guns - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-13-2015, 07:41 PM   #51 (permalink)
Brain Licker
 
Xurtio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,083
Default

Paranoia? Try laziness :p
__________________
H̓̇̅̉yͤ͏mͬ͂ͧn͑̽̽̌ͪ̑͐͟o̴͊̈́͑̇m͛͌̓ͦ̑aͫ̽ͤ̇n̅̎͐̒ͫ͐c̆ͯͫ̋ ̔̃́eͯ͒rͬͬ̄҉
Xurtio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2015, 07:42 PM   #52 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fiddler View Post
They are modern (in the sense that they were made in this century) fire arms using old school technology. Meaning you have to pour the black powder, pack the ball/powder, prime, and aim. But these modern versions are a lot more accurate than their counter parts. I'm asking your thoughts on these particular off set weapons.
uhh, yea i'd say maybe have a another, much less stringent registry for them to make it easier for historical places etc... and then if they actually manifested as a real problem then you'd probably start addressing them and and add them to the main registry as well. dunno to me it doesn't seem like a major concern.

they strait up banned guns in several countries like uk and ****... you don't see musket drive bys going down over there too much do you?
John Wilkes Booth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2015, 07:48 PM   #53 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista View Post
But how do get anyone who owns an unregistered gun to register it? The paranoia with most of the folks who own those guns runs really high.

Can we agree that universal background checks as part of the gun buying process is a pretty sound and reasonable thing? After the Newtown School massacre this came up for debate once again.

Well, it was quickly shot down, again, because of the NRA and the fear instilled in the Pro Gun groups about how that would be "giving an inch".
the incentive to get registered mostly comes from the fact that having an unregistered firearm would be a crime, and if caught with one you'd be charged.

obviously there are tons of guns out there that we will have to deal with regardless. i'm not saying this system fixes all gun problems

but it aims to stop the flow of new illegal weapons from the legal market. which i would consider a pretty big improvement.

edit - yea i'm fine with background checks... but iirc the newton kid used his mothers guns to go on that rampage. really this system isn't designed to address the mass shooting phenomenon. cause i really don't think there is a way to stop people like that from going off randomly. or at least not that i can think of... feel free if anyone else has any ideas about that.

the registry/database/accountability system thing i'm talking about is aimed more at limiting the potential of the criminal underworld to arm themselves. i mean look at what's happening in chicago.

Last edited by John Wilkes Booth; 06-13-2015 at 07:59 PM.
John Wilkes Booth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2015, 08:35 PM   #54 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth View Post
edit - yea i'm fine with background checks... but iirc the newton kid used his mothers guns to go on that rampage. really this system isn't designed to address the mass shooting phenomenon.
Point being that even in the immediate wake of that horrendous event the country couldn't collectively get behind perfectly common sense gun legislation. I remember how the numbers went in the weeks following. Immediately after a large percentage were for universal checks and the politicians jumped on board. Then with each passing week the numbers quickly plummeted and the politos quickly started backing away.
__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2015, 09:51 PM   #55 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista View Post
Point being that even in the immediate wake of that horrendous event the country couldn't collectively get behind perfectly common sense gun legislation. I remember how the numbers went in the weeks following. Immediately after a large percentage were for universal checks and the politicians jumped on board. Then with each passing week the numbers quickly plummeted and the politos quickly started backing away.
You're taking something that directly affected about twenty people in a nation of 300 million, and saying we should enact national policy because of it. I'm all for universal checks and all that good business, but I don't base my stance on gun control around isolated incidents.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2015, 10:19 PM   #56 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
You're taking something that directly affected about twenty people in a nation of 300 million, and saying we should enact national policy because of it. I'm all for universal checks and all that good business, but I don't base my stance on gun control around isolated incidents.
Nah, that affected a hell of a lot of people to varying degrees. Pretty much every parent of a young child was a bit messed up over that. Hell, f*cked me up for a while afterwards. Mainly wondering how the kid was able to get so screwed up unchecked to the point of snapping like that.

But I get what you're saying.

Point being movements will try to gain ground based on flash point incidents. And it's worked quite a few times in the past.
__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2015, 10:52 PM   #57 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

to me it's a bit sad/shameful how we rally around these flash points

meanwhile 11,000 people are murdered a every year with guns in the US

the vast majority of whom are killed in ordinary domestic disputes/gangland murders

that's the one thing soulflower & co have got right imo... to the media, black lives don't matter

unless a particular black murder can be used to stir up racial tensions, cause that brings in big ratings
John Wilkes Booth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2015, 02:06 AM   #58 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
fiddler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 242
Default

JWB: the interesting part is that just about everything you're proposing is already in place to some extent. For instance possessing an unregistered firearm is a crime, and it's a parole violation. A background check is ran on everyone attempting to purchase a firearm. In NC it's a two day wait period.

The truth is that fanatics like the NRA steams from your second amendment right to "A well armed militia necessary for the security of the free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." They take the bear arms part and forget the militia part. I think that the two are dependent on one another, otherwise they would have made it a separate amendment or so. In these modern times, do we really need a militia? Apparently so according to the people in Michigan think so as they maintain a militia.
__________________
Every being is intelligent. But if you measure a fish's intelligence on it's ability to climb a tree, it will live forever thinking it's stupid.
fiddler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2015, 02:13 AM   #59 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fiddler View Post
JWB: the interesting part is that just about everything you're proposing is already in place to some extent. For instance possessing an unregistered firearm is a crime, and it's a parole violation. A background check is ran on everyone attempting to purchase a firearm. In NC it's a two day wait period.

The truth is that fanatics like the NRA steams from your second amendment right to "A well armed militia necessary for the security of the free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." They take the bear arms part and forget the militia part. I think that the two are dependent on one another, otherwise they would have made it a separate amendment or so. In these modern times, do we really need a militia? Apparently so according to the people in Michigan think so as they maintain a militia.
Maybe they're right...

More black bears sighted in Michigan's populated areas | MLive.com
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2015, 02:14 AM   #60 (permalink)
.
 
grindy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: .
Posts: 7,201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth View Post
the incentive to get registered mostly comes from the fact that having an unregistered firearm would be a crime, and if caught with one you'd be charged.

obviously there are tons of guns out there that we will have to deal with regardless. i'm not saying this system fixes all gun problems

but it aims to stop the flow of new illegal weapons from the legal market. which i would consider a pretty big improvement.

edit - yea i'm fine with background checks... but iirc the newton kid used his mothers guns to go on that rampage. really this system isn't designed to address the mass shooting phenomenon. cause i really don't think there is a way to stop people like that from going off randomly. or at least not that i can think of... feel free if anyone else has any ideas about that.

the registry/database/accountability system thing i'm talking about is aimed more at limiting the potential of the criminal underworld to arm themselves. i mean look at what's happening in chicago.
In Germany there's a law that says guns have to be kept in a safe at all times, and it has to be a serious safe, nothing you can open with just a little key. There was a school shooting a few years ago, where it turned out that the perpetrator's father didn't secure the guns as well as he should have and if I remember correctly he got sued the **** out of him.
__________________
A smell of petroleum prevails throughout.
grindy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.