Music Banter - PC issue of the day pt 2: objectum sexuality

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)

- Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/)

- - PC issue of the day pt 2: objectum sexuality (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/82586-pc-issue-day-pt-2-objectum-sexuality.html)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oriphiel (Post 1607053)

I'm guessing that we need to ask these questions and establish legal precedents on the topic of sex/marriage with objects so that society can jump through as few hoops as possible once sex bots are invented.

http://www.technovelgy.com/graphics/...r-universe.gif

We're all waiting...

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls (Post 1607141)

:banghead: There are multiple comments about this right before your post. Do you even read our nonsense before you respond to it?

No. I mean, I can do your recs three at a time in "Love or Hate?" or I can read six pages of a joke thread, but I cannot do both. Well I can, but I don't want to.

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth (Post 1607335)

^that's a self defeating argument, because the only reason 'consent' is considered an issue regarding human relations is because humans have autonomy and so without consent you can do something to a human against their will

if your argument is that objects have no autonomy and thus can't consent, then it's a non-issue because consent is only a priority for entities that have a will for you to violate. no autonomy = no consent, no problemo

further, part of the condition/orientation known as objectum sexuality is that people who have this orientation believe they do experience feedback given to them from their objects. the lady in question had the bow grow cold to her and break her heart. so in the realm of objectum sexuals, objects, can and do consent to the relationship, though how and whether they do so is only known to the objectum sexual them self.

so you can cast your aspersions to the credibility of the experiences of these individuals, but as best psychologists can tell they are genuine and born with this orientation, so in doing so you are basically just picking on the little guy, kicking the cripple when he's down, objectum-bashing, etc. which is pretty reprehensible for people who consider themselves open minded and progressive towards alternative lifestyles.

so try harder, bigots

When you say bow, are we talking longbow, crossbow, bow you tie presents up with, bow girls wear in their hair, what? Cos if it's a crossbow then that's just sick man!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1607779)

When you say bow, are we talking longbow, crossbow, bow you tie presents up with, bow girls wear in their hair, what? Cos if it's a crossbow then that's just sick man!

Could you bold the word you're making a dad joke about in JWB's post? Cause that's a lot of words to read just to figure out the context of your joke.

Right.So I never thought I would need to post in this thread.

The 36 inch balloon fetishist.:confused: I just don't even know.

Let me paint you a picture.
My Sunday employee, Lemont, (aka.Sam ) goes to fetch us lunch, means I gotta watch the registers for him right. Ring,ring riiiiiiing.

Me:"Thank you for calling _____ ___, where nobody has more party for less this Jess how can I help you?"

36incher: " Yes mam, Im trying to plan this party for my girlfriend and I have all the presents,streamers etc and I need help with some balloons specifically the 36 inch ones and do you carry those?"

ME: Yes sir I carry them and......"
Cuts me off here

36incher: "OK greeeat and what color are they?"

Me: "I only carry pink ones at this time si......."

36incher"mmmm..pink. And the strings are they looong?"

Me: "Well sir they can be floor high or ....."

36incher:"Yes but are they loooong, and are these ballloons hard to pop, you know cause they need to be HARD."

At this point I've got his# and I just let him keep going all while not busting a gut laughing.Alright I think I got sumthin fer you.

Me: Well sir they are H-A-R-D .....to pop yes you and your balloons should be VERY PLEASED when you get home together."

36incher:"oh great, ok and a couple more things, how does the latext feel on your skin? Does it feel lile you are just in a balloon wonderland?"

Me in a very low suggestive tone: "yes I love the way they feel and I LOVE to frolic in them s'why I work here."

Click.

I don't evevun know. I just don't know.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1607876)

Could you bold the word you're making a dad joke about in JWB's post? Cause that's a lot of words to read just to figure out the context of your joke.

What? You can't even read past four words?? I said, "When you say bow", what more do you need me to do? Hold your hand??

He was asking where you found the word bow in jwb's post because it's too long winded and boring for Batlord to read all the way through.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1608239)

He was asking where you found the word bow in jwb's post because it's too long winded and boring for Batlord to read all the way through.

(Sigh) Okay then...

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth (Post 1607335)

^that's a self defeating argument, because the only reason 'consent' is considered an issue regarding human relations is because humans have autonomy and so without consent you can do something to a human against their will

if your argument is that objects have no autonomy and thus can't consent, then it's a non-issue because consent is only a priority for entities that have a will for you to violate. no autonomy = no consent, no problemo

further, part of the condition/orientation known as objectum sexuality is that people who have this orientation believe they do experience feedback given to them from their objects. the lady in question had the bow grow cold to her and break her heart. so in the realm of objectum sexuals, objects, can and do consent to the relationship, though how and whether they do so is only known to the objectum sexual them self.

so you can cast your aspersions to the credibility of the experiences of these individuals, but as best psychologists can tell they are genuine and born with this orientation, so in doing so you are basically just picking on the little guy, kicking the cripple when he's down, objectum-bashing, etc. which is pretty reprehensible for people who consider themselves open minded and progressive towards alternative lifestyles.

so try harder, bigots

Happy Batty?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1608318)

(Sigh) Okay then...

Happy Batty?

Why would I be happy? How did that benefit me?

it was a longbow ftr

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth (Post 1608366)

it was a longbow ftr

Thank god for that. Thought she was a real freak there for a moment!