![]() |
lol are you sure about that? i would have to google to see if any of that can really get you locked up if it is consensual (unless someone lies about it being consensual after the fact). if so then i think that's more of an injustice than banning it in porn. especially verbal abuse wtf.
edit - are you talking UK law or US law? |
Yes, go research it. Not guaranteed conviction but you can certainly be charged, and the BDSM site I belong to has forums dedicated to legal help for that kind of stuff.
I don't know about verbal abuse, i should have deleted that part. I copied it in for the physical abuse aspect. I mean even people in the porn industry have gotten in legal trouble for being too rough on camera and they have contracts, which to me = consent. Idk how it works in the legal system. Max Hardcore is the biggest incident that comes to mind. Edit: US Law |
but how can you be charged unless the police bust in while you're in the act? unless your partner lies about the consent part afterwards and presses charges.... which complicates things a bit.
|
From what I've read people had the cops called on them for being too loud, or reports are filed from people seeing bruising. This stuff can get pretty intense.
Mild impact play: Spoiler for NSFW:
I've seen people with their entire ass/thighs black and blue. Not to mention other more sensitive areas. |
i dunno how people get into that **** but it should be legal if it's consensual imo. then again i shouldn't be surprised since there are still states with sodomy laws as far as i remember.
edit - though tbh this is the reason why i wouldn't mess with that stuff even if i was into it. because the chick could always turn around and say you beat her if she got mad at you for whatever reason. same reason why i would never mess with anyone under aged even when i was barely legal myself. |
Play parties/conventions are the best option for people breaking into the scene imo. This way there are witnesses in case something happens after the fact. It's definitely risky, but I don't know anyone personally who has ever got in any legal trouble over it.
And this stuff doesn't always lead to sex. Some people just enjoy being tied or spanked. Edit: I think it basically boils down to following the same legal lines as not being allowed to consent to your own death or someone breaking your legs, taking your kidney, etc. |
When will Conservative parties learn that purtism costs them votes & libertarianism does not.
U.K. Sex Workers Sitting on Each Other's Faces for Their Right to Fist Sex workers just held a facesitting protest outside the UK parliament to fight for their right to be able to engage in certain internet porn acts which are to be banned. These include.... "no spanking, no bondage, no watersports, no fisting, no squirting, and, of course, no facesitting." Can someone please tell me how facesitting, which is usually an act of sexual dominance by a woman promotes violence against woman or a threat to society. Can someone please tell me why thousands of people who most likely engage in facesitting, spanking and little bit of bondage with their boyfriends and girlfriends, are now to be singled out to feel like complete perverts because some weirdo authoritarian bureaucrats has decided to tell people in the UK what is pure and normal, and what is not. It's stuff like this that really pisses me off, I assumed the law was to ban violent role play scenes against women, not a spanking! In Canada the Tories are attempting to drive prostitution further underground and are coming out hard against marijuana. I've never engaged in the former and rarely do the latter, but as one of those sought after independent voters who swings left & right, I'll I have to say is....NO tory vote for you! I'm going with Justin Trudeau. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:13 PM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.