|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-18-2011, 01:49 PM | #11 (permalink) | |
Zum Henker Defätist!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
|
Nope. I'm just as in thrall to the evils of Farmfresh as anyone else. I'm too lazy to be a survivalist unfortunately.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
10-18-2011, 02:24 PM | #12 (permalink) | |
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
|
Quote:
Feudalism -> Industrialism/Capitalism -> [Socialism] -> Communism
__________________
first.am |
|
10-21-2011, 02:14 PM | #13 (permalink) | |
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
I am very left wing, and for elements of socialism/communism. But, I feel pure communism is naive. It entrusts a communal rule, which entrusts people to get along selfishly for their own betterment.
Which, frankly, doesn't work. What happens then is for the four out of five guys/gals who might be getting along swell(and that's an optimistic sample itself), there's one who will break the rules, and takes over... Then again the Republic has the EXACT same problem, it's just more gradual. If you don't believe me check into the name: Hitler, Adolph, or further into the concept of a 30 day marshal law. I however would love to live in a state that has: A) Free education(no financial aid as it's just a way for bankers to siphon money from the government to person to bank to government.) B) Free transportation. C) Free standardized housing. D) An organized, and systematic employment system(I volley for forcing all jobs under 12$ to forfeit their application system to the government.). one of which would guarantee employment to people applying rather than weak substitutes like unemployment insurance. E) Cheap healthcare/insurance. (Plus, the illegalization of Religious, and private hospitals). F) An active non-apathetic government that utilizes common tasks of improving cities, transportation, etc. Filling in the job gaps with productive mutually life increasing means. G) A gap on the military as it's being misused(as in, limited membership), is underfunded. There are too many soldiers, and too many people signing up for the economic benefits. Perhaps if the actual internal employment system was as open, focused, and productive we may have a very stable, productive economy. Some of these values may be construed as very left-wing, or communist, so I suppose I'd like a variation, but feel the full elimination of property ownership is extreme, and unrealistic. P.S. Occupy is a ****ing joke, and has accomplished nothing. It's nothing more than a ton of upper middle class university students(future business class) indulging in vanity protest hipster retroism.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
10-21-2011, 04:13 PM | #14 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 824
|
Marx was dialectically sodomized by marginalism. The most intelligent left-wingers (the real leftists, from my personal point of view) of the time, like Eduard Bernstein, realized the truth and they looked for better ways of political action.
Marx, as an economist, is nothing. Forget him. The real reference is John Maynard Keynes, and, in certain aspects, John Stuart Mill.
__________________
"Lullabies for adults / crossed by the years / carry the flower of disappointment / tattooed in their gloomy melodies."
|
10-23-2011, 07:30 PM | #15 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 803
|
Quote:
Anyway, my feelings towards communism is that any single concentration of power, such as that of the communist parties in all communist revolutions to date, will almost inevitably lead to corruption. The only exception to this rule is probably the Paris Commune of 1871, but since it lasted for just a short time, it's hard to analyse its potential for success. But that specific case was closer to the anarchism of Mikhail Bakunin than the communism of Karl Marx, so maybe it's not relevant to compare to the other revolutions.
__________________
Now another stranger seems to want you to ignore his dreams as though they were the burden of some other |
|
10-23-2011, 10:28 PM | #16 (permalink) |
Music Addict
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
|
Guh. This is a prime example of why Communism disgusts me so thoroughly.
Whether you're talking Leninists or Anarchists - they are all obsessed with ideological purity. The level of dogma present is just jaw dropping.... Even if we ignore this tendency on the micro-level, it's frequency on the national level is jaw dropping - trotsky & stalin, tito & stalin, sino-soviet split, sino-albanian split, the gang of four, etc....
__________________
Have mercy on the poor. |
10-23-2011, 11:31 PM | #17 (permalink) | |
Unrepentant Ass-Mod
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,921
|
Quote:
Which is probably why communism hasn't worked that well in the past...ideologues and philosophers writing economic law sounds absolutely terrifying to me.
__________________
first.am |
|
10-24-2011, 03:04 PM | #18 (permalink) | |
\/ GOD
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
|
Quote:
|
|
10-25-2011, 09:53 AM | #19 (permalink) | |
Zum Henker Defätist!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beating GNR at DDR and keying Axl's new car
Posts: 48,199
|
Especially when you consider the split the Republican party he seems to love so much is undergoing it's own split as we speak.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|