You really are ignorant.

Of course she did. So didn't Bush and Colin Powell during the buildup to the Irag war which was proven to be one big lie. Neither of them were charged with a crime because of it either.

Charged with a crime.

What the **** part of this do you guys not get?

It was never about that, it was about you saying she was innocent of the charges, which to my knowledge, she hasn't been proven innocent.

Can we all quit with the name calling.

Capone was charged with crimes and brought to trial but manged to get off.

Clinton has never been charged with a crime and therefore never brought trial.

One of these things is not like the other. Didn't you learn how that works when you were watching Sesame Street as a kid?

She isn't innocent of the charges. They were found to not be criminal.

Finally, somebody is understanding what I'm getting at here.

I never said innocent because that word doesn't even belong in the discussion.

And what charges Ki? She's never been charged with anything.

*snort*

Smooth, Chula. Real smooth.

Please for the love of God, read my posts before you continue because once again, I was arguing with your insinuation about her innocence, which she isn't. And if she's not proven innocent, what would you call somebody that isn't innocent. Let's see here...

Doesn't want name calling, then makes an insult.

The point is that they tried to get him several times, but failed. So by the logic you employ to hilary, she is a good person that has done nothing wrong because they failed to acquit her.