|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-08-2015, 12:40 PM | #1 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: May 2012
Location: North Alabama via New Orleans
Posts: 149
|
If 50% of all interstate traffic deaths...
were discovered to (over a 50 year study) be the result of drivers from the following seven states:
Arizona Indiana Maryland Massachusetts Missouri Tennessee Washington Would it be prudent for a highway patrolman to watch a car with one of these 7 plates a bit more closely? Would you be more cautious when encountering a car on the interstate bearing the license plate of one of these 7? Or do you feel it is something no one should be concerned with at all? If you choose to answer any or all, please also provide the reason for your answer. |
10-08-2015, 02:14 PM | #2 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
Link up the study. I feel like there would be ****loads of confounding factors in this, especially the way that you phrased it making it seem like it's strictly numerically based and not per capita.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
10-08-2015, 03:03 PM | #4 (permalink) |
Aficionado of Fine Filth
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: You don't want to look in there.
Posts: 6,886
|
That was my first thought for first place on that list.
Followed by New York in second place. |
10-08-2015, 05:07 PM | #6 (permalink) | |
Aficionado of Fine Filth
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: You don't want to look in there.
Posts: 6,886
|
Quote:
Still, it just doesn't seem right without NJ & NY at the top of the list. |
|
|