The many benefits of a child-free life - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: How do you plead?
I'm a parent 11 17.74%
I'm a child-free woman/man 24 38.71%
I want to have kids someday (please explain) 18 29.03%
I'm undecided 9 14.52%
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-25-2013, 08:33 PM   #161 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: freely swimmin thru the waters of glory much like a majestic bald eagle soars thru the skies
Posts: 1,463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burning Down View Post
I didn't say you couldn't.
ummm ok well i still think its a bad analogy and we can disagree on that. you certainly have infinitely more influence over how your child ends up than you do on whether or not that trigger pull is your last. thats not debatable for me
butthead aka 216 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 08:34 PM   #162 (permalink)
county fair energy
 
WWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butthead aka 216 View Post
ummm ok well i still think its a bad analogy and we can disagree on that. you certainly have infinitely more influence over how your child ends up than you do on whether or not that trigger pull is your last. thats not debatable for me
Did you read my response at all?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
I know what real life is, I've been living in it for well over a decade
Quote:
Originally Posted by jadis View Post
WWWP is pretty but should be cancelled (digital blackface)

#DEMODFROWNLAND
#TERMLIMITSFORMODERATORS
WWWP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 08:36 PM   #163 (permalink)
Maelian
 
ladyislingering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 695
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butthead aka 216 View Post
i hope youve changed from 18 to 25. if not, thats sad
I have, naturally - mostly due to poor decisions. I wish I would have had the rational thought thing down when I was 18. It would have saved me a lot of grief.
__________________
You and I,
We were born to die.
ladyislingering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 08:37 PM   #164 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: freely swimmin thru the waters of glory much like a majestic bald eagle soars thru the skies
Posts: 1,463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Junkyard Donner View Post
Did you read my response at all?
yah and thats why i said theres things we obviously cant control and can only teach how to deal with those things. i just dont agree with your thinkin as far as havin kids. i dont find bearin children immoral for someone like myself.
butthead aka 216 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 08:38 PM   #165 (permalink)
The Music Guru.
 
Burning Down's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beyond the Wall
Posts: 4,858
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butthead aka 216 View Post
ummm ok well i still think its a bad analogy and we can disagree on that. you certainly have infinitely more influence over how your child ends up than you do on whether or not that trigger pull is your last. thats not debatable for me
But you can't ignore the nature side of the "nature vs nurture" argument. Before I posted, Steph left a post in response to you that I think you should read.
Burning Down is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 08:40 PM   #166 (permalink)
Shoo Thoughts
 
Mr. Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: These Mountains
Posts: 2,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Junkyard Donner View Post
Well, yeah. The backbone of the philosophy is that there is a negative value assigned to birth. It's all about the negativity, man. :p

I wasn't directing that comment at you, btw. "Insane" was a word used by someone in real life. And I totally get it, it does seem insane and bizarre and unjustified but I've spent a lot - A LOT - of time and energy researching and pondering and reading and questioning everything about antinatalism and I just haven't yet come across anything that invalidates it. The closest I've gotten is "Schopenhauer's a dick." I consider myself open minded in regards to my stance on this philosophy in that I'm very willing to have my mind changed, but it would take a ****load of convincing.
So it's an extension of Schopenhauer's philosophy? I've read one of his books, On The Suffering Of The World. He seemed a clever guy and quite insightful but rather depressive with it. Much like Nietzsche in that respect.

Personally, I have a hard time putting my faith in any philosophy that can't make it's creator happy. It is my firm belief that Nature creates everything for it's own good, sure sometimes thing go wrong and things are born with defects and/or diseases, but generally speaking we are all equipped to experience the joy of life. Strip away the heavy thinking, the desire to make sense of everything, the thirst for knowledge, and all abstractions of the mind and I believe we get down to the base human condition, a condition of joy.

Anyway, like I alluded to earlier, I'm not putting your ideas down. Merely presenting an alternative.
Mr. Charlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 08:41 PM   #167 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Junkyard Donner View Post
Well, yeah. The backbone of the philosophy is that there is a negative value assigned to birth. It's all about the negativity, man. :p

I wasn't directing that comment at you, btw. "Insane" was a word used by someone in real life. And I totally get it, it does seem insane and bizarre and unjustified but I've spent a lot - A LOT - of time and energy researching and pondering and reading and questioning everything about antinatalism and I just haven't yet come across anything that invalidates it. The closest I've gotten is "Schopenhauer's a dick." I consider myself open minded in that I'm very willing to have my mind changed, but it takes a ****load of convincing.
I just wanted to put that out there, bizarre isn't the same as insane but it dawned on me that it was less than polite.

I don't actually disagree with the idea that imposing life is imposing harm, when it gets right down to it. I know what you're saying there. I just disagree that imposing harm is an absolute wrong. If the harm comes bundled with all the joys of existence, then I can't see it as a bad deal in most cases.

And when I think about the fact that our brains are a part of the tiny tiny percentage of matter in the known universe with the capacity for consciousness, I usually think of that as an amazing privilege rather than a burden to bear, though it is admittedly both.

I don't expect any of that to change your mind, that's just where I'm at with it.
John Wilkes Booth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 08:43 PM   #168 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: freely swimmin thru the waters of glory much like a majestic bald eagle soars thru the skies
Posts: 1,463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burning Down View Post
But you can't ignore the nature side of the "nature vs nurture" argument. Before I posted, Steph left a post in response to you that I think you should read.
whos ignorin nature?? i just said a few times theres things you cant control in life and nobody would disagree with that.

could have a kid with a deadly disease, could have a kid get hit by a car, etc. im thinkin about my graduatin class of a few hundred. how many have cancer? got killed by a car? maybe 4-5 out of a few hundred. nurture has a far greater influence than nature, and thats why i said its a bad analogy (russioan roulette). because there isnt a 20% chance or whatever that youre kid is gonna have any of that happen to them.

i will take any sufferin to have the glory. we all would. or else if life was so unbearable youd all have offed yourselves by now
butthead aka 216 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 08:47 PM   #169 (permalink)
Maelian
 
ladyislingering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 695
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butthead aka 216 View Post
could have a kid with a deadly disease, could have a kid get hit by a car, etc. im thinkin about my graduatin class of a few hundred. how many have cancer? got killed by a car?
And there's another reason I don't find breeding to be a great idea. I already have to deal with the pain of knowing that the people in my life will die someday; I don't want to risk losing a child. Better to save the money it takes to raise a kid than to lose it to some unforeseen tragedy. (Funerals are pretty expensive, too.)

Quote:
i will take any sufferin to have the glory. we all would. or else if life was so unbearable youd all have offed yourselves by now
That hasn't stopped a number of us from trying, whether it be in the past or recently. Nobody ever talks about that sort of thing, but I get the feeling there are some among us (even in this thread) who have legitimately considered or attempted suicide.
__________________
You and I,
We were born to die.
ladyislingering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2013, 08:47 PM   #170 (permalink)
Shoo Thoughts
 
Mr. Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: These Mountains
Posts: 2,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth View Post

And when I think about the fact that our brains are a part of the tiny tiny percentage of matter in the known universe with the capacity for consciousness, I usually think of that as an amazing privilege rather than a burden to bear, though it is admittedly both.
Indeed. It makes one wonder whether consciousness is an integral part of the universe, whether the universe 'wants' to be conscious, or maybe want is a poor choice of words, if the universe is arranged in such a way that consciousness is common and unavoidable. Or is consciousness a crazy fluke that happened amidst crazy odds. Either way it's pretty remarkable that the same stuff in rocks and stars and water can evolve to the point where it can ask 'what am I'. It's quite nuts.
Mr. Charlie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.