Animal Rights Disproving Itself

~~Lord Larehip~~ · 10-06-2014, 08:57 PM

The Batlord · 10-06-2014, 09:22 PM

I agree that in many ways this doesn't make much sense, but your average person is eating a steak because they are hungry. This scum was just practicing sadism. If he had gone as far in trying to cause serious injury to a person, with the same mindset, then **** yes he'd be going to jail, as that would be a serious case of assault. We make distinctions between regular assault and a hate crime, so it's not unreasonable to make distinctions between eating a steak and kicking a cat like you would a football.

DwnWthVwls · 10-06-2014, 09:24 PM

I don't think it's disproving itself so much as trying to find a balance between protecting animals used for their products and pets/wildlife. The subject has been around for a long time but it's really only now becoming a main topic for debate; similar to homosexuality.

I like how the newscaster and professor saying it's just "a kick" as if the damage it can cause to the cat versus an adult is even comparable. Do that sh*t to a baby or little kid and then tell me the police wouldn't do anything.

The Batlord · 10-06-2014, 09:34 PM

And whatever the legal inconsistencies, I'd still be perfectly fine if I found out that he'd had his legs broken with a piece of rebar.

GuD · 10-07-2014, 10:48 PM

video wouldn't play all the way through but there's no way a 2 and a half minute discussion can result in all of animal rights activism being in some way self-disproving. Larehip fails again, what a surprise.

**Scarlett O'Hara** · 10-07-2014, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhateverDude

video wouldn't play all the way through but there's no way a 2 and a half minute discussion can result in all of animal rights activism being in some way self-disproving. Larehip fails again, what a surprise.

Franco Pepe Kalle · 10-07-2014, 10:52 PM

I think they should ban him from getting animals again if they want to make a reasonable punishment.

**Janszoon** · 10-07-2014, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhateverDude

video wouldn't play all the way through but there's no way a 2 and a half minute discussion can result in all of animal rights activism being in some way self-disproving. Larehip fails again, what a surprise.

Maybe if he combined it with swastikas it would convince all of us.

**Scarlett O'Hara** · 10-07-2014, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon

Maybe if he combined it with swastikas it would convince all of us.

Guys I'm supposed to be studying, you're distracting me!

Ninetales · 10-07-2014, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon

Maybe if he combined it with swastikas it would convince all of us.

but animals think swastikas are ok why don't you??

10-06-2014, 08:57 PM	#1 (permalink)
~~Lord Larehip~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Jun 2013 Posts: 899	Animal Rights Disproving Itself Will man who kicked cat go to jail?

10-07-2014, 10:48 PM	#5 (permalink)
GuD Dude... What? Join Date: Oct 2013 Posts: 1,322	video wouldn't play all the way through but there's no way a 2 and a half minute discussion can result in all of animal rights activism being in some way self-disproving. Larehip fails again, what a surprise. __________________ I spit bullets in my feet Every time I speak So I write instead And still people want me dead ~msc

10-07-2014, 10:52 PM	#7 (permalink)
Franco Pepe Kalle Mwana Nzala Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Shakopee, Minnesota Posts: 627	I think they should ban him from getting animals again if they want to make a reasonable punishment. __________________ The problem with Franco Pepe Kalle is that he is a unpredictable character. There is surprising info about this man. You think he only likes Franco and Pepe Kalle but when you find out that he hears other artists, you are shock. Girls are the sexy thing that God created. Important to notice FPK.