donald trump 4 prez - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: can he do it?
yes 23 52.27%
yea 21 47.73%
Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-13-2016, 01:57 AM   #1 (permalink)
A.B.N.
 
djchameleon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 12,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goofle View Post
I've stated several times that Trump is a ridiculous candidate. The fact that he and Hillary are in the running is a farce. But I like Trump more than her and he would strike less fear in me if I were an American.
Well good thing you aren't an American. Why exactly does he strike less fear in you? I don't want to just automatically assume it's because you are white and xenophobic but I guess it kind of fits. Especially with you voting to leave for Brexit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ki View Post
So, you won't give a third party the chance to do well, you'll wait until they've done well enough to vote for them. And instead of helping that cause, you'll instead throw your vote towards someone who is corrupt and you know is a bad vote. Yeah, that makes way more sense than trying to change the game when both candidates are ****.
You have to be realistic and the reality of the situation is this. If more people decide that they want to stick to their principles and vote for a third party. It will end up just splitting the vote. This could be a way for Trump to win and I'm not sure why his team isn't like doing some underhanded stuff to push more third party candidates to the forefront. If people are stupid enough to vote for a third party instead of the necessary evil then it splits the votes that Hillary would get and Trump would end up winning with his little bit of votes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ki View Post
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but Hillary isn't exactly getting good air time either. People are voting for Trump to not vote for Hillary, and the people not voting for Hillary just aren't putting votes in. So, Trump has more legitimate supporters on his side, while Hillary just has the votes of those that don't want Trump in office. I, myself am refusing to vote until I see a legitimate third party candidate, and if there isn't one, I won't be voting for either. I can't conscientiously vote for either sides at the current moment.
Legitimate or not, in swing states where votes actually matter. A vote is a vote, so what if it's an anti-vote/lesser of two evils vote. Have you looked at the current third party candidates? Can you name them? Maybe you should do the research and look into them yourself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre View Post
Don't underestimate the stupidity of the average American. Dumb asses on both sides, but Trump is gaining the most dumb asses because he knows how to appeal to dumbasses. Before you know it we'll be watering our crops with Gatorade.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre View Post
Trump is going to win.

Anybody notice that the 'Republicans' that support Trump are actually more Liberal and how they are now starting to slander the Liberals by saying they are going to take our guns? People are retarded. America is a pathetic country of under educated simpletons and that's why Trump is doing well because he is the face of America.
Woo hooo more America bashing. So edgy and original.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre View Post
One thing I learned is that you can't trust polls. Especially if they are from Fox News. Because Fox News polls are based on the opinions of people that watch Fox News, not the opinions of our country as a whole.
Yeah, that's true you can't trust polls but even Trump himself is losing faith that he can win the election. He's relying on polls and even made a comment recently about how with him losing in two key states. He knows he has lost the election. Remember this isn't really a popular vote kind of thing. You just have to rely on the electoral college to toss in their votes for each state. So the whole thing about idiots voting blah blah blah. Doesn't even ****ing matter. He's not going to win.
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RoxyRollah View Post
IMO I don't know jack-**** though so don't listen to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle View Post
The problem is that most police officers in America are psychopaths.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
You're a terrible dictionary.
djchameleon is offline  
Old 08-13-2016, 11:16 AM   #2 (permalink)
Key
.
 
Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djchameleon View Post
You have to be realistic and the reality of the situation is this. If more people decide that they want to stick to their principles and vote for a third party. It will end up just splitting the vote. This could be a way for Trump to win and I'm not sure why his team isn't like doing some underhanded stuff to push more third party candidates to the forefront. If people are stupid enough to vote for a third party instead of the necessary evil then it splits the votes that Hillary would get and Trump would end up winning with his little bit of votes.
You're telling me to be realistic, but then you're telling me not to stick to my guns when it comes to conscientiously choosing who I vote for. Realistically, we're all ****ed either way, but I'm not going to bend over backwards and let it happen if I have the choice to be a part of a change. The people who are voting for one of two evils are just too lazy or ignorant to try to change the rules. This election isn't like an election that we've seen in the past where one person was the obvious choice. Both choices we have here are both terrible choices, so why not try to go for someone that is worth putting my vote for, i.e. Gary Johnson. And don't give me the "he's not part of your beliefs" bull****. I've looked into him, and I'll be damned if I don't vote on him especially with the credentials he has under his belt. Again, I stress that I'm not going to just bend over and take it in the ass by voting for Hillary or Trump, I'm at least going to try to accomplish something with my vote.
Key is offline  
Old 08-13-2016, 11:49 AM   #3 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ki View Post
The people who are voting for one of two evils are just too lazy or ignorant to try to change the rules.
Don't be so naive. How many presidential elections have you paid really close attention to to understand how third party candidates fare on election day? This is my tenth.

The only two real viable third party candidates have been Ross Perot and Ralph Nadar. In 1992 Perot actually got about 18% of the general election vote but not a single electoral vote. And Nadar pretty much gave Bush the win in 2000. Bush beat Gore by only 537 votes in Florida. Nadar got over 19,000 votes there. The vast majority of his voters said they'd have voted for Gore if Nadar hadn't run.

So ya, either throw away your vote or tilt the odds a bit more in Trumps favor.
__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline  
Old 08-13-2016, 11:55 AM   #4 (permalink)
Key
.
 
Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista View Post

So ya, either throw away your vote or tilt the odds a bit more in Trumps favor.
You're saying that like it wouldn't the same outcome if Hillary was in office. Again, we're ****ed either way.
Key is offline  
Old 08-13-2016, 12:00 PM   #5 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ki View Post
Again, we're ****ed either way.
You keep saying that but still haven't backed it up with any substance. Clinton has tons of political experience. Trump has none. Clinton spent 4 years traveling the globe visiting foreign leaders. Trump? He owns a lot of golf courses. Clinton's had an office in the West Wing and sat in the situation room during multiple wars. Trump's bankrupted multiple businesses.

How can you look at them both as being equal?
__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline  
Old 08-13-2016, 12:03 PM   #6 (permalink)
Jacob Sartorius
 
Blank.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Dank memes
Posts: 4,033
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista View Post
You keep saying that but still haven't backed it up with any substance. Clinton has tons of political experience. Trump has none. Clinton spent 4 years traveling the globe visiting foreign leaders. Trump? He owns a lot of golf courses. Clinton's had an office in the West Wing and sat in the situation room during multiple wars. Trump's bankrupted multiple businesses.

How can you look at them both as being equal?
If you seriously think trump wasn't traveling the globe meeting other leaders of industry then you have no idea what you're talking about.
Blank. is offline  
Old 08-13-2016, 12:03 PM   #7 (permalink)
Key
.
 
Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista View Post
You keep saying that but still haven't backed it up with any substance. Clinton has tons of political experience. Trump has none. Clinton spent 4 years traveling the globe visiting foreign leaders. Trump? He owns a lot of golf courses. Clinton's had an office in the West Wing and sat in the situation room during multiple wars. Trump's bankrupted multiple businesses.

How can you look at them both as being equal?
There's been plenty said in the thread regarding Clinton's inability to be in office, so i'd be repeating what other people have said. Her past experiences don't mean anything if she's not fit to run in office. Trump is the same way, he can't run in office based on his past experiences.
Key is offline  
Old 08-13-2016, 12:07 PM   #8 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default

Another cop out Ki?
__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline  
Old 08-13-2016, 03:25 PM   #9 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista View Post
Don't be so naive. How many presidential elections have you paid really close attention to to understand how third party candidates fare on election day? This is my tenth.

The only two real viable third party candidates have been Ross Perot and Ralph Nadar. In 1992 Perot actually got about 18% of the general election vote but not a single electoral vote. And Nadar pretty much gave Bush the win in 2000. Bush beat Gore by only 537 votes in Florida. Nadar got over 19,000 votes there. The vast majority of his voters said they'd have voted for Gore if Nadar hadn't run.

So ya, either throw away your vote or tilt the odds a bit more in Trumps favor.
Why keep propping up a system that doesn't work? What are you gaining in the long term? You want better things for you and your kids? What about your grandkids? Or your great grandkids? Cause they're going to have to live in the declining America you're creating with your lesser of two evils.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline  
Old 08-13-2016, 04:04 PM   #10 (permalink)
A.B.N.
 
djchameleon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: NY baby
Posts: 12,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ki View Post
You're telling me to be realistic, but then you're telling me not to stick to my guns when it comes to conscientiously choosing who I vote for. Realistically, we're all ****ed either way, but I'm not going to bend over backwards and let it happen if I have the choice to be a part of a change. The people who are voting for one of two evils are just too lazy or ignorant to try to change the rules. This election isn't like an election that we've seen in the past where one person was the obvious choice. Both choices we have here are both terrible choices, so why not try to go for someone that is worth putting my vote for, i.e. Gary Johnson. And don't give me the "he's not part of your beliefs" bull****. I've looked into him, and I'll be damned if I don't vote on him especially with the credentials he has under his belt. Again, I stress that I'm not going to just bend over and take it in the ass by voting for Hillary or Trump, I'm at least going to try to accomplish something with my vote.
Oh okay that's good that you know about the third party candidates. I wasn't going to say anything about he's not part of your beliefs. I don't even know where you got that from. It's good that you have educated yourself on him. I was thinking about voting for Jill Stein but I heard she was an anti Vaxxer and I was like hell nope. I can't support her. I need to look into it though because there is evidence saying that she isn't an anti Vaxxer and someone took her out of context. Non of this even matters though, especially if you don't live in a swing state. Your state is already spoken for and Hillary already has it on lock but if it makes you feel better go ahead and vote for Gary.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blankmind View Post
If you seriously think trump wasn't traveling the globe meeting other leaders of industry then you have no idea what you're talking about.
Yeah, Trump was in the UK immediately after Brexit passed well for two reasons, he has some sort of golf course he's building there and to show support for all the xenophobes in another country.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goofle View Post
I hang out with Asians because I wanna keep check on them. The boot works better in close proximity.
This joke is over my head. You are going to have to explain or not. Up to you.
__________________
Fame, fortune, power, titties. People say these are the most crucial things in life, but you can have a pocket full o' gold and it doesn't mean sh*t if you don't have someone to share that gold with. Seems simple. Yet it's an important lesson to learn. Even lone wolves run in packs sometimes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RoxyRollah View Post
IMO I don't know jack-**** though so don't listen to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle View Post
The problem is that most police officers in America are psychopaths.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
You're a terrible dictionary.
djchameleon is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.