Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/)
-   -   Purdue University Shooting (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/75142-purdue-university-shooting.html)

YorkeDaddy 01-22-2014 01:05 PM

Purdue University Shooting
 
Yesterday there was a murder at Purdue University in the electrical engineering building, just a couple hours from where I live (I go to Indiana University) and where a pretty large number of my best friends go to school.

In fact, to make it hit even closer to home, my very best friend and the other member of my band cloudcover is an engineering major at Purdue and spends most of his time in the exact building where someone was just murdered yesterday. He wasn't at the building during the shooting, but that's not really the point.

It's a terrible truth, but shootings like this happen quite often, but when they happen this close to home; this close to the ones you care about, it instills a fear in you unlike anything in the world. What makes it even scarier is that no one can establish a motive. I can only speculate, but if this was really just a random killing for no real reason...it's hard to want to go outside knowing that something like that just happens.

Anyway, there's not a whole lot of discussion possible here, but this is a current event and one that I'm very familiar with and that's part of what this board is about so I figured I'd let it all out here. ****'s not cool.

Frownland 01-22-2014 01:10 PM

Rogert Ebert had a great say on the subject:
Quote:

Let me tell you a story. The day after Columbine, I was interviewed for the Tom Brokaw news program. The reporter had been assigned a theory and was seeking sound bites to support it. "Wouldn't you say," she asked, "that killings like this are influenced by violent movies?" No, I said, I wouldn't say that. "But what about 'Basketball Diaries'?" she asked. "Doesn't that have a scene of a boy walking into a school with a machine gun?" The obscure 1995 Leonardo Di Caprio movie did indeed have a brief fantasy scene of that nature, I said, but the movie failed at the box office (it grossed only $2.5 million), and it's unlikely the Columbine killers saw it.

The reporter looked disappointed, so I offered her my theory. "Events like this," I said, "if they are influenced by anything, are influenced by news programs like your own. When an unbalanced kid walks into a school and starts shooting, it becomes a major media event. Cable news drops ordinary programming and goes around the clock with it. The story is assigned a logo and a theme song; these two kids were packaged as the Trench Coat Mafia. The message is clear to other disturbed kids around the country: If I shoot up my school, I can be famous. The TV will talk about nothing else but me. Experts will try to figure out what I was thinking. The kids and teachers at school will see they shouldn't have messed with me. I'll go out in a blaze of glory."

In short, I said, events like Columbine are influenced far less by violent movies than by CNN, the NBC Nightly News and all the other news media, who glorify the killers in the guise of "explaining" them. I commended the policy at the Sun-Times, where our editor said the paper would no longer feature school killings on Page 1. The reporter thanked me and turned off the camera. Of course the interview was never used. They found plenty of talking heads to condemn violent movies, and everybody was happy.
I agree with him to an extent, because this is a very newsworthy event in America. Maybe as a way to circumvent the "blaze of glory" attitude, names of the killers should not be released. I don't know how well that would mull over, though.

Cuthbert 01-22-2014 01:11 PM

Bad that mate.

Might sound daft but at least if it's happened once in that building then the odds of it happening again must be mental.

I've posted it before but the gun problem in the US seems out of hand.

Plankton 01-22-2014 01:13 PM

I heard about that this morning. Terrible.

I'm just waiting to see what details come out, the who and why, if any. I worked with an Eng Major fresh out of Purdue many years ago (still had that fresh college smell even), and I'm sure he frequented the same digs.

The thing that got me to thinking was that they actually stopped all classes today. It's amazing how the actions of one moron can effect the lives of so many. The trickle down from this will linger for quite a while.

Paul Smeenus 01-22-2014 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Christian Benteke (Post 140909)
I've posted it before but the gun problem in the US seems out of hand.


