A woman has two kids, one of them is a girl

anticipation · 03-03-2013, 11:17 AM

congrats on another horrible thread.

The Batlord · 03-04-2013, 09:40 AM

I'm too lazy to go and look, but I'm pretty sure I heard that there is a higher percentage of females to males. Which would make sense if we evolved to live in groups led by one dominant male who mated with a large number of females. Having as many males as females might be a waste of resources. Of course there isn't an option for a higher chance of it being a girl besides 100%, so I choose anal beads. And since that isn't an option, I refuse to vote out of protest.

Face · 03-04-2013, 10:04 AM

If anything it should be slightly higher than 50%. If they are twins then they're more likely to be the same sex. So 51%. Picked 50. And any gender variation such as asexual/haemophrodite/statistical variations like slight changes in birthrates thrown in wouldn't tip it more than 5% either way.

Especially since the scenario doesn't outline if the known girl is the younger or older sibling

P A N · 03-04-2013, 12:12 PM

i'm going to say 33% because if it's a boy, natural selection has created a group ratio of 2:1. it seems to me that there needs to be more women because birthing is a longer process than f*cking. and i have no other input on this other than to say i deduced it from a beach boys song.

FRED HALE SR. · 03-04-2013, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anticipation

congrats on another horrible thread.

wiggums · 03-04-2013, 02:37 PM

It's a trick question. She's barren.

Key · 03-04-2013, 02:38 PM

50%. She'll either have a boy or a girl.

midnight rain · 03-04-2013, 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anticipation

congrats on another horrible thread.

more productive than that 'MB was so much better back in the day' delusion youve been under

answer is 33% cause there's four different possibilities:

BG
GB
BB
GG

Because one of them is already a girl, that dismisses the possibility of BB, leaving:

BG
GB
GG

Since one of them is already a girl, 1/3 chance the other will also be a girl (GG)

Burning Down · 03-04-2013, 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuna

more productive than that 'MB was so much better back in the day' delusion youve been under

answer is 33% cause there's four different possibilities:

BG
GB
BB
GG

Because one of them is already a girl, that dismisses the possibility of BB, leaving:

BG
GB
GG

Since one of them is already a girl, 1/3 chance the other will also be a girl (GG)

I'm not sure if I understand this logic. Are you trying to use the Punnett square technique to determine sex? Because then all four choices would still apply for subsequent children.

**Scarlett O'Hara** · 03-04-2013, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuna

more productive than that 'MB was so much better back in the day' delusion youve been under

I think you and me are making the most threads lately! I go through phases of thread ideas. But yeah MB is just as good now as it was before. However people are a lot more whiney these days, including me!

View Poll Results: What are the chances the other is also a girl?
0%	1	9.09%
25%	0	0%
33%	4	36.36%
50%	5	45.45%
100%	1	9.09%
Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll

03-04-2013, 02:37 PM	#26 (permalink)
wiggums A Sarcastic Joyful Sound Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Montana Posts: 174	It's a trick question. She's barren. __________________

03-03-2013, 11:17 AM	#21 (permalink)
anticipation Music Addict Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 3,565	congrats on another horrible thread.

03-04-2013, 10:04 AM	#23 (permalink)
Face Music Addict Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: UK Posts: 306	If anything it should be slightly higher than 50%. If they are twins then they're more likely to be the same sex. So 51%. Picked 50. And any gender variation such as asexual/haemophrodite/statistical variations like slight changes in birthrates thrown in wouldn't tip it more than 5% either way. Especially since the scenario doesn't outline if the known girl is the younger or older sibling

03-04-2013, 12:12 PM	#24 (permalink)
P A N DO LIKE YOU. Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 629	i'm going to say 33% because if it's a boy, natural selection has created a group ratio of 2:1. it seems to me that there needs to be more women because birthing is a longer process than f*cking. and i have no other input on this other than to say i deduced it from a beach boys song.

03-04-2013, 02:38 PM	#27 (permalink)
Key . Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 13,153	50%. She'll either have a boy or a girl.