Would you live in a communist state? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-18-2011, 01:49 PM   #11 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unknown Soldier View Post
Do you live in a rural location?
Nope. I'm just as in thrall to the evils of Farmfresh as anyone else. I'm too lazy to be a survivalist unfortunately.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2011, 02:24 PM   #12 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phantom Limb View Post
I would be willing to be part of a communist system only if we did it right and it could be guaranteed that it wouldn't get super corrupt and ****ed up down the road. I've always liked the idea of communism, but the problem is true communism has never been more than an idea. Who's to say that we won't twist communism into some sort of dictatorship as well?

You could be right though. As far as I know communism has never been adopted by a nation as educated or as wealthy as the US. I'm willing to give it a try (though the entire right will undoubtedly close their ears as soon as they hear the dirty word).
Ah. See, this is a grave misconception. I might have erred in using the word "state" to describe it, because a truly Marxist community would have no centralized government, and absolutely no authoritarian control. Communism has been unfortunately tied inexorably to authoritarianism because revolutionary communism establishes a new sociopolitical hierarchy; communism in the purest sense is a teleological conclusion to the development of wealth (viz. freedom in Hegelian terms).

Feudalism -> Industrialism/Capitalism -> [Socialism] -> Communism
__________________
first.am
lucifer_sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2011, 02:14 PM   #13 (permalink)
\/ GOD
 
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
Default

I am very left wing, and for elements of socialism/communism. But, I feel pure communism is naive. It entrusts a communal rule, which entrusts people to get along selfishly for their own betterment.

Which, frankly, doesn't work. What happens then is for the four out of five guys/gals who might be getting along swell(and that's an optimistic sample itself), there's one who will break the rules, and takes over...

Then again the Republic has the EXACT same problem, it's just more gradual. If you don't believe me check into the name: Hitler, Adolph, or further into the concept of a 30 day marshal law.

I however would love to live in a state that has:

A) Free education(no financial aid as it's just a way for bankers to siphon money from the government to person to bank to government.)

B) Free transportation.

C) Free standardized housing.

D) An organized, and systematic employment system(I volley for forcing all jobs under 12$ to forfeit their application system to the government.). one of which would guarantee employment to people applying rather than weak substitutes like unemployment insurance.

E) Cheap healthcare/insurance. (Plus, the illegalization of Religious, and private hospitals).

F) An active non-apathetic government that utilizes common tasks of improving cities, transportation, etc. Filling in the job gaps with productive mutually life increasing means.

G) A gap on the military as it's being misused(as in, limited membership), is underfunded. There are too many soldiers, and too many people signing up for the economic benefits. Perhaps if the actual internal employment system was as open, focused, and productive we may have a very stable, productive economy.

Some of these values may be construed as very left-wing, or communist, so I suppose I'd like a variation, but feel the full elimination of property ownership is extreme, and unrealistic.

P.S. Occupy is a ****ing joke, and has accomplished nothing. It's nothing more than a ton of upper middle class university students(future business class) indulging in vanity protest hipster retroism.
__________________
Quote:
Terence Hill, as recently confirmed during an interview to an Italian TV talk-show, was offered the role but rejected it because he considered it "too violent". Dustin Hoffman and John Travolta declined the role for the same reason. When Al Pacino was considered for the role of John Rambo, he turned it down when his request that Rambo be more of a madman was rejected.
Al Pacino = God
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2011, 04:13 PM   #14 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Zaqarbal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 824
Default

Marx was dialectically sodomized by marginalism. The most intelligent left-wingers (the real leftists, from my personal point of view) of the time, like Eduard Bernstein, realized the truth and they looked for better ways of political action.

Marx, as an economist, is nothing. Forget him. The real reference is John Maynard Keynes, and, in certain aspects, John Stuart Mill.
__________________
"Lullabies for adults / crossed by the years / carry the flower of disappointment / tattooed in their gloomy melodies."
Zaqarbal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2011, 07:30 PM   #15 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
The Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 803
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unknown Soldier View Post
Karl Marx originally envisaged a rich industrialized country for his doctrine and not a peasant based society like imperialist Russia. He probably had Great Britain or Germany in mind when he wrote his Communist Manifesto in the 19th century. If he were around today he`d probably be looking at the USA as the perfect model for a communist society.....its an interesting concept.
When East Germany was turned communist in the 1940s it was far more industrialized than the UK or Germany was in the 1840s. I guess though you could argue that in the East German case the communism was forced upon the country by an external power rather than rising up within itself.

Anyway, my feelings towards communism is that any single concentration of power, such as that of the communist parties in all communist revolutions to date, will almost inevitably lead to corruption. The only exception to this rule is probably the Paris Commune of 1871, but since it lasted for just a short time, it's hard to analyse its potential for success. But that specific case was closer to the anarchism of Mikhail Bakunin than the communism of Karl Marx, so maybe it's not relevant to compare to the other revolutions.
__________________
Now another stranger seems to want you to ignore his dreams as though they were the burden of some other

The Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2011, 10:28 PM   #16 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
hip hop bunny hop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
Default

Guh. This is a prime example of why Communism disgusts me so thoroughly.

Whether you're talking Leninists or Anarchists - they are all obsessed with ideological purity. The level of dogma present is just jaw dropping....



Even if we ignore this tendency on the micro-level, it's frequency on the national level is jaw dropping - trotsky & stalin, tito & stalin, sino-soviet split, sino-albanian split, the gang of four, etc....
__________________
Have mercy on the poor.
hip hop bunny hop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2011, 11:31 PM   #17 (permalink)
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zaqarbal View Post
Marx was dialectically sodomized by marginalism. The most intelligent left-wingers (the real leftists, from my personal point of view) of the time, like Eduard Bernstein, realized the truth and they looked for better ways of political action.

Marx, as an economist, is nothing. Forget him. The real reference is John Maynard Keynes, and, in certain aspects, John Stuart Mill.
Could you expound upon this a little more? I'm fairly competent with Marx's dialectic progression but a little shaky on the economic precepts behind it. The 1844 Manuscripts show Marx's dialectic but not much beyond that.

Which is probably why communism hasn't worked that well in the past...ideologues and philosophers writing economic law sounds absolutely terrifying to me.
__________________
first.am
lucifer_sam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2011, 03:04 PM   #18 (permalink)
\/ GOD
 
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop View Post
Guh. This is a prime example of why Communism disgusts me so thoroughly.

Whether you're talking Leninists or Anarchists - they are all obsessed with ideological purity. The level of dogma present is just jaw dropping....



Even if we ignore this tendency on the micro-level, it's frequency on the national level is jaw dropping - trotsky & stalin, tito & stalin, sino-soviet split, sino-albanian split, the gang of four, etc....
...That's one of the most completely random out of context youtube clips I've ever seen in my life.
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2011, 09:53 AM   #19 (permalink)
Zum Henker Defätist!!
 
The Batlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
Default

Especially when you consider the split the Republican party he seems to love so much is undergoing it's own split as we speak.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien
There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.
The Batlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2011, 05:18 PM   #20 (permalink)
\/ GOD
 
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
Especially when you consider the split the Republican party he seems to love so much is undergoing it's own split as we speak.
Yes, but the Christian Identity League might just mend ways with the KKK!
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.