Key

Explain. What would you consider a reliable source of information?

Frownland

Nothing is entirely reliable, but Wall Street Journal, NPR, and Forbes all get my approval. Also, Huffington Post is basically a left-wing Breitbart in that it uses clickbait like a mother****er.

__________________

Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Key

So then your point is irrelevant based on people's take on what they consider reliable. Especially when the links provided by dj and myself have quotes to prove the cases.

Frownland

There's not being 1000% reliable and then there's being almost satirically biased. The Huffington Post falls into the second part.

__________________

Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Key

But then you have people using Fox News as a reliable source, and I've not seen any argument toward that line of reasoning.

Frownland

Wha...? I never said Fox was a reliable source. Other people using a ****ty source does not justify using one yourself. In fact, that might actually inspire you to use more reliable ones.

Are we really debating whether or not it's a good idea to use stronger evidence?

__________________

Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Chula Vista

Ki, HPost is as left as Fox News is right. You should never quote them or use them to try and prove a point. I've relied on Politifact for this election. They are the Snopes of politics. They go both ways in clearing up what's true and what's not.

__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”

Key

That wasn't the point I was trying to make, the question was relating to examples of Trump's racism, and HuffPost have the evidence to prove that point. Whether it's agreeable or not, it's been laid out multiple times.

Frownland

And when you use an unreliable source, as that article very very very very clearly demonstrates (since case by case is the best way to determine these things) it does NOT prove your point, because those points are not as strong as you assume them to be (I'm going with the theory that you didn't look at your own evidence).

__________________

Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth.

Key

Fair enough.

Unsure if Bat realizes I have him on ignore and everything he says I can't see. It's actually nice to be honest.