Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/)
-   -   hillary clinton 4 prez (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/86583-hillary-clinton-4-prez.html)

Key 09-26-2016 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by William_the_Bloody (Post 1749750)
Yep, I don't know why people would get there hopes up for a narcissist bull$hitting conman though. He was probably thinking "I've got this. It will be as easy as the primaries"

Clinton may be corrupt, but she is also very studious.

She fought the urge to fight back and that's admirable.

William_the_Bloody 09-26-2016 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ki (Post 1749752)
She fought the urge to fight back and that's admirable.

Yes she did what she had to do, there were no knock out punches but I think she clearly won the first debate, which is normally the most important one.

Key 09-26-2016 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by William_the_Bloody (Post 1749772)
Yes she did what she had to do, there were no knock out punches but I think she clearly won the first debate, which is normally the most important one.

Easily. Though I think it's more the case that Trump lost over Hillary winning. He was idiotic.

djchameleon 09-27-2016 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1749570)
Idgaf about Trump's tax returns. Enough bs obstructionism, Hillary.

Yeah, I don't really. I also don't give a fuck about the emails anymore. Move on from that BS.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ki (Post 1749636)
I still don't know who the **** to vote for.

Just write in whoever you want and vote. I'm voting for Archer Sterling.
Also wtf. Most people by the time debates roll around already know who they are going to vote for one way or the other. I know that are a few undecided people but meh. The debates aren't really for deciding who you will vote for. It's purely for entertainment. Everything they say is going to be off and just pandering to get you to vote for them without going into details about their policies. I guess go to a fact checking site and use that as a way to see who you want to vote for or just write in a fictional character.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1blankmind (Post 1749648)
I think they both came prepared. It's just trump sucks at this more politically correct personality he's trying to do now.

They did both come prepared. The only difference is that Hillary did mock debates while Trump just met with Guilliani and a few people behind doors to go over bullet points/talking points instead of going into depth but he likes it that way. He rather not prepare too much he's said in the past.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ki (Post 1749651)
Trump came ill prepared. He treated this like a rally, and not an official debate.

He's going to treat all of the debates the same way. Just go over bullet points to prep and not take it seriously enough to do mock debates. He thinks of it as preparing too much haha.:rofl:

Key 09-27-2016 12:12 AM

^if you consider Trump prepared during that debate, we must not have been watching the same debate.

djchameleon 09-27-2016 12:14 AM

I don't have to consider it, I know he did. I watch the news and Guiliana admitted to prepping with him along with a few others. Yes the results of it doesn't look that great but that's the time of prepping he did. He just glossed over bullet points. I could especially tell when he got to the Stop and Frisk part. It seemed extremely coached and of course Guiliana would give him those stats to back up those statements.

Frownland 09-27-2016 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ki (Post 1749787)
^if you consider Trump prepared during that debate, we must not have been watching the same debate.

Dude, have you seen him speak at his rallies? This is the most coherent I've seen him since his big foreign policy speech.

Key 09-27-2016 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1749790)
Dude, have you seen him speak at his rallies? This is the most coherent I've seen him since his big foreign policy speech.

Being more prepared than his rallies doesn't mean he was prepared to debate. He set a low bar to begin with.

His back pedaling and constant interruptions and bickering are proof that all he wanted to do was argue. He contradicted himself during the debate so he wasn't even sure wtf he was talking about.

djchameleon 09-27-2016 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ki (Post 1749793)
Being more prepared than his rallies doesn't mean he was prepared to debate. He set a low bar to begin with.

His back pedaling and constant interruptions and bickering are proof that all he wanted to do was argue. He contradicted himself during the debate so he wasn't even sure wtf he was talking about.

You could tell he was nervous and also he had a cold. He kept sniffling.

He was also repeating himself a few times and tripping up on certain things and wording things oddly.

Key 09-27-2016 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon (Post 1749797)
You could tell he was nervous and also he had a cold. He kept sniffling.

Oh boo hoo. You expect me to feel sorry for him?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:36 PM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.