|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
View Poll Results: Who has your vote? | |||
OBAMA/BIDEN | 35 | 59.32% | |
ROMNEY/RYAN | 7 | 11.86% | |
My cat. | 17 | 28.81% | |
Voters: 59. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-09-2012, 10:14 PM | #161 (permalink) |
Account Disabled
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,538
|
Intelligence is only correlated with income as higher levels of education tend to produce better job opportunities. It is, however, a logical fallacy to imply that correlation equals causation. People aren't less intelligent because they're poor, people who come from lower income areas and families and can't afford education are less likely to meet the rigorously defined study criteria for intelligence precisely because they can't afford the higher education that would allow them to meet such criteria.
This of course has nothing to do with their cognition, either. The jobless aren't jobless because they're stupid, lazy, irresponsible, or don't want to work. They're out of work for a variety of factors, more than can just be brushed aside and chalked up to personal responsibility. That kind of callousness toward those who need our support is exactly why Romney doesn't have my respect as political candidate. Frankly, I'm tired of what the Republican party has come to stand for. Big business, not big government. It's not a conspiracy theory. Republicans want free market capitalism. Well guess what, so do I. I love capitalism. It lets me eat fried chicken even though I know it's terrible for me. But FUCK IT. When that chicken eventually gives me a heart attack, I'd like the same government I've proudly given my tax dollars to, the same government I may be expected to defend in times of crisis, the same into community to which I was born and supported until my moment of crisis, TO HELP ME THE FUCK OUT. How the FUCK is universal healthcare bad for the country? How the FUCK is a social safety net an affront to your personal liberties? We pay taxes that ultimately do FUCK ALL but go to bullshit spending programs enacted to make sure the funding doesn't stop coming in. Libertarians may tell me it was my fault for eating the fried chicken to begin with. It was. I respect that. I respect what Libertarians want, economically speaking. But if we're so hung up on personal accountability, on eye for eye justice, on putting ideology ahead of human beings, then we'll let people suffer and die simply for making the wrong decisions. Life is short, life is confusing. Some people are born with good circumstances, others in poverty. Some have strength, motivation, and drive. Others are fatigued, plagued, and frail. Some have access to education, others don't. The government could compete directly with private corporations for healthcare. Better healthcare is available if you can afford it. If not, you won't be left without treatment because of your economic circumstances. Obama's healthcare plan hardly even goes that far, and yet it's derided by the right as "socialist", as if that phrase even holds weight as a pejorative. Yet, the Republican Party is largely pro-life, anti stem cell research, pro-war on drugs, and devoutly religious to the point that it affects policies. So much for that constitution you all want to restore. So much for personal freedom from big govment. The Republican Party is a fucking joke. It's all about getting those precious Reagan years back. Libertarians have my respect, and unless the Republicans win this year or make drastic changes, they seem poised to take their place in some sense or another. |
10-10-2012, 08:23 AM | #162 (permalink) | |
Mwana Nzala
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Shakopee, Minnesota
Posts: 627
|
Quote:
__________________
The problem with Franco Pepe Kalle is that he is a unpredictable character. There is surprising info about this man. You think he only likes Franco and Pepe Kalle but when you find out that he hears other artists, you are shock. Girls are the sexy thing that God created. Important to notice FPK. |
|
10-10-2012, 09:38 AM | #163 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
|
Quote:
Flynn, for whom the Flynn effect is named, among others. Regarding your hyperbolic, emotive points: link
__________________
Have mercy on the poor. |
|
10-10-2012, 09:44 AM | #164 (permalink) | ||
Zum Henker Defätist!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
10-10-2012, 11:23 AM | #166 (permalink) |
Blunt After Blunt After
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: In a French-ass restaurant
Posts: 337
|
That is a comment so hilariously stupid that by your own standards it wouldn't scrape minimum wage. If you genuinely, seriously believe that the working class is in the position they're in due to them not being as intelligent as the rich then I can only come to the conclusion that you've spent your entire life in some kind of bubble doing nothing but watching objectivist filmography that glorifies Gina Rinehart as der ubermensch.
|
10-10-2012, 02:03 PM | #167 (permalink) | |
Make it so
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,181
|
Quote:
__________________
"Elph is truly an enfant terrible of the forum, bless and curse him" - Marie, Queen of Thots
|
|
10-11-2012, 12:39 AM | #168 (permalink) | ||
"Hermione-Lite"
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New York.
Posts: 3,084
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
10-11-2012, 09:31 AM | #169 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
|
The relevance is obvious. If x tendency is true, the larger the sample size the more the results will bear out the tendency. So, if, say, 33% of convicted paedophiles are repeat offenders, the possibility that any given sample of paedophiles won't bear out this statistical truth decreases as the sample size increases. Hence why a sample size of ONE is meaningless.
__________________
Have mercy on the poor. |
10-12-2012, 11:26 AM | #170 (permalink) |
Born to be mild
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 404 Not Found
Posts: 26,994
|
Anyone have any thoughts on the debate? Watched it just now and thought that Ryan kept repeating a mantra that conveniently sidestepped any questions, but Biden seemed a little lost at times, stumbling over words and getting a little lost, which I fear may show him as coming out less strongly in the debate as a whole.
In general though, I don't think it did much to change anyone's opinion. Ryan had nothing new to say, and anyone who is going to vote for Romney will, but anyone whose mind was not made up is, I think, unlikely to have been swayed by Ryan's non-arguments. Similarly for Biden, I think the idea "let us finish the job" has been well-touted by the Obama camp now, and you either believe it or you don't. One small point: I think Biden made something of a gaffe by not thanking Ryan in the closing statement, and when Ryan DID thank Biden, I believe he scored a point, especially with his "It's been an honour to debate with you Joe" remark. Overall though I don't see this as having the power to change or make up any voters' minds. Anyone agree? Think differently? What do I know: I'm just an Irish gob****e. It's you that are going to eventually make the decision to either change or re-elect the administration...
__________________
Trollheart: Signature-free since April 2018 |
|