|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-01-2015, 06:24 PM | #41 (permalink) | |
you know what it is
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,890
|
Quote:
Also, there are so many bureaucratic rights that that are associated with marriage that it absolutely SHOULD be extended to every citizen. |
|
04-01-2015, 06:34 PM | #42 (permalink) |
Toasted Poster
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
|
Damn right.
__________________
“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.” |
04-01-2015, 07:01 PM | #43 (permalink) | |
Fck Ths Thngs
Join Date: May 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,261
|
Quote:
As someone who doesn't give a sh*t about religion, I don't care how it works as long as gay people have the same rights as everyone else. I don't care if they can't get their "catholic wedding" or whatever, settle it with your church. |
|
04-01-2015, 07:15 PM | #44 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
|
it actually is an interesting conflict when you think about it
cause with businesses clearly so far the rule of the land seems to be discrimination isn't allowed based on sex/creed/race/orientation/etc but then again there is the precedent of religious rights. meaning a religious instution has the right to practice their religion as they see fit, so what if discrimination is part of their religion in the kind of way like abrahamic religion's views on homosexuality/gay marriage? then surely it would be unconstitutional to force a church to give a service for a gay wedding but it's fine to force a pizza place to cater a gay wedding. but then the pizza place is owned by citizens who can invoke their own constitutional rights and say that their religious freedom is being violated by forcing them to participate in a ceremony that their religion forbids. but then what i and others have said about the parallels between this issue and the civil rights movement of the 60's is also true, so when you think about it the really critical difference is just that the predominant religions of our time don't have texts that promote racial segregation as a part of their religious values. if they did then religious people could just as easily use their religious freedom to start white only diners as they could start hetero-only catering services. meaning the logical solution for anyone who wants to discriminate against anyone else is to start a cult that promotes discrimination against that group. |
04-01-2015, 07:26 PM | #45 (permalink) | |
Toasted Poster
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
|
Quote:
__________________
“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.” |
|
04-01-2015, 07:32 PM | #46 (permalink) |
you know what it is
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,890
|
That's a good point. City hall marriages are a thing. I don't know if they inherently include any kind of religious language, but I hope not.
I get what DWV is saying though. Calling it a civil union isn't good enough, even if it entails the same kind of legal rights for LGBT couples. A lot of people don't see those distinctions as being similar. There are homosexual Christians too. |
04-01-2015, 07:35 PM | #47 (permalink) |
SOPHIE FOREVER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East of the Southern North American West
Posts: 35,541
|
I remember a certain regime that allowed for Jews to be refused service just because of their religious affiliation. Not sure how that all ended up tbh.
__________________
Studies show that when a given norm is changed in the face of the unchanging, the remaining contradictions will parallel the truth. |
04-01-2015, 07:55 PM | #48 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,265
|
Washington, Connecticut, and New York have banned all nonessential government-funded travel to Indiana. Hope other states follow suit. A statement from Governor Cuomo of New York:
"Today, I direct all agencies, departments, boards and commissions to immediately review all requests for state funded or state sponsored travel to the State of Indiana and to bar any such publicly funded travel that is not essential to the enforcement of state law or public health and safety. The ban on publicly funded travel shall take effect immediately. New York State has been, and will continue to be, a leader in ensuring that all LGBT persons enjoy full and equal civil rights. With this action, we stand by our LBGT family members, friends and colleagues to ensure that their rights are respected." |
04-01-2015, 07:56 PM | #49 (permalink) | |
Toasted Poster
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
|
Quote:
Are Weddings Religious? - Atheists and Weddings
__________________
“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.” |
|
04-01-2015, 07:57 PM | #50 (permalink) | |||
Dragon
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Kansas, United States
Posts: 2,744
|
Quote:
Quote:
oops. I mean jerusalem. Quote:
By the way, the answer is Germany circa 1940. Last edited by Wpnfire; 04-01-2015 at 08:09 PM. |
|||
|