Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth (Post 1619683)

hey frownland.. you realize nothing that you just said has anything to do with the strawman fallacy, right?

you basically just disagreed with batlord's theory on the correlation between lil's sexual drive and her alcoholic intake (which read like sort of a joke to me), and then carelessly labelled it a strawman, rather than just saying nah you're wrong.

thus making you guilty of creating an actual strawman argument (setting up a false argument for the purpose of being defeated and applying it to your opponent).

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1619689)

Because it's a common situation and I'm secretly racist are the two biggest reasons.



So where in my post did I say that lil is never horny when she's sober?

Originally Posted by Mr. Charlie (Post 1619696)

I thought I was.

Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth (Post 1619697)

where in batlord's post did he attribute this 'argument' to you?

he was using your post as a platform to expound with his own ideas and take a couple side jabs at lil.

you will not defeat me, frownland. i learned how to logic in public school.

Originally Posted by RoxyRollah (Post 1619698)

Reply hazy.

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1619704)

I realize his intent behind using a strawman but the fallacy is still present.