It's been out of hand for many many years. I loathe and detest the US gun culture

YorkeDaddy 01-22-2014 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1409097)
Rogert Ebert had a great say on the subject:


I agree with him to an extent, because this is a very newsworthy event in America. Maybe as a way to circumvent the "blaze of glory" attitude, names of the killers should not be released. I don't know how well that would mull over, though.

yeah it's hard either way. do americans really need to know about every shooting? they're major events that unite us as a nation, so i think the answer to that is yes. but at the same time, plastering the face of every shooter on every website like the media has done for each of the past few major shootings might convince another troubled individual to do it themselves just like ebert suggested

Frownland 01-22-2014 01:16 PM

If it takes a fatal shooting to unite a nation, I don't want unity.

YorkeDaddy 01-22-2014 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1409103)
If it takes a fatal shooting to unite a nation, I don't want unity.

pretty true. try and list all the recent times the U.S. has seemed to unite as a nation, and everyone will list Sandy Hook, Aurora, the Boston bombing, 9/11...only when people die.

Cuthbert 01-22-2014 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Smeenus (Post 1409101)
It's been out of hand for many many years. I loathe and detest the US gun culture

Realistically do you think there is a solution to it or is it too ingrained now? Cos that's how it seems to me.

Shootings happen here (see something like Raoul Moat and Derrick Bird and it's mental and nationwide news for days and days) but when they do it's very much a rarity, even in the big cities. Over there it seems like it's happening all the time, can think of loads over the past three or four years.

In fact I posted an article last year, there was one mass shooting a day in 2013 in the US up to about September.

Janszoon 01-22-2014 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Christian Benteke (Post 1409105)
Realistically do you think there is a solution to it or is it too ingrained now? Cos that's how it seems to me.

Shootings happen here (see something like Raoul Moat and Derrick Bird and it's mental and nationwide news for days and days) but when they do it's very much a rarity, even in the big cities. Over there it seems like it's happening all the time, can think of loads over the past three or four years.

In fact I posted an article last year, there was one mass shooting a day in 2013 in the US up to about September.

And that's just mass shootings. The majority of gun deaths in the US are not mass shootings.

YorkeDaddy 01-22-2014 01:28 PM

the gun problem is a tough subject for me

on one hand, i do believe that stable individuals should be allowed to own one for defense and even use them for recreation at shooting ranges,

but i think it's too easy to obtain one. but the problem is that if we outlawed firearms, crazy people would still find a way to get a gun. it's not like it's difficult to go out and buy an ounce of marijuana despite it being illegal where i live, and getting a gun would be equally easy despite there obviously being a massive difference between getting some pot and getting a weapon. it's just something we can't really do anything about at this point.

...which makes this country a scary ****ing place

djchameleon 01-22-2014 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Christian Benteke (Post 1409105)

In fact I posted an article last year, there was one mass shooting a day in 2013 in the US up to about September.

I'd like to see that article if you could find it.

This article states there has been one mass shooting every two weeks since 2006. A mass shooting is defined as at least 4 people getting killed.

USA TODAY Investigation: Database of mass shootings, 2006-2013

Also no one is really saying outlaw guns just have stricter laws in place.

Cuthbert 01-22-2014 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YorkeDaddy (Post 1409108)
the gun problem is a tough subject for me

on one hand, i do believe that stable individuals should be allowed to own one for defense and even use them for recreation at shooting ranges,

but i think it's too easy to obtain one. but the problem is that if we outlawed firearms, crazy people would still find a way to get a gun. it's not like it's difficult to go out and buy an ounce of marijuana despite it being illegal where i live, and getting a gun would be equally easy despite there obviously being a massive difference between getting some pot and getting a weapon. it's just something we can't really do anything about at this point.

...which makes this country a scary ****ing place

Happens here, people can still get them but the penalties for possession are enough to put people off and there are a lot of hoops to jump through to acquire one legally. I was looking at getting a high powered air gun for hunting rabbits and even that was a ball ache.

Cuthbert 01-22-2014 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon (Post 1409111)
I'd like to see that article if you could find it.

This article states there has been one mass shooting every two weeks since 2006. A mass shooting is defined as at least 4 people getting killed.

