Free Will - an illusion? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-2015, 12:31 PM   #41 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
When talking about the possibility that you're basically a biological machine with no control over your actions, then it's not really all that simple.
I have absolute 100% control over my actions. Don't you?

The Citizen Kane dig was superficial. No biggie. (get past the period correct ridiculous acting and the flick is as deep as they get)
__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 12:38 PM   #42 (permalink)
county fair energy
 
WWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,773
Default

Hard determinist checking in; randomness is the unmoved mover.
WWWP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 12:49 PM   #43 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista View Post
I have absolute 100% control over my actions. Don't you?
Again, we're clearly working with two different definitions, both of which are correct by their own standards. The difference is, I believe mine is helpful in the scientific sense, whereas yours is merely helpful for one's peace of mind (i.e. accepting responsibility for one's actions).

Consider the justice system. By your definition, criminals have made choices that they should be punished for. They could have done "the right thing", but did not, and should pay the consequences for it.

According to my definition of free will, criminals are not responsible for their actions---the concept of responsibility being archaic in general, since it is reliant upon actions made using free will---and should therefore not be treated with the eye-for-an-eye form of justice that our society pretends that it has transcended.

Instead, criminal acts would be analyzed for possible aberrant behavior. Some crimes can be explained away for some reason or another (e.g. crimes of passion or desperation), but others are the result of mental functions that are harmful to themselves and/or society in general. Instead of punishing them, the logical solution would be to introduce stimuli targeted at correcting this behavior in much the same way that you would fix a computer.

Education for criminals without economic opportunities due to a lack of a degree or diploma. Training in trades to give criminals economic opportunities. These things are already happening, and they're a step in the right direction. They're also unintentionally working on the incompatibilist concept of free will, where the brain is a computer that involuntarily responds to stimuli.

Who knows how we can improve prisoner treatment if we recognize this concept. There may be near infinite ways to introduce positive stimuli to these people that would otherwise go ignored by clinging to the common, compatibilist concept of free will. We might also be able to get rid of the stigma attached to criminals that encourages people to treat them as failures and second-class citizens not worthy of our help.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 01:02 PM   #44 (permalink)
Toasted Poster
 
Chula Vista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: SoCal by way of Boston
Posts: 11,332
Default

*farts*

FREE. WILL.
__________________

“The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well,
on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away
and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be.”
Chula Vista is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 02:03 PM   #45 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default

Well, it's hard to argue with that.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 02:41 PM   #46 (permalink)
Born to be mild
 
Trollheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,992
Default

This discussion is too deep and involved for me to get into, but I would like to say that for someone who is generally taken for a videogame-playing, metal-listening headbanging slacker, you argue your case well Batty. You come across as much more intelligent and thoughtful than many of us, myself included, give you credit for. Ever considered a debating society?
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018
Trollheart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 02:58 PM   #47 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trollheart View Post
This discussion is too deep and involved for me to get into, but I would like to say that for someone who is generally taken for a videogame-playing, metal-listening headbanging slacker, you argue your case well Batty. You come across as much more intelligent and thoughtful than many of us, myself included, give you credit for. Ever considered a debating society?
Nah. I'm perfectly happy just knowing I'm smarter than all of you dumb ****s.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 04:03 PM   #48 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,366
Default

Speaking of free will, I keep getting intrusive thoughts, it's really annoying. It's so annoying how it seems like my brain is in control of me, and not the other way around. It sometimes seems to have opinions different from mine.
Same goes for the frequent lucid dreams I have, I'm barely in control.

I also hate how it's impossible to stop thinking, since I automatically overthink things, usually negatively.
Dylstew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 06:04 PM   #49 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chula Vista View Post
I have absolute 100% control over my actions. Don't you?
who is the "i" in this statement? are you your entire body, or just your brain, or just some manifestation of consciousness within your brain, etc?
John Wilkes Booth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 06:16 PM   #50 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
Again, we're clearly working with two different definitions, both of which are correct by their own standards. The difference is, I believe mine is helpful in the scientific sense, whereas yours is merely helpful for one's peace of mind (i.e. accepting responsibility for one's actions).

Consider the justice system. By your definition, criminals have made choices that they should be punished for. They could have done "the right thing", but did not, and should pay the consequences for it.

According to my definition of free will, criminals are not responsible for their actions---the concept of responsibility being archaic in general, since it is reliant upon actions made using free will---and should therefore not be treated with the eye-for-an-eye form of justice that our society pretends that it has transcended.

Instead, criminal acts would be analyzed for possible aberrant behavior. Some crimes can be explained away for some reason or another (e.g. crimes of passion or desperation), but others are the result of mental functions that are harmful to themselves and/or society in general. Instead of punishing them, the logical solution would be to introduce stimuli targeted at correcting this behavior in much the same way that you would fix a computer.

Education for criminals without economic opportunities due to a lack of a degree or diploma. Training in trades to give criminals economic opportunities. These things are already happening, and they're a step in the right direction. They're also unintentionally working on the incompatibilist concept of free will, where the brain is a computer that involuntarily responds to stimuli.

Who knows how we can improve prisoner treatment if we recognize this concept. There may be near infinite ways to introduce positive stimuli to these people that would otherwise go ignored by clinging to the common, compatibilist concept of free will. We might also be able to get rid of the stigma attached to criminals that encourages people to treat them as failures and second-class citizens not worthy of our help.
personally i prefer the concept of an "escape from ny" style prison colony instead of rehabilitating prisoners for re-entry into society.
John Wilkes Booth is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.