The Democratic Primaries - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2016, 06:46 AM   #111 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
Default

Needed to win nomination: 2,383
Hillary Clinton: 502 (includes 451 superdelegates)Bernie Sanders: 70 (includes 19 superdelegates)Not yet allocated: 4,193

I know I sound like a broken record here, but the superdelegates (who do not have any obligation to the voters) will not allow Sanders to win. When you watch the news you may be under the impression that the voters have the power to elect Sanders as the Democratic candidate. They don't. Instead of reporting on this like it's a basketball game they might want to explain how it actually works from time to time.
OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2016, 02:33 PM   #112 (permalink)
Brain Licker
 
Xurtio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,083
Default

the superdelegates are technically not decided yet. They have pledged to Clinton, but they still have a chance to change their vote and many do when the public vote has a clear choice.

Quote:
The silver lining to all this is that the superdelegates’ pledge to Clinton is not finalized, and each one can still change their vote prior to the final vote following the last state primaries. Typically, superdelegates vote in line with the popular vote when the time comes, but there is nothing requiring them to do so.
http://www.snopes.com/2016/02/11/san...uperdelegates/
__________________
H̓̇̅̉yͤ͏mͬ͂ͧn͑̽̽̌ͪ̑͐͟o̴͊̈́͑̇m͛͌̓ͦ̑aͫ̽ͤ̇n̅̎͐̒ͫ͐c̆ͯͫ̋ ̔̃́eͯ͒rͬͬ̄҉
Xurtio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2016, 02:47 PM   #113 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frownland View Post
The thing about a libertarian president is that you're voting someone into office whose platform is essentially not to do anything. Voters want easy answers to complex issues. As far as the pool of candidates, I think that candidates on all sides are dominating social media in the same way that Obama did for both elections, so it might just be that you're more aware of them.
The thing about a libertarian president is that the majority of so-called "libertarians" are really just fiscally conservative republicans who are more concerned with the economy than gay marriage. But they're still socially conservative republicans who could give a **** about the whole "personal liberty" thing that should be the backbone of any real libertarian's political beliefs.

They might not be actively opposed to gay marriage, but they certainly don't particularly support it either, or legalization of marijuana, or any kind of civil rights, or even America's military escapades. They'll vote in anyone who isn't a liberal just like any other republican, and won't shed a single tear when those politicians denounce same-sex marriage.

TL;DR - Most libertarians are ****ing hypocrites and the movement is a joke.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2016, 09:52 PM   #114 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
William_the_Bloody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sunnydale Cemetary
Posts: 2,093
Default

Clinton 3 Sanders 1

Looks like Clinton will have the nomination pretty much wrapped up by Super Tuesday.
William_the_Bloody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2016, 07:36 PM   #115 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
Default

Clinton 594 Delegates 457 Superdelegates

Sanders 405 Delegates 23 Superdelegates

I don't care what source, Snopes, the NYTimes whoever that say the superdelegates will align themselves with the voters. They AREN'T. Just check the numbers.
OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2016, 08:04 PM   #116 (permalink)
Brain Licker
 
Xurtio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk View Post
Clinton 594 Delegates 457 Superdelegates

Sanders 405 Delegates 23 Superdelegates

I don't care what source, Snopes, the NYTimes whoever that say the superdelegates will align themselves with the voters. They AREN'T. Just check the numbers.
They pledged before voters weighed in. They don't get to change their vote until the end of primaries.
__________________
H̓̇̅̉yͤ͏mͬ͂ͧn͑̽̽̌ͪ̑͐͟o̴͊̈́͑̇m͛͌̓ͦ̑aͫ̽ͤ̇n̅̎͐̒ͫ͐c̆ͯͫ̋ ̔̃́eͯ͒rͬͬ̄҉
Xurtio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2016, 09:54 PM   #117 (permalink)
David Hasselhoff
 
Paul Smeenus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Back in Portland, OR
Posts: 3,681
Default

It may well be Trump and Hilary in November. But nothing was decided yesterday, least of all by Hilary.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by grindy View Post
Basically you're David Hasselhoff.
Gentle Giant Catalog Review

The entire Ditty Bops catalog reviewed
Paul Smeenus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2016, 10:37 PM   #118 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xurtio View Post
They pledged before voters weighed in. They don't get to change their vote until the end of primaries.
Then why not count them all including the states that haven't voted?
OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2016, 11:07 PM   #119 (permalink)
Brain Licker
 
Xurtio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,083
Default

What do you mean?
__________________
H̓̇̅̉yͤ͏mͬ͂ͧn͑̽̽̌ͪ̑͐͟o̴͊̈́͑̇m͛͌̓ͦ̑aͫ̽ͤ̇n̅̎͐̒ͫ͐c̆ͯͫ̋ ̔̃́eͯ͒rͬͬ̄҉
Xurtio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2016, 11:46 PM   #120 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,006
Default

If the superdelegates are already pledged even for the states that haven't voted we should already know how many superdelegates they're both getting whether the state has had their primary or not. So where's that data? And since they already pledged before the primaries started I guess O'Malley's still getting whatever his cut is even though he's not even running. So how many is he getting?
OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.