USA TODAY Investigation: Database of mass shootings, 2006-2013

Also no one is really saying outlaw guns just have stricter laws in place.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Christian Benteke (Post 1367799)
Another mass shooting in America - Chicago park shootings: 11 shot and child in critical condition | World news | theguardian.com

That will be the 255th mass shooting in the US this year (defined as four or more people shot in a single incident). Nearly one a day. But lots of guns make the US a safer place.

Every American should carry a gun and then nobody will get shot dead, more guns = fewer deaths. Simple really.

:rolleyes:

There mate.

EDIT - That's the post, bollocks. I will return with the article asap.

EDIT x 2 - I didn't mean mass killing btw, mass shootings.

EDIT x 3 - You know what I can't even be arsed cos I'm watching a football match atm, I saw and read the article at the time, I know this cos people on the forum I took it off were questioning the number but I don't think I actually posted the article. If you still want it I'll try to get it.

Paul Smeenus 01-22-2014 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YorkeDaddy (Post 1409108)
the gun problem is a tough subject for me

on one hand, i do believe that stable individuals should be allowed to own one for defense and even use them for recreation at shooting ranges,

but i think it's too easy to obtain one. but the problem is that if we outlawed firearms, crazy people would still find a way to get a gun. it's not like it's difficult to go out and buy an ounce of marijuana despite it being illegal where i live, and getting a gun would be equally easy despite there obviously being a massive difference between getting some pot and getting a weapon. it's just something we can't really do anything about at this point.

...which makes this country a scary ****ing place


^ this is exactly how I feel. I think that if someone feels that a firearm will protect them and their family they should be allowed to have one. But no one needs uzi's and armor piercing cyanide tipped ammo.

duga 01-22-2014 02:02 PM

I went to Purdue for my undergrad and grad degrees (just moved from Lafayette about 6 months ago) and on top of that my sister still goes there. So it was pretty surreal for me. The way a lot of professors there handled it was pretty disturbing, to be honest. We had a text message alert system and many of them ignored it and continued teaching as if it wasn't a big deal. Purdue was also going to continue normal operations after the arrest had been made, but after students got pissed about the insensitivity of all that, they cancelled classes for today.

This just highlights to me how no one is safe anywhere. It's pretty sad.

YorkeDaddy 01-22-2014 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duga (Post 1409120)
I went to Purdue for my undergrad and grad degrees (just moved from Lafayette about 6 months ago) and on top of that my sister still goes there. So it was pretty surreal for me. The way a lot of professors there handled it was pretty disturbing, to be honest. We had a text message alert system and many of them ignored it and continued teaching as if it wasn't a big deal. Purdue was also going to continue normal operations after the arrest had been made, but after students got pissed about the insensitivity of all that, they cancelled classes for today.

This just highlights to me how no one is safe anywhere. It's pretty sad.

Most of my friends still went to class just a couple hours after the shooting; lots of professors sent out emails saying class was still on and students were still expected to come. The Purdue Review (the student-run magazine) says there were even teachers laughing off the threat during lectures like you said. Seems like it was handled pretty horribly and the teachers need to be fired.

Janszoon 01-22-2014 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duga (Post 1409120)
I went to Purdue for my undergrad and grad degrees (just moved from Lafayette about 6 months ago) and on top of that my sister still goes there. So it was pretty surreal for me. The way a lot of professors there handled it was pretty disturbing, to be honest. We had a text message alert system and many of them ignored it and continued teaching as if it wasn't a big deal. Purdue was also going to continue normal operations after the arrest had been made, but after students got pissed about the insensitivity of all that, they cancelled classes for today.

This just highlights to me how no one is safe anywhere. It's pretty sad.

Yeah, I thought of you when I heard about this. I didn't realize you had a sibling who was still there. Crazy stuff.

duga 01-22-2014 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YorkeDaddy (Post 1409122)
Seems like it was handled pretty horribly and the teachers need to be fired.

I completely agree.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1409123)
Yeah, I thought of you when I heard about this. I didn't realize you had a sibling who was still there. Crazy stuff.

Yeah, I'm just glad that it wasn't a spree. It's incredibly sad, no doubt...I have this weird feeling of relief that my sister was ok and guilt for feeling that way since someone else's family member was killed.

Psy-Fi 01-22-2014 04:06 PM

I saw this article posted somewhere last September. It's probably worth posing in this thread, also...

Mass Shootings Fuel Fear, Account for Fraction of Murders - Bloomberg

Trollheart 01-22-2014 05:30 PM

Did not know about this but glad yourself and Schuyler are ok. Scary scary stuff. Totally agree with Ebert: the media make these things into something that almost glorifies the killers/bombers. Remember the Boston bombers? Of course you do. But do you remember more the people who died or the scumbags who carried out the atrocity?

Whose face was on magazine covers, newspapers and TV screens? Who got more "media attention" and who was talked about more on the internet?

Case proven, and closed.

But as I say, great that you two are ok. Condolences to the victim. Sad day.

The Batlord 01-24-2014 11:48 AM

Alright can we agree to not turn yet another mass shooting story into some twenty-seven page diatribe between pro-gun/anti-gun people? Cause once we're down that rabbit hole this thread is going to get completely jacked.

butthead aka 216 01-24-2014 11:54 AM

Don't worry it wasn't even a mass shooting.

djchameleon 01-24-2014 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1409805)
Alright can we agree to not turn yet another mass shooting story into some twenty-seven page diatribe between pro-gun/anti-gun people? Cause once we're down that rabbit hole this thread is going to get completely jacked.

the last post before yours was two days ago. Why even bother saying that?

You are so late and the thread didn't even go that far down that route.

The Batlord 01-24-2014 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon (Post 1409811)
the last post before yours was two days ago. Why even bother saying that?

You are so late and the thread didn't even go that far down that route.

What's with the hostility?

djchameleon 01-24-2014 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1409812)
What's with the hostility?

I'm not really hostile just asking out of curiosity because it just seems like something that didn't need to be said. The thread discussion was pretty much over and we didn't go that far into have the whole pro-gun/anti-gun discussion.

The Batlord 01-24-2014 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djchameleon (Post 1409821)
I'm not really hostile just asking out of curiosity because it just seems like something that didn't need to be said. The thread discussion was pretty much over and we didn't go that far into have the whole pro-gun/anti-gun discussion.

I just got this thread pointed out to me an hour ago. I honestly didn't know it even existed before let alone that it was dead.

Forward To Death 01-24-2014 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1409097)
Rogert Ebert had a great say on the subject:


I agree with him to an extent, because this is a very newsworthy event in America. Maybe as a way to circumvent the "blaze of glory" attitude, names of the killers should not be released. I don't know how well that would mull over, though.

Hmm, I think people have the right to know who does what crime. If you know the victims, I think you should be able to know the ones who committed the crime as well. I think, and some people might be a little irked by this, they're the more important subjects. They're the ones you can learn from. Not that the victims aren't important, or that they didn't have something important to say, but they're just normal people who dealt with their problems in a healthy, normal way.

I think the root of the problem is usually just mental illness. These kids are delusional, or they're fixating on certain ideas and losing touch with reality at some point. For example, one of the Columbine shooters compared the mission to his favorite video game, Doom, so I definitely think it played a part in his mindset. I don't think video games are at fault, though. You'd have to read some of the killers' journal entries, but they were both very dark creatures. Harris was very angry, and obviously wanted to make a statement to society, whereas Kleibold was just very depressed. I don't think you can really blame video games, Quentin Tarantino movies or the media for any of that, but people will continue to say that's what does it. If you watch too much TV, if you play too many video games, spend too much time on the internet, or listen to the wrong kind of music, you're not living in reality.

It's sort of a chicken-egg thing. I think it's much more logical that these guys were mentally ill before they started playing video, seeing as though there are no studies that can prove that any forms of entertainment can cause mental illness, and it's usually something that you develop as you grow up.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:59 AM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.