Xurtio

Well, just coming from a neurophysics background, free will is kind of a supernatural idea if you think about it. It's claiming that some ethereally independent entity makes decisions independent of the laws of the universe.

What makes more sense is that organism behavior is a product of (mostly) deterministic processes playing out: a combination of internal states (genetics, memory, toxicity, trauma, whatever) and external stimulus (current physiological stimuli).

And these experiment demonstrate that when people feel like they've made impulsive, random decisions, they really haven't. A computer algorithm and a little brain monitoring can predict what decision you are going to make with reasonably good accuracy.

__________________
H̓̇̅̉yͤ͏mͬ͂ͧn͑̽̽̌ͪ̑͐͟o̴͊̈́͑̇m͛͌̓ͦ̑aͫ̽ͤ̇n̅̎͐̒ͫ͐c̆ͯͫ̋ ̔̃́eͯ͒rͬͬ̄҉

FRED HALE SR.

We had a discussion similar to this last year. The consensus was that people didn't have freewill and were subject to their environment and the way they were swayed by outside forces.

__________________
" I slashed and burned thru my 15 minutes of fame."

Xurtio

I think that's the most reasonable conclusion... but don't forget internal forces like genetics and psychological states! The stress-diathesis model: two different people will respond to the same environment different ways depending on their past history with the same kind of stimuli, their genetic dispositions, and other confounding biological factors.

I think people tend to forget about developmental factors too.

__________________
H̓̇̅̉yͤ͏mͬ͂ͧn͑̽̽̌ͪ̑͐͟o̴͊̈́͑̇m͛͌̓ͦ̑aͫ̽ͤ̇n̅̎͐̒ͫ͐c̆ͯͫ̋ ̔̃́eͯ͒rͬͬ̄҉

stevie

I just love the way you idiots are hung up on your science. That's some serious faith dudes. Are you all from western Europe, or just the UK. You all are so well schooled, and completely clueless, and this is banter But, I'm probably serious.

RoxyRollah

Exactly whom are you calling an idiot?

__________________