This is a... podcast?... about history etc thats pretty good. This video is a sample of the episode about slavery "Addicted to Bondage". It's about and hour long and the real thing in its entirety talks more about American slavery - but this snippet is still interesting even if it isn't as much about american slavery.

The US model of slavery was quite unique and really can't be compared with slavery say in the Roman Empire etc. The US model was based on race with slaves being imported from a different continent. Traditionally, slaves have usually been recognized by the clothes they wore and places they frequented. The US slave was recognized instantly by his skin colour.

Granted.

It was the most clear cut example of racial slavery. Hard to compete with a difference as obvious as black vs. white skin when you're talking about humans.

It is a podcast. Dan Carlin's Hardcore History is fantastic. One of the only podcasts I listen to on a regular basis. Good call!

You are all simplifying the interplay of race and slavery in the context of the USA; some examples being -

-the first person legally recognized as property, in the colonial USA, was black
---as was his owner
-Indians also owned slaves; some after the civil war

So, let's be clear; black's owned black slaves; indian's owned black slaves; and whites owned black slaves. The issue of chattel slavery vs. traditional is of course important (and obvious); but, let's keep in mind we're speaking of this slavery occurring in the same time period, and all these groups had members who participated in brutal chattel slavery.

In this, we see such a system of slavery was not unique to the USA, but also existed in Latin America, notably in Brazil. I'm sure you're all familiar with las Casas and the role he played in substituting slavery of Indians with that of Africans.

If you're going to advocate the notion that multiculturalism & racial egalitarianism is a genuinely moral in the full meaning of the word, fine, but that notion is directly at odds with the concept that racism is acceptable at times. What you're trying to say is something to the effect of, "The ends don't justify the means, except when they do."

That is, unless I misread you and you're claiming that racism is positive some times.


You're presuming multiculturalism can work, you're ignoring that multiculturalism is a phenomenon exclusive to the west, and your fatalism is anything but convincing.

The first point you've raised is all good and well about different races in the USA having slaves, but on closer anaylysis its actually an apologetic right-wing view stating that it just wasn't whites that had slaves. We all know though, that the largest slave holders were whites.

The reference to Casas in Latin America, is totally inadequate in this debate. Here we are talking about a 16th century historian that was in the service of Spain. Spain at that time was an absolute monarchy that ruled the seas, everybody was either a Catholic or a heathen and God reigned supreme and the Pope gave the King or Queen of Spain absolute power to carry out God's work, the word democracy would've had you chucked into the nearest dungeon before being sent to the gallows. The USA that we are talking about here, is in the 19th century and in a land that was built on demoocracy and equal rights for all men etc. Slavery by the 19th century in the USA had become an abomination of those beliefs.

For the record and its worth pointing out, that the reason why black slaves were brought to Latin America was just basically to replace the local indigenous slaves who had died in their millions due to common European ailments, the negro slaves were just brought from Africa to replace depeleted local slaves not because Casas or the Spanish felt sorry for the locals. Evidence of this is very common still today, in countries like Brazil, Colombia and Venezuela and much of the Caribbean which were decimated by the Spanish and Portuguese much of the local populations were wiped out, for that reason you will see very high negro populations in the places today. If you go to say Bolivia, Paraguay and Chile its doubtful you'll even see a negro, largely because these areas were relatively untouched by the Spanish and Portuguese.

Now I'm not sure what you're referring to in you final section, but NO racism is never acceptable under any circumstances and if it does exist in a society, that that said society is really not operating as a democracy should.

Guys.

Arguing about historical models of slavery and why we had slavery and blah blah blah is all well and good... but we're all ignoring the fact that slavery is happening RIGHT NOW.

So can we end the pointless discussion that is annoying everyone involved and maybe talk about an issue that is affecting living human beings at this very moment?

http://www.photobrazil.com/gallery/l...pste0420bw.jpg

Well this thread is about a historical model:p:

Brazil hardly operates as a democracy and most booming economies of the developing world operate off the back of slave labour in one way or another anyway so the article might be shocking but hardly surprising. They are strictly dog eat dog societies.

True enough. It just really, really, really bothers me that there is a severe lack of serious talk about modern slavery. Not necessarily here in this thread, just in life in general. Americans, at least, like to think that Lincoln took care of slavery everywhere forever, and that's that. I don't know about other nations, but that is just... horrible.

Surprising isn't the point here, the point is that there are people out there that are under someone else's thumb who are suffering because their "masters" decide that they should. I think that the "shrug" attitude many have for people in general today is appalling. We see murders, starvation, slavery, sex crimes, and genocide on the news and ALL WE DO IS SHRUG. "Oh well, there's nothing I can do about it, guess I'll just turn off the TV and pretend it isn't happening."

AND THAT PISSES ME OFF.

/endrant

Note: This was not particularly directed at anyone in here, I'm just... REALLY mad about this.

I agree the world just shrugs, if there's no oil to be had nobody really gives a shit about how people are treated within a country, but in the end they try and do something about it as society expects it. In most societies of the world the gap between those that have and those that don't have is actually growing (I don't have a link to back that up) but its a juicy debate.