re: homeostasis - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-16-2015, 10:26 PM   #1 (permalink)
Brain Licker
 
Xurtio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth View Post
yea thats all good ori i agree that it all depends on your pov, and my original post about people literally existing to reproduce was from an objective, scientific pov
I have to nitpick at this language, I apologize. I agree with the jist of your opening post but "existing to reproduce" implies purpose and places undue necessity on reproduction for individuals.
__________________
H̓̇̅̉yͤ͏mͬ͂ͧn͑̽̽̌ͪ̑͐͟o̴͊̈́͑̇m͛͌̓ͦ̑aͫ̽ͤ̇n̅̎͐̒ͫ͐c̆ͯͫ̋ ̔̃́eͯ͒rͬͬ̄҉
Xurtio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2015, 09:08 PM   #2 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xurtio View Post
I have to nitpick at this language, I apologize. I agree with the jist of your opening post but "existing to reproduce" implies purpose and places undue necessity on reproduction for individuals.
lol, alright. i disagree tbh. i think about it like this... say we created a race of artificially intelligent androids for the purpose of having realistic android butlers cause we thought that'd be suave or whatever. we learned from and mimicked the design that evolution presented naturally when creating the artificial intelligence necessary to deploy said androids. these androids, as a result, might come to have some genuinely human interests and ambitions, being modeled after humans and all. but that doesn't change the fact that the purpose for which they were designed was to serve as android butlers.... even if in their android mind being an android butler isn't their most valued priority.
John Wilkes Booth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2015, 09:37 PM   #3 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default

Wha.....
__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2015, 06:44 AM   #4 (permalink)
Brain Licker
 
Xurtio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth View Post
lol, alright. i disagree tbh. i think about it like this... say we created a race of artificially intelligent androids for the purpose of having realistic android butlers cause we thought that'd be suave or whatever. we learned from and mimicked the design that evolution presented naturally when creating the artificial intelligence necessary to deploy said androids. these androids, as a result, might come to have some genuinely human interests and ambitions, being modeled after humans and all. but that doesn't change the fact that the purpose for which they were designed was to serve as android butlers.... even if in their android mind being an android butler isn't their most valued priority.
But humans weren't designed, they emerged as a consequence of natural laws. Humans have no objective meaning or purpose and the often determine their own purpose subjectively, or allow others to determine it for them.
__________________
H̓̇̅̉yͤ͏mͬ͂ͧn͑̽̽̌ͪ̑͐͟o̴͊̈́͑̇m͛͌̓ͦ̑aͫ̽ͤ̇n̅̎͐̒ͫ͐c̆ͯͫ̋ ̔̃́eͯ͒rͬͬ̄҉
Xurtio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2015, 10:45 AM   #5 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

how does a 21 year old in the 21st century say groovy?
John Wilkes Booth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2015, 11:07 AM   #6 (permalink)
Ask me how!
 
Oriphiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: The States
Posts: 5,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth View Post
how does a 21 year old in the 21st century say groovy?
I do not know, as I am twenty two, but I suspect they say it something like this: "Groovy!"
Oriphiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2015, 11:20 AM   #7 (permalink)
Just Keep Swimming...
 
Plankton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: See signature...
Posts: 7,765
Default

I believe they pronounce it thusly: Groové
__________________
See location...
Plankton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2015, 11:28 AM   #8 (permalink)
Ask me how!
 
Oriphiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: The States
Posts: 5,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Plankton View Post
Groové
Oriphiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2015, 11:31 AM   #9 (permalink)
Just Keep Swimming...
 
Plankton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: See signature...
Posts: 7,765
Default

Is that Robin Sparkles? I love Robin Sparkles, she's groové.
__________________
See location...
Plankton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2015, 12:56 PM   #10 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

i think that's a scene from natural born killers
John Wilkes Booth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.