Blastin you are my hero dude

Logic can be subjective from one person to the next, but technical logic still exists. An assumption, for example, is a logical fallacy. You can dispute the legitimacy of the rules of logic all day, but at the end it's still blatant that an assumption is by definition unsubstantial.

"truth" is constantly changing, and that's why there's a theory that absolutes cannot exist, the exception to the rule being the rule itself. Personally, that seems pretty ridiculous, and the theory breaks it's own rule, and it leaves everything open for discussion. When you think about it, it almost makes sense. Nothing is really for certain. Everything from mathematics, existence, morality, etc. is up for debate.

I personally don't believe in any supreme being, but I don't deny the existence of one (or even multiple). When I'm dead, maybe I'll find out. Maybe not, maybe there are gods and no afterlife.

Forward, thank you for your post, almost exactly what I have been saying, there is no one truth all realities exist at the same time, and you brought up a good point, what is there in this world that is not debatable, that is what needs to be sought out, does anyone know what that is? It is emotions and how they feel, love=good, anger/judgement = bad

I wouldn't call them realities, just possibilities.

I think the "can't be quantified=does not exist" attitude of most atheists is as irrational as making the assumption that a deity exists.

Isn't love the deity that exists in all of us.
Here is to those that love for they shine a light on the world and here is to those who hate cause they only hate cause they don't feel loved.

This methodology is something you use to build an understanding of the world piece by piece. You build it with big, fat bricks and a strong foundation - well tested "truths". Otherwise you end up with a house of cards where the whole thing can come crashing down because the assumptions making up the fundament where based on faulty theory or flimsy thought and so everything based on them likewise.

It doesn't mean that you can't think big, interesting thoughts. It doesn't mean you can't be innovative or even revolutionary. Scientists achieve tremendous things every day. It just means that you should be critical.

I'm for open minds. I just think people should be careful not to fill them with lies.

I dunno, I think there are some people perfectly incapable of love, man.

What if someone hates someone for killing their spouse? Does that also come from a lack of love?

Yeah, and I've yet to see solid proof of deities. Although, this is why religion is often referred to as faith. It's just as hard to disprove as it is to prove, and that's what's so tricky about any religious topic; all you can really do is speculate.

My parents are very religious (even if it is a faux religious complex) and when they get drunk they try to antagonize me into arguing with them, and I can't really say I've heard any other take on religion. It always seems lime it's backed with "how did the planets get here" and "why do we exist", and it always seems to end with me being accused of being a heathen. I'm not saying those are the only types of religious people, or that there aren't better arguments, but that's what it always comes down to when you're discussing religion.

Why isn't gay marriage universally accepted yet? It's such a primitive ideology.

I dunno Jesus said to do what he says and then you will know if there is a god or not, I guess the only way to know for sure is to try all avenues. God is love. To tores last post I think the answer is an obvious YES. Hate is a lack of love.