God is in your mind?

MoonlitSunshine · 03-06-2012, 05:08 PM

You're confusing possible implication and necessary implication. The flu virus causes the flu. it is the only thing that causes the flu and it if called the flu virus because it causes the flu. That said, you can carry the flu virus in your body, and not have the flu.

In the case, Carcinogens cause cancer. They are called carcinogens because they cause cancer, but you can have carcinogens in your body and not get cancer. Does that make sense?

Guybrush · 03-06-2012, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seekn4

This is all I'm saying if it is carcinogens that cause cancer, than everyone who smokes would get it and that's not the case, so there has to be more to the story, that one isn't enough for me, to call it fact, how come for some and not others, could belief be the missing link? Too many question unanswered to call anything fact. And I think I have been misunderstood, I'm just saying truth for one isn't truth for another.

I explained this to you actually. You can read my explanation in this post.

Neapolitan · 03-06-2012, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seekn4

All I'm saying guy is to believe anything is impossible is just plain foolish, if u were alive 100 years ago u would have believed that going to space was impossible, now how many other generations believed something was impossible and were proved wrong. There are people who actually walk on 1700 degree hot coals and their flesh doesn't get burned, according to yalls believes that is impossible yet it happens, its even in the guineas book, and what allows them to do that is their beliefs, so maybe we shotuld take a little more head to the power of our beliefs. There is more than u can even imagine in this world. And with the internet nothing is hid. And there is mo proof that carcinogens cause cancer, according to all the studies we can't get away com them they r in just about everything we come in contact with, so y don't we all get cancer. There are too many questions to be raised to have any degree of certainty on that subject, still theory. Matters of faith and belief can't be proven to anyone else but yourself by searching within yourself. And your definition of an open mind must be flawed, cause to not believe that anything can be possible is not an open mind. And one day u will be that guy that didn't believe that going to space was possibe and watching the first space flight. And the laws of physics have changed in the recent year u might want to study up on quantum physics, not wikapedia, but actually study until u understand what they r saying, maybe research the double slit experiments to start. Not to be rude but its like nobody knows anything unless its been on the news, the mainstream, reports science things 10 years after the experiments have been in the works, the double slit experiment is 20 years old and nobody has heard of it. Y because it blows the doors off of everything we have been taught to believe. With what we have seen in history to belive something is impossible is more foolish than to believe anything is impossible.

OK children - listen up :
Guiness Book of World Records, Good

Wikapedia, Bad

Quote:

Originally Posted by seekn4

If u want your proof that our belief can actually change the way sub atomic particles react I suggest u take a month or two and study quantum physics

Or just watch this cartoon for five minutes:

Guybrush · 03-06-2012, 05:31 PM

For the record, I know about double slit experiments and waveform collapse. What I disagree with is the idea that quarks are not subject to gravity and that this can somehow be utilized by humans in such a way that it allows us to walk on water.

If anyone can find some evidence to the opposite, I am all ears.

blastingas10 · 03-06-2012, 06:38 PM

I wish there was a intelligent religious person here to balance this argument, 'cause it's completely one-sided. I haven't really been following the argument, but all you know-it-all's, you can't honestly believe that we (humans) have an understanding for everything. I don't see how anyone could be arrogant enough to believe there aren't things in this universe that we don't understand or have any knowledge of.

~~someonecompletelyrandom~~ · 03-06-2012, 06:51 PM

I don't think anybody claimed that. In fact, science is a way to look for such answers, it doesn't claim to have them all.

I am religious, by the way.

blastingas10 · 03-06-2012, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conan

I don't think anybody claimed that. In fact, science is a way to look for such answers, it doesn't claim to have them all.

I am religious, by the way.

I'm not saying that anyone claimed it, just asking. It can seem that people have that mentality sometimes.

Paedantic Basterd · 03-06-2012, 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blastingas10

I wish there was a intelligent religious person here to balance this argument, 'cause it's completely one-sided. I haven't really been following the argument, but all you know-it-all's, you can't honestly believe that we (humans) have an understanding for everything. I don't see how anyone could be arrogant enough to believe there aren't things in this universe that we don't understand or have any knowledge of.

I don't think that you'd find that mentality in a discussion between two reasonable and intelligent individuals, but it's hard to remain open minded and curious when your opponent is spouting nonsensical self-righteous drivel. I think you'd find all of us more reasonable in discussion when speaking to a more reasonable individual.

blastingas10 · 03-06-2012, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedestrian

I don't think that you'd find that mentality in a discussion between two reasonable and intelligent individuals, but it's hard to remain open minded and curious when your opponent is spouting nonsensical self-righteous drivel. I think you'd find all of us more reasonable in discussion when speaking to a more reasonable individual.

I understand what you're saying. I'm not saying anyone is unreasonable.

MoonlitSunshine · 03-06-2012, 07:36 PM

You opened your post with a line about "you know-it-alls". it's hardly surprising that there was a reaction. :P

03-06-2012, 05:08 PM	#311 (permalink)
MoonlitSunshine Dat's Der Bunny! Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Ireland Posts: 1,088	You're confusing possible implication and necessary implication. The flu virus causes the flu. it is the only thing that causes the flu and it if called the flu virus because it causes the flu. That said, you can carry the flu virus in your body, and not have the flu. In the case, Carcinogens cause cancer. They are called carcinogens because they cause cancer, but you can have carcinogens in your body and not get cancer. Does that make sense? __________________ "I found it eventually, at the bottom of a locker in a disused laboratory, with a sign on the door saying "Beware of the Leopard". Ever thought of going into Advertising?" - Arthur Dent

03-06-2012, 05:31 PM	#314 (permalink)
Guybrush Juicious Maximus III Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Scabb Island Posts: 6,525	For the record, I know about double slit experiments and waveform collapse. What I disagree with is the idea that quarks are not subject to gravity and that this can somehow be utilized by humans in such a way that it allows us to walk on water. If anyone can find some evidence to the opposite, I am all ears. __________________ Something Completely Different

03-06-2012, 06:38 PM	#315 (permalink)
blastingas10 Music Addict Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 2,126	I wish there was a intelligent religious person here to balance this argument, 'cause it's completely one-sided. I haven't really been following the argument, but all you know-it-all's, you can't honestly believe that we (humans) have an understanding for everything. I don't see how anyone could be arrogant enough to believe there aren't things in this universe that we don't understand or have any knowledge of. Last edited by blastingas10; 03-06-2012 at 06:47 PM.

03-06-2012, 07:36 PM	#320 (permalink)
MoonlitSunshine Dat's Der Bunny! Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Ireland Posts: 1,088	You opened your post with a line about "you know-it-alls". it's hardly surprising that there was a reaction. :P __________________ "I found it eventually, at the bottom of a locker in a disused laboratory, with a sign on the door saying "Beware of the Leopard". Ever thought of going into Advertising?" - Arthur Dent

03-06-2012, 06:51 PM	#316 (permalink)
~~someonecompletelyrandom~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 4,538	I don't think anybody claimed that. In fact, science is a way to look for such answers, it doesn't claim to have them all. I am religious, by the way.