Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/)
-   -   God is in your mind? (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/60024-god-your-mind.html)

blastingas10 12-17-2011 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RVCA (Post 1133823)
Why would a universe that lacks a creator have "purpose"? If you don't believe that a sentient being sits behind the curtains and calls the shots, then from what source is a "purpose" derived to be attributed to our existence, or the existence of the universe?

And how does this discussion of purpose even relate to irreducible complexity?

I guess I should have been more clear and said that I don't believe in the traditional sense of a creator. I just believe there is something much deeper about our universe. I don't believe that it all sprang up from nothing.

Salami 12-17-2011 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blastingas10 (Post 1133865)
I guess I should have been more clear and said that I don't believe in the traditional sense of a creator. I just believe there is something much deeper about our universe. I don't believe that it all sprang up from nothing.

You don't believe in ex nihilo? Even Christians believe there was nothing before the beginning.

Surely you believe in the big bang?If not, then why are galaxies moving away from each other? They must have been propelled away somehow.

blastingas10 12-17-2011 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mighty Salami (Post 1133868)
You don't believe in ex nihilo? Even Christians believe there was nothing before the beginning.

Surely you believe in the big bang?If not, then why are galaxies moving away from each other? They must have been propelled away somehow.

I don't think the big bang should be considered as a fact. Scientists have found rings of radiation in the cosmos that may be older than the Big Bang, suggesting that event was just the latest in a series of rebirths. I think scientists will and should continue to challenge each other and continue to progress our knowledge about the world rather than concluding and halting our progression of knowledge. Unless something is absolutely undeniable.

Salami 12-17-2011 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blastingas10 (Post 1133879)
I don't think the big bang should be considered as a fact. Scientists have found rings of radiation in the cosmos that may be older than the Big Bang, suggesting that event was just the latest in a series of rebirths. I think scientists will and should continue to challenge each other and continue to progress our knowledge about the world rather than concluding and halting our progression of knowledge. Unless something is absolutely undeniable.

But surely you don't believe in the fixed state theory? Even Fred Hoyle admitted he was wrong about that.

blastingas10 12-17-2011 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mighty Salami (Post 1133907)
But surely you don't believe in the fixed state theory? Even Fred Hoyle admitted he was wrong about that.

I suppose I do unless there is a good, sensible argument against it.

Salami 12-17-2011 05:28 PM

Well, surely if galaxies are moving away from each other rapidly, then they must have been propelled away from each other somehow. And this propulsion must mean some kind of collision or explosion must have occurred. Hence the big bang.

blastingas10 12-17-2011 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mighty Salami (Post 1133924)
Well, surely if galaxies are moving away from each other rapidly, then they must have been propelled away from each other somehow. And this propulsion must mean some kind of collision or explosion must have occurred. Hence the big bang.

I understand that. But I don't doubt that there is more about the big bang than what we currently understand.

Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra 12-17-2011 05:48 PM

God is in my mirror... but that might just be in my mind.

Rubato 12-17-2011 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mighty Salami (Post 1133924)
Well, surely if galaxies are moving away from each other rapidly, then they must have been propelled away from each other somehow. And this propulsion must mean some kind of collision or explosion must have occurred. Hence the big bang.

or a white hole? just throwing it out there :p:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra (Post 1133927)
God is in my mirror... but that might just be in my mind.

You're Al Pacino?

RVCA 12-17-2011 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blastingas10 (Post 1133865)
I guess I should have been more clear and said that I don't believe in the traditional sense of a creator. I just believe there is something much deeper about our universe. I don't believe that it all sprang up from nothing.

If you don't believe in a traditional creator, and you don't believe it all sprang up from nothing, I'm curious as what your beliefs exactly are. Mind elaborating?

Quote:

Originally Posted by blastingas10 (Post 1133879)
I don't think the big bang should be considered as a fact. Scientists have found rings of radiation in the cosmos that may be older than the Big Bang, suggesting that event was just the latest in a series of rebirths. I think scientists will and should continue to challenge each other and continue to progress our knowledge about the world rather than concluding and halting our progression of knowledge. Unless something is absolutely undeniable.

It's not considered a fact. No (credible) scientist considers The Big Bang Theory a fact, and that's because it's a theory. The Big Bang theory is currently the most reliable theory of creation that is most fully supported by observation and mathematics.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:18 AM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.