PC issue of the day pt 2: objectum sexuality

~~John Wilkes Booth~~ · 06-27-2015, 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chula Vista

@absurdthreadoftheyear

I'm going to go **** my toothbrush now. I'll clean it when I'm finished.

right... well according to scientific experts, it's a real orientation. so what makes you so quick to judge these people, chula? you sound like a bigot to me

Trollheart · 06-27-2015, 06:42 AM

I think we're avoiding the elephant in the room (NO DON'T!) --- if the tower, bridge, Vokswagen or other inanimate object did not consent to the liaison was it then Object Rape?

Surely a more important question?

Oriphiel · 06-27-2015, 07:35 AM

I'm guessing that we need to ask these questions and establish legal precedents on the topic of sex/marriage with objects so that society can jump through as few hoops as possible once sex bots are invented.

The Batlord · 06-27-2015, 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oriphiel

I'm guessing that we need to ask these questions and establish legal precedents on the topic of sex/marriage with objects so that society can jump through as few hoops as possible once sex bots are invented.

Why would I need to marry my sexbot? Permanent sidepiece is perfectly alright with me.

DwnWthVwls · 06-27-2015, 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart

I think we're avoiding the elephant in the room (NO DON'T!) --- if the tower, bridge, Vokswagen or other inanimate object did not consent to the liaison was it then Object Rape?

Surely a more important question?

There are multiple comments about this right before your post. Do you even read our nonsense before you respond to it?

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls

I think it's bullshit people can do this tbh. Objects can't consent.

Quote:

Originally Posted by grindy

#objectumsexualityisrape

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord

I think that officially puts women over the top as far as sexual assault goes.

#freethedildos

~~John Wilkes Booth~~ · 06-27-2015, 08:22 PM

^that's a self defeating argument, because the only reason 'consent' is considered an issue regarding human relations is because humans have autonomy and so without consent you can do something to a human against their will

if your argument is that objects have no autonomy and thus can't consent, then it's a non-issue because consent is only a priority for entities that have a will for you to violate. no autonomy = no consent, no problemo

further, part of the condition/orientation known as objectum sexuality is that people who have this orientation believe they do experience feedback given to them from their objects. the lady in question had the bow grow cold to her and break her heart. so in the realm of objectum sexuals, objects, can and do consent to the relationship, though how and whether they do so is only known to the objectum sexual them self.

so you can cast your aspersions to the credibility of the experiences of these individuals, but as best psychologists can tell they are genuine and born with this orientation, so in doing so you are basically just picking on the little guy, kicking the cripple when he's down, objectum-bashing, etc. which is pretty reprehensible for people who consider themselves open minded and progressive towards alternative lifestyles.

so try harder, bigots

grtwhtgrvty · 06-27-2015, 11:38 PM

Yeah... the object can't consent to something against its will because it has no will.

The Batlord · 06-27-2015, 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty

Yeah... the object can't consent to something against its will because it has no will.

Does that mean I can marry a brain dead person?

DwnWthVwls · 06-27-2015, 11:55 PM

This also makes bangin corpses okay. Lil is on her way to Teddy's grave as we speak.

The Batlord · 06-27-2015, 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls

This also makes bangin corpses okay. Lil is on her way to Teddy's grave as we speak.

With a cart, so she can go have an orgy with Ted, Marc Bolan, and Jim Morrison. It sounds like her dream TBH. Can't get pregnant by a corpse. Can you?

06-27-2015, 06:42 AM	#32 (permalink)
Trollheart Born to be mild Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: 404 Not Found Posts: 26,992	I think we're avoiding the elephant in the room (NO DON'T!) --- if the tower, bridge, Vokswagen or other inanimate object did not consent to the liaison was it then Object Rape? Surely a more important question? __________________ Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018

06-27-2015, 08:22 PM	#36 (permalink)
~~John Wilkes Booth~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 2,235	^that's a self defeating argument, because the only reason 'consent' is considered an issue regarding human relations is because humans have autonomy and so without consent you can do something to a human against their will if your argument is that objects have no autonomy and thus can't consent, then it's a non-issue because consent is only a priority for entities that have a will for you to violate. no autonomy = no consent, no problemo further, part of the condition/orientation known as objectum sexuality is that people who have this orientation believe they do experience feedback given to them from their objects. the lady in question had the bow grow cold to her and break her heart. so in the realm of objectum sexuals, objects, can and do consent to the relationship, though how and whether they do so is only known to the objectum sexual them self. so you can cast your aspersions to the credibility of the experiences of these individuals, but as best psychologists can tell they are genuine and born with this orientation, so in doing so you are basically just picking on the little guy, kicking the cripple when he's down, objectum-bashing, etc. which is pretty reprehensible for people who consider themselves open minded and progressive towards alternative lifestyles. so try harder, bigots Last edited by John Wilkes Booth; 06-27-2015 at 08:29 PM.

06-27-2015, 07:35 AM	#33 (permalink)
Oriphiel Ask me how! Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: The States Posts: 5,354	I'm guessing that we need to ask these questions and establish legal precedents on the topic of sex/marriage with objects so that society can jump through as few hoops as possible once sex bots are invented.

06-27-2015, 11:38 PM	#37 (permalink)
grtwhtgrvty jiojoijoi Join Date: Feb 2015 Posts: 398	Yeah... the object can't consent to something against its will because it has no will.