The Philosophical Debate Thread - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-08-2011, 10:33 PM   #1 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Thom Yorke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,848
Default The Philosophical Debate Thread

I was surprised to see that there was no thread for this in the philosophy section. Anything philosophy can go here.
Thom Yorke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2011, 10:34 PM   #2 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Thom Yorke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,848
Default

"Hume's argument is that we cannot rationally justify the claim that nature will continue to be uniform, as justification comes in only two varieties, and both of these are inadequate. The two sorts are demonstrative reasoning, and probable reasoning. With regards to demonstrative reasoning, Hume argues that the uniformity principle cannot be demonstrated, as it is "consistent and conceivable" that nature might stop being regular. Turning to probable reasoning, Hume argues that we cannot hold that nature will continue to be uniform because it has been in the past, as this is using the very sort of reasoning (induction) that is under question: it would be circular reasoning. Thus no form of justification will rationally warrant our inductive inferences."

I love this. Probably my favourite philosophical theory. It is illogical to assume that history will repeat itself based on history repeating itself before. If I say that the earth will suddenly fall out of orbit tomorrow, is it any less logical than saying it will stay in orbit?
Thom Yorke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 01:35 AM   #3 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thom Yorke View Post
"Hume's argument is that we cannot rationally justify the claim that nature will continue to be uniform, as justification comes in only two varieties, and both of these are inadequate. The two sorts are demonstrative reasoning, and probable reasoning. With regards to demonstrative reasoning, Hume argues that the uniformity principle cannot be demonstrated, as it is "consistent and conceivable" that nature might stop being regular. Turning to probable reasoning, Hume argues that we cannot hold that nature will continue to be uniform because it has been in the past, as this is using the very sort of reasoning (induction) that is under question: it would be circular reasoning. Thus no form of justification will rationally warrant our inductive inferences."

I love this. Probably my favourite philosophical theory. It is illogical to assume that history will repeat itself based on history repeating itself before. If I say that the earth will suddenly fall out of orbit tomorrow, is it any less logical than saying it will stay in orbit?
i think Chaos Theory has more or less proved that point
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 11:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
Passerby
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Void
Posts: 310
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Il Duce View Post
i think Chaos Theory has more or less proved that point
Chaos is no theory. No. It's not theory. Research the Word Chaos, and then tell me this "World" is not Chaos. And, if you use the suffix "logy", you can prove anything you think.

Quote:
I love this. Probably my favourite
Quote:
philosophical
theory. It is illogical to assume that history will repeat itself based on history repeating itself before. If I say that the earth will suddenly fall out of orbit tomorrow, is it any less logical than saying it will stay in orbit?
Philo - soph -y has to be proven with Theo -soph - y

Here's your clues.

phil(o) + Soph + ia So, A loving, dear fried Phil(o), can lead to Wisdom, through 'the study of anything "Phil"

a combining form appearing in loanwords from Greek, where it meant “loving” (philology); on this model, used in the formation of compound words (philoprogenitive).

The(o) + Soph + ia - No need to use any being named god. In the context of definition, use "mind, or principle invoked through the voice of the minds of man"

Theosophy is only a theory, because, of the meaning of ology.

We can prove and reason our time, if we choose to reason and rhyme.

It cannot prove through rhyme and reason, but, through rhyme we can reason our season.

We can only reason our destiny, because future is ancient history.
And love sent up the osophy, because, of the Word called prophecy.

We can prove the evidence and Truth, because 'wormwood' lies in the 'vermouth'.

So, is that 'philosophy'? Is it 'theosophy'.

The bottom line.

Love sent us the number 'six', to prove man is a dick in Styx.

"and the whole earth wondered after wisdom that came too late"

"Prophecy caused all the wonder, because 666 is its number"

And we do it through music and lyrics, and, weed out all the True heretics"

And, the rhymes that exist in the Word World? Hurled, twirled, swirled, whirled.

And, furled, and curled.

And the Name Jesus was sent in disgust, because religion must Truly be 'discussed'.

Now, research the 'root' meaning of discuss, because we are not a we, we are us.

So, there is no reason and rhyme, because, we don't see the reason in rhyme.

And, future is indeed ancient history, if you'd open you eyes to see mystery.

For, you cannot see Truth in the logical, until you find it and see as the mystical

And those who see in rhyme, can rhyme anywhere, anytime.

And finally,

Man sees forward as back, the only discuss is attack.

And you'll see this Truth as a lie, so, I'm certain to get no reply.

People who see the most, would never once pray to a ghost.

And, I don't believe in ghosts. Never have. But, I worked my a*s off for one.

You.

If you don't want to reply. Just throw out your favorite song. I'll show you how it can run you to everything you want to learn. And, it has nothing to do with religion. The scriptures only provide the evidence of what we must learn, through what we think we see.

Which is why I chose a music site. Not a religious forum. WWW? It can run in circles with one Word, or, one simple website can merge, delete, destroy, and create one thread, in one song, a whole New Order for as long as we are stuck here motionless. Stuck in a time warp.

Now, tell how Chaos is a theory? We cannot change history, or reality. Is does exist. We cannot predict any future, we are the future. We can recreate our own new destiny. We will never cease to exist, until we choose to cease to exist.

And, this a music and prose, site, so any replies, please present it in rhythmic structure. Then, we can 'discuss' logic and philosophy. And, I am not all that intelligent. I believe I am basically retarded. And, that is not 'politically incorrect'. Politics is politically incorrect. And, it must be 'discussed' as well.

So, why does discussed rhyme with disgust?

There is the question we can converse.

peace
blankety blank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 12:27 AM   #5 (permalink)
( ̄ー ̄)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,270
Default

Categorical Imperative all up in this biznatch
RVCA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 01:41 AM   #6 (permalink)
Killed Laura Palmer
 
ThePhanastasio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ashland, KY
Posts: 1,679
Default

Chaos Theory has proved?

Kind of an oxymoron, dontcha think?
__________________

It's a hand-me-down, the thoughts are broken
Perhaps they're better left unsung
ThePhanastasio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 02:18 AM   #7 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

ah i dunno

i suck at this
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 02:55 AM   #8 (permalink)
Killed Laura Palmer
 
ThePhanastasio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ashland, KY
Posts: 1,679
Default

I'm just messing with ya, mang. Chaos theory actually does make a lot more sense than a lot of theories people have slung about frequently.
__________________

It's a hand-me-down, the thoughts are broken
Perhaps they're better left unsung
ThePhanastasio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 11:14 AM   #9 (permalink)
AWhatup Ganache?
 
Mykonos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 381
Default

I'm a very philosophically confused person, and I doubt that will change any time soon, so I won't have much to say here. That said, I tend to mix a very literal worldview (dialectics being my main thing) with a spiritual side (I am in possession of a soul despite not being in the current employ of the armed services etc.).
__________________
'Not that Becktionary, the Rhyming Becktionary!'- Bender Bending Rodriguez
Mykonos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2011, 06:55 PM   #10 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

my philosophical state of mind is that I'm always questioning reality
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.