoretical physics does not exist, and the earth appears flat.

Key

K. I'm done. This is ****ing stupid.

Blank.

Humour me. Where would this money go? Why has no investigator ever noticed billion... or is it trillions? Being smuggled out of NASA?

P A N

i lay no claims to knowledge of that, but i would guess it's military science and propaganda.

the investigators, i would suspect, can only get so close. there are lots of ways to launder money, especially if you are part of the organization who owns the law.

it doesn't really matter if i'm correct or not. not to me anyway.