The Refugee crisis

Lilja · 11-10-2015, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth

these people are mainly sunni muslims - why don't the sunni majority countries that are in close proximity to syria take these refugees? you know... societies which come much closer to resembling their culture and which they would have a much easier time assimilating into? why not turkey, saudi arabia, egypt, etc...? why sweden, germany, england, etc...?

the answer is simple. the world knows that western countries are just one big charity at this point. the leaders of saudi arabia and turkey are simply too smart and their stakes are too high for them to make that same mistake.

You do realise that turkey has taken in the largest amount of syrian
Refugees at this point (1.7 million). Those are just the documented ones.

My question mainly was in reference to individual countries increasing the amount they are taking in. Is this occurring in other countries besides Sweden and Germany presently?

About the affect taking in groups of another religion in large numbers that was discussed by another. Yes there are clusters of groups where the majority are muslim and have created a mostly segregated society. Look up Rinkeby in Sweden. Can larger amounts
Of immigrants affect the current poulation. Yes if the current population amounts to ten million and we are taking in 2000 a day. Is this good or bad? I cannot say . It will be interesting in the future though.

~~John Wilkes Booth~~ · 11-10-2015, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lilja

You do realise that turkey has taken in the largest amount of syrian
Refugees at this point (1.7 million). Those are just the documented ones.

nah, i didn't. though it makes sense since they are right there on the border. regardless, the islamic world should take all of the refugees imo.

just like europe and the united states should've taken all the jewish refugees from ww2. it was a mistake to import them to the middle east and it is a mistake to do the same in reverse.