Is there life on Mars? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Are aliens a thing?
Without a doubt. 6 31.58%
I don't know. 5 26.32%
Nope. 2 10.53%
Go home, Lady, you're drunk. 6 31.58%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-21-2015, 12:47 AM   #41 (permalink)
.
 
grindy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: .
Posts: 7,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
You would have to think that considering how much space there is, how many galaxies, how many (maybe) universes (Ki) that the chances of there not being life on at least some of those planets is pretty small. I mean, it may not be what we would understand or recognise as humanoid life, but you'd have to think there'd be life there. As for all these supposed abductees, well, they can't all be wrong, can they?
This film does a great job of showing us just how alien that life, should it exist, might be. Love this.
I hope you're joking.
__________________
A smell of petroleum prevails throughout.
grindy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2015, 01:58 AM   #42 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
William_the_Bloody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sunnydale Cemetary
Posts: 2,093
Default

Is there life on Mars? There is now....well potentially

Mars Curiosity rover may have transported Earth bacteria to Mars
William_the_Bloody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2015, 02:31 PM   #43 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grindy View Post
I hope you're joking.
Why?
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2015, 02:37 PM   #44 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
Why?
You believe in alien abductions?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2015, 02:56 PM   #45 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
Why?
because they can all be wrong.
John Wilkes Booth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2015, 05:18 PM   #46 (permalink)
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

I believe there's lots of life out there and a very rare bit of it will be what we roughly think of as intelligent.

Similar conditions and processes that gave rise to life on earth could happen elsewhere on a multitude of worlds - and likely have. Even extra terrestrial life elsewhere in our own solar system seems like a reasonable possibility to me, for example on Europa. We have vent ecosystems on planet earth that get their energy from heat and chemicals vented from our planet rather than the sun. Similar ecosystems could exist under the surface of otherwise inhospitable worlds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xurtio View Post
We've seen a LOT of planets out there and only one has contained life (Earth).
We haven't seen a lot of planets. We've detected a lot of planets. Generally, they are detected by watching stars. When a planet passes between our telescope and the star we are looking at, there is a change in the luminosity of that star. The bigger the planet, the bigger the change. Hence, this method is best for finding really big planets and not small, rocky, earth-like ones. And when a planet is detected this way, it doesn't mean we've gotten a look at it and could possibly see if it contains trees or cities.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xurtio View Post
Certainly our own existence is proof that its possible, but it's also an improbable event.
Winning the lottery is an improbable event, but there are still plenty of lottery winners. Even if the lottery was a million times harder to win, there would still be winners - even if they'd be a few years apart.

Life elsewhere in the universe has a lot of chances.

Imagine that we are the product of one lineage of life that stretches back all the way to some origin of life (if hard to pinpoint). If that origin hadn't happened or life had completely died out some millions of years later, we wouldn't have been here. But maybe life would have redeveloped in a new lineage or maybe the 30th attempt would have been the successful one. This planet could have animals on it or be inhabited only by unicellular organisms or whatever. It might not be humans, but it would likely be something.

I think a likely problem with intelligent life is that it probably tends to eradicate itself by using up and destroying resources and then crashing. Maybe intelligent civilizations only tend to last a short while.
__________________
Something Completely Different

Last edited by Guybrush; 07-26-2015 at 05:23 PM.
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2015, 05:44 PM   #47 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,992
Default

If you believe in the possibility of extraterrestrial life, then why could they not have visited this planet? I'm not a UFO nut, I don't necessarily believe abductions happen, but I'm not arrogant enough to state they categorically did not. They could have, is what I'm saying. And a lot of the stories abductees tell are remarkably similar. Didn't any of you watch The X-Files?

Is it more stupid to believe in the possibility of life on other worlds (which then allows they may have visited ours) than to put your faith in a concept with no empirical evidence to back it up at all, to believe in a god? I'm not saying there's anything wrong with believing in God or a god, but it's just as much a leap of faith as allowing the chance that some --- probably not all, or even that many, but some --- of these abductees may in fact be recalling actual experiences. I don't know for sure they did, but by the same token you don't know for sure that they didn't, so you have to be open to the possibility.

"You know what, Vort The Invincible? Sometimes I look up at the sky and I wonder ... could there be other intelligent life out there?"
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2015, 06:04 PM   #48 (permalink)
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

I believe in life on other planets, but I don't think we've been visited by representatives of other intelligent civilizations. The greatest barriers are space and time and these barriers are generally enormous. Aliens would probably have to cross oceans of time and space to travel from their planet of origin to ours and I just generally believe that it's too big an obstacle. Even if it's not impossible, it is likely to be impractical and so if there are civilizations that colonize space, it doesn't necessarily mean they would travel very far in cosmological terms. If it takes you 50 000 years to get to one planet and 500 years to get to another, the choice seems simple. Still, colonizing space would make a civilization more resistant to dying out and they could radiate out over time, but still ..

There's also a lack of evidence that we've ever been visited. I imagine the only real point of visiting our planet would be because it holds some resource they could use, even if it was just something simple like decent gravity, water and a good temperature. When we look to other planets, we think of whether it's a place we could colonize or perhaps harvest something from .. I assume intelligent aliens would have the same practical sensibilities.

If intelligent aliens had visited earth in the past, for example when the dinosaurs were around, I would think they'd build a colony - perhaps bring some alien organisms for agriculture or whatever. There'd be some indication they were here, like a very different lineage of organisms that suddenly seemed to appear in evolutionary history or perhaps even ruins of an ancient civilization.
__________________
Something Completely Different
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2015, 07:36 PM   #49 (permalink)
Brain Licker
 
Xurtio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tore View Post
I believe there's lots of life out there and a very rare bit of it will be what we roughly think of as intelligent.

Similar conditions and processes that gave rise to life on earth could happen elsewhere on a multitude of worlds - and likely have. Even extra terrestrial life elsewhere in our own solar system seems like a reasonable possibility to me, for example on Europa. We have vent ecosystems on planet earth that get their energy from heat and chemicals vented from our planet rather than the sun. Similar ecosystems could exist under the surface of otherwise inhospitable worlds.



We haven't seen a lot of planets. We've detected a lot of planets. Generally, they are detected by watching stars. When a planet passes between our telescope and the star we are looking at, there is a change in the luminosity of that star. The bigger the planet, the bigger the change. Hence, this method is best for finding really big planets and not small, rocky, earth-like ones. And when a planet is detected this way, it doesn't mean we've gotten a look at it and could possibly see if it contains trees or cities.



Winning the lottery is an improbable event, but there are still plenty of lottery winners. Even if the lottery was a million times harder to win, there would still be winners - even if they'd be a few years apart.

Life elsewhere in the universe has a lot of chances.

Imagine that we are the product of one lineage of life that stretches back all the way to some origin of life (if hard to pinpoint). If that origin hadn't happened or life had completely died out some millions of years later, we wouldn't have been here. But maybe life would have redeveloped in a new lineage or maybe the 30th attempt would have been the successful one. This planet could have animals on it or be inhabited only by unicellular organisms or whatever. It might not be humans, but it would likely be something.

I think a likely problem with intelligent life is that it probably tends to eradicate itself by using up and destroying resources and then crashing. Maybe intelligent civilizations only tend to last a short while.
Since the 1980's, the way planets are detected is through doppler spectroscopy. High-dispersion spectroscopy is what they are starting to use to detect whether planets have a chemical composition complex enough to support life or not.

Either way, I won't get my hopes up until there's solid evidence.
__________________
H̓̇̅̉yͤ͏mͬ͂ͧn͑̽̽̌ͪ̑͐͟o̴͊̈́͑̇m͛͌̓ͦ̑aͫ̽ͤ̇n̅̎͐̒ͫ͐c̆ͯͫ̋ ̔̃́eͯ͒rͬͬ̄҉
Xurtio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2015, 02:10 AM   #50 (permalink)
Juicious Maximus III
 
Guybrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scabb Island
Posts: 6,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xurtio View Post
Since the 1980's, the way planets are detected is through doppler spectroscopy. High-dispersion spectroscopy is what they are starting to use to detect whether planets have a chemical composition complex enough to support life or not.

Either way, I won't get my hopes up until there's solid evidence.
This is basically what I mentioned, but knowing a planet's chemical composition generally does not tell us if there's life on it. And also as I mentioned, the greater the mass of a planet, the easier it is to detect this way and so as a method, it favours detection of big planets which tend to be inhospitable gas giants.
__________________
Something Completely Different
Guybrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.