|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-12-2015, 12:49 PM | #11 (permalink) | ||||
Toasted Poster
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It is.
__________________
“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.” |
||||
06-12-2015, 06:55 PM | #12 (permalink) | ||||
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
|
what about maintaining proof of possession of that gun periodically... the way i said?
and if that's what they do as well then where's the security weak point in this system which allows legally purchased guns to nonetheless be leaked onto the black market. or does that not happen in california? Quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballistic_fingerprinting Quote:
i'm aware of the limited political potential for such a program to actually be adopted. but what i'm more interested in discussing whether such an idea, if implemented in the way i've explained, would work to address the problem of illegal arms and to what extent. and if not, then i'd like it if people would give some reasoning and explain how they would circumvent the system, and then maybe i could try to think of ways to stop them from circumventing it, etc basically i'm more concerned with the logistical issues than with the campaign to sway public opinion.. tbh i'd be fine with a more autocratic state that just implemented such a system without vying for public consent... but that's a different topic for the last 3 democracy threads that nobody ever seems interested in responding to Quote:
Quote:
i bet this is even more fun though |
||||
06-12-2015, 07:09 PM | #13 (permalink) | ||
Zum Henker Defätist!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
06-12-2015, 07:16 PM | #14 (permalink) |
Fck Ths Thngs
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,261
|
I agree which is why I don't protest guns or anything. If people want them then whatever, I just think they cause more harm then good, and most people shouldn't have them. I still recognize their right to do things I don't like, and I don't ever complain about it. Similar to how I think most people shouldn't have pets or kids.
Also, I don't think they help unless unnecessary death is a good thing. Someone's life is worth more than your possessions, sorry. |
06-12-2015, 07:18 PM | #15 (permalink) | ||||
Toasted Poster
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In CA we can only use 10 round mags. Really cool to quickly blow off a large number of shots and it's really quick to swap out mags. Barrel guns hold either 5 or 6 rounds and are a bit of a pain to reload relatively speaking. Get a glock and one of these:
__________________
“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.” |
||||
06-12-2015, 07:18 PM | #16 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 242
|
I own several fire arms and I would personally rather teach my kid firearm responsibility rather then "No! Those are bad!". I go hunting with a .50 caliber black powder. Do you REALLY think that is used for protection? Naw. And I will tell you for sure, if you break into my house, I will point a gun at you and threaten to shoot you. But that's how I am and how I was raised and the culture I was raised in. Btw, JWB, there's already a database.
__________________
Every being is intelligent. But if you measure a fish's intelligence on it's ability to climb a tree, it will live forever thinking it's stupid. |
06-12-2015, 07:37 PM | #17 (permalink) | |||
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
|
Quote:
let's say hypothetically the NRA has no choice and this is an autocratic sort of set up Quote:
can you expand on 'logistics'? cause when i say logistics i'm referring to whether it would be something that is sorta physically possible... rather than whether or not our current political process would allow for it, which i'm fine with conceding that it wouldn't. Quote:
|
|||
06-12-2015, 08:10 PM | #19 (permalink) |
Toasted Poster
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
|
Having a gun discussion without including the NRA and politics is pretty pointless IMO.
And semi-auto guns can be cool as hell too. Sig P226
__________________
“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.” |
06-12-2015, 08:34 PM | #20 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
|
i don't think it's pointless... really i've heard people bitch about the NRA and **** time and time again... it's not like i dismiss whatever grievances you have with them, but i just can't maintain interest in people complaining about political opposition again and again and again. to me there's really not much potential to say anything there that hasn't been said a thousand times before.
but a lot of those NRA people challenge the actual potential efficacy of any gun control program.. which is what i'm more interested in. so saying 'it doesn't have political support' is actually what's pointless to me. cause i feel that it's up in the air as to whether there is actually an effective strategy to control guns... which is what we really should figure out before we get into arguing about whether or not we should implement said strategy. |
|