|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-09-2016, 10:30 AM | #151 (permalink) |
Brain Licker
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,083
|
I think the take away from Michigan is that if we participate and get people to vote and join the movement and be active in it, Bernie can win the states.
There are super delegates turning, too, some of them looking to the people for their opinions, so it wouldn't hurt to contact super delegates in your area.
__________________
H̓̇̅̉yͤ͏mͬ͂ͧn͑̽̽̌ͪ̑͐͟o̴͊̈́͑̇m͛͌̓ͦ̑aͫ̽ͤ̇n̅̎͐̒ͫ͐c̆ͯͫ̋ ̔̃́eͯ͒rͬͬ̄҉ |
03-09-2016, 11:23 AM | #152 (permalink) | |
David Hasselhoff
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Back in Portland, OR
Posts: 3,681
|
Quote:
Do you have any numbers or examples? I want to agree with you but I need to see some facts, solid measurable stats that bear this out. I see the superdelegate system like a microcosm of the entire political system, rigged and corrupt. Even if Bernie gets through it there's a hideous tangled web of supreme fuckery that's gonna be monumental to clean up. |
|
03-09-2016, 12:40 PM | #153 (permalink) | |||
Brain Licker
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,083
|
Quote:
Alan Grayson: Quote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Three in Vermont, based on public opinion: Quote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------ also, note that Clinton had 3x the superdelegates Obama had in January, too. By March, she had like 1.5x or something, but supedelegates DO change their vote to reflect the public's opinion: Superdelegates Might Not Save Hillary Clinton | FiveThirtyEight http://www.gazettenet.com/News/Local...-district.aspx The exception to this, of course, is that Bernie is an outsider. So that presents a confounding factor, I will concede. But the point is that the supedelegates do not make the Sanders campaign dead in the water and if Sanders is something you want, you CAN still help.
__________________
H̓̇̅̉yͤ͏mͬ͂ͧn͑̽̽̌ͪ̑͐͟o̴͊̈́͑̇m͛͌̓ͦ̑aͫ̽ͤ̇n̅̎͐̒ͫ͐c̆ͯͫ̋ ̔̃́eͯ͒rͬͬ̄҉ Last edited by Xurtio; 03-09-2016 at 01:23 PM. |
|||
03-09-2016, 01:20 PM | #155 (permalink) |
David Hasselhoff
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Back in Portland, OR
Posts: 3,681
|
Thank you, this is a step in the right direction, although IMO getting rid of the superdelegate system altogether would be my personal objective here. BTW, I'm hesitant to seem to be nitpicking a well-constructed post here, but by way of clarification...
was that meant to be "March"? |
03-09-2016, 01:40 PM | #157 (permalink) |
David Hasselhoff
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Back in Portland, OR
Posts: 3,681
|
I recognize that some will criticize me as a Cenk Uygur shill, so be it. I feel this discussion hits the heart of the superdelegate issue
|
03-09-2016, 01:49 PM | #158 (permalink) |
David Hasselhoff
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Back in Portland, OR
Posts: 3,681
|
Here's another one, from the LAST person an MSNBC with their liberal integrity intact
|
03-09-2016, 02:55 PM | #159 (permalink) |
one-balled nipple jockey
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
|
I like what Xurtio is saying as I mentioned above. However, as it appears to me, if this were a marathon, Hillary would only have to run 19 miles before Sanders ran 26, to win. But at the start of the thing, it wasn't only like that, but she also got to wear roller skates. Now, at least, they're both wearing sneakers.
|
03-13-2016, 01:28 AM | #160 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sunnydale Cemetary
Posts: 2,093
|
Tuesday Prediction time! They should have bookies for this stuff.
Hillary seems to have a lockdown on the southern states that views Sanders as too socialist, and both Florida and North Carolina have large black populations that have been heavily favoring Hillary so... Florida: Hillary takes it easily North Carolina: Hillary takes it easily Illinois: Hillary takes it (She is leading in the polls, and I think the somewhat unfair association between Bernie and the supporters invading the Trump rally will hurt him among moderates, who are looking for a stable establishment candidate) Ohio: Sanders takes it (I think there is a strong chance that Sanders can pull off another Michigan here, as the two states are somewhat similar economically. If Sanders can't capture Ohio, or at least one of the big states on Tuesday, than things start to look grim, and I can only imagine the protests at the Trump rallies getting worse once the hard left starts to feel disenfranchised. Missouri: is a weird state in that it seems half North and half South, theoretically it was considered below the Mason Dixon line, and was a slave state that fought for the union. No wonder there so is so much bad $hit going down in St. Louis. I think the states liberals will lean conservative so.. Hillary takes it. I believe the key for Sanders is to play a war of attrition, stick it out and get bloodied long enough in the hopes that the FBI investigation against Hillary starts to get serious. If that happens, the momentum will shift. |